Nonfinancial barriers and access to care for U.S. adults.

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars, Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Health Services Research (Impact Factor: 2.49). 08/2011; 47(1 Pt 2):462-85. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01308.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To identify prevalences and predictors of nonfinancial barriers that lead to unmet need or delayed care among U.S. adults.
2007 Health Tracking Household Survey.
Reasons for unmet need or delayed care in the previous 12 months were assigned to one of five dimensions in the Penchansky and Thomas model of access to care. Prevalences of barriers in each nonfinancial dimension were estimated for all adults and for adults with affordability barriers. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate associations between individual, household, and insurance characteristics and barriers in each access dimension.
Eighteen percent of U.S. adults experienced affordability barriers and 21 percent experienced nonfinancial barriers that led to unmet need or delayed care. Two-thirds of adults with affordability barriers also reported nonfinancial barriers. Young adults, women, individuals with lower incomes, parents, and persons with at least one chronic illness had higher adjusted prevalences of nonfinancial barriers.
Nonfinancial barriers are common reasons for unmet need or delayed care among U.S. adults and frequently coincide with affordability barriers. Failure to address nonfinancial barriers may limit the impact of policies that seek to expand access by improving the affordability of health care.

  • Health Services Research 02/2012; 47(1 Pt 2):329-36. DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01373.x · 2.49 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Gender inequity in access to renal transplantation waiting lists, in favor of men, has long since been demonstrated in a number of studies. Discrepancies between the results of the available studies might be explained by different analytical approaches or different national contexts. In this study we analyzed French end-stage renal disease registry data using a novel model to determine whether the female gender is associated with a lower probability of being listed on the transplant waiting list or with a longer time from dialysis start until registration, or both. METHODS: The effect of gender on access to the national renal transplantation waiting list was assessed in 9497 men and 5386 women aged 18 to 74 years who started dialysis between 2002 and 2009. We used a semiparametric regression cure model adjusted for age, work status, and 11 comorbidities or disabilities. RESULTS: Women were younger and less likely to work or have associated comorbidities. At the study endpoint, 33.8% of the men and 34.1% of the women were placed on the renal transplantation waiting list. After taking potential confounders into account, our model shows that women demonstrated a lower probability of being registered on the national transplant waiting list (odds ratio=0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.78) and a longer time from dialysis start to registration (hazard ratio=0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-0.95) than men. This disparity affects predominantly older women who do not work or have diabetes and is more pronounced in some geographic areas. CONCLUSIONS: These poorly understood gender-based inequities require further consideration.
    Transplantation 08/2012; 94(5):513-519. DOI:10.1097/TP.0b013e31825d156a · 3.78 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Little is known about the impact of the recent US economic downturn and health care reform on patient, caregiver and health care provider (HCP) decision-making for haemophilia A. To explore the impact of the recent economic downturn and perceived impact of health care reform on haemophilia A treatment decisions from patient, caregiver and HCP perspectives. Patients/caregivers and HCPs completed a self-administered survey in 2011. Survey participants were asked about demographics, the impact of the recent economic downturn and health care reform provisions on their treatment decisions. Seventy three of the 134 (54%) patients/caregivers and 39 of 48 (81%) HCPs indicated that the economic downturn negatively impacted haemophilia care. Seventy of the 73 negatively impacted patients made financially related treatment modifications, including delaying/cancelling routine health care visit, skipping doses and/or skipping filling prescription. Treatment modifications made by HCPs included delaying elective surgery, switching from higher to lower priced product, switching from recombinant to plasma-derived products and delaying prophylaxis. Health care reform was generally perceived as positive. Due to the elimination of lifetime caps, 30 of 134 patients (22%) and 28 of 48 HCPs (58%) indicated that they will make treatment modifications by initiating prophylaxis or scheduling routine appointment/surgery sooner. Both patients/caregivers and HCPs reported that the economic downturn had a negative impact on haemophilia A treatment. Suboptimal treatment modifications were made due to the economic downturn. Health care reform, especially the elimination of lifetime caps, was perceived as positive for haemophilia A treatment and as a potential avenue for contributing to more optimal treatment behaviours.
    Haemophilia 01/2013; 19(1). DOI:10.1111/hae.12008 · 2.47 Impact Factor

Similar Publications