Developmental control of gene copy number by repression of replication initiation and fork progression

Whitehead Institute and Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.
Genome Research (Impact Factor: 14.63). 11/2011; 22(1):64-75. DOI: 10.1101/gr.126003.111
Source: PubMed


Precise DNA replication is crucial for genome maintenance, yet this process has been inherently difficult to study on a genome-wide level in untransformed differentiated metazoan cells. To determine how metazoan DNA replication can be repressed, we examined regions selectively under-replicated in Drosophila polytene salivary glands, and found they are transcriptionally silent and enriched for the repressive H3K27me3 mark. In the first genome-wide analysis of binding of the origin recognition complex (ORC) in a differentiated metazoan tissue, we find that ORC binding is dramatically reduced within these large domains, suggesting reduced initiation as one mechanism leading to under-replication. Inhibition of replication fork progression by the chromatin protein SUUR is an additional repression mechanism to reduce copy number. Although repressive histone marks are removed when SUUR is mutated and copy number restored, neither transcription nor ORC binding is reinstated. Tethering of the SUUR protein to a specific site is insufficient to block replication, however. These results establish that developmental control of DNA replication, at both the initiation and elongation stages, is a mechanism to change gene copy number during differentiation.

Download full-text


Available from: Matthew Eaton, Sep 23, 2014
18 Reads
  • Source
    • "I - DNAse I hypersensitivity sites (high magnitude DHS - vertical lines) in S2, BG3, and Kc cells by Kharchenko et al. [22]. J - ORC2-binding sites in S2, BG3, Kc cells and salivary glands by Eaton et al. [45], Sher et al. [46]. K – Enrichment profiles of NSL complex components: NSL1 binding profile from salivary glands by Raja et al. [47], NSL3 in S2 cells by Lam et al. [48], NSL1 in S2 cells by Feller et al. [49]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Drosophila melanogaster polytene chromosomes display specific banding pattern; the underlying genetic organization of this pattern has remained elusive for many years. In the present paper, we analyze 32 cytology-mapped polytene chromosome interbands. We estimated molecular locations of these interbands, described their molecular and genetic organization and demonstrate that polytene chromosome interbands contain the 5' ends of housekeeping genes. As a rule, interbands display preferential "head-to-head" orientation of genes. They are enriched for "broad" class promoters characteristic of housekeeping genes and associate with open chromatin proteins and Origin Recognition Complex (ORC) components. In two regions, 10A and 100B, coding sequences of genes whose 5'-ends reside in interbands map to constantly loosely compacted, early-replicating, so-called "grey" bands. Comparison of expression patterns of genes mapping to late-replicating dense bands vs genes whose promoter regions map to interbands shows that the former are generally tissue-specific, whereas the latter are represented by ubiquitously active genes. Analysis of RNA-seq data (modENCODE-FlyBase) indicates that transcripts from interband-mapping genes are present in most tissues and cell lines studied, across most developmental stages and upon various treatment conditions. We developed a special algorithm to computationally process protein localization data generated by the modENCODE project and show that Drosophila genome has about 5700 sites that demonstrate all the features shared by the interbands cytologically mapped to date.
    PLoS ONE 07/2014; 9(7):e101631. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0101631 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "This might seem unlikely, since partially rereplicated DNA can lead to gene amplification (Green et al., 2010), but it would be preferable to having unrestrained forks, and rereplicated DNA could be subjected to subsequent repair by nascent strand displacement or exonuclease activity . A precedent for this kind of mechanism exists in Drosophila polytene chromosomes, in which the SUUR protein represses fork movement, possibly via an effect on chromatin structure involving the repressive H3K27me3 modification (Sher et al., 2012). Maintaining genome stability in gamete formation is important, particularly in multicellular organisms, which may have hundreds of thousands of replication origins, and high-fidelity licensing control may fail to block completely illegal initiation events. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Meiosis involves two successive rounds of chromosome segregation without an intervening S phase. Exit from meiosis I is distinct from mitotic exit in that replication origins are not licensed by Mcm2-7 chromatin binding, but spindle disassembly occurs during a transient interphase-like state before meiosis II. The absence of licensing is assumed to explain the block to DNA replication but this has not been formally tested. Here we attempt to subvert this block by expressing the licensing control factors Cdc18 and Cdt1 during the interval between meiotic nuclear divisions. Surprisingly, this leads only to a partial round of DNA replication, even when these factors are overexpressed and effect clear Mcm2-7 chromatin binding. Combining Cdc18 and Cdt1 expression with modulation of cyclin dependent kinase activity, activation of Dbf4-dependent kinase or deletion of the Spd1-inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase has little additional effect on the extent of DNA replication. Single-molecule analysis indicates this partial round of replication results from inefficient progression of replication forks, thus both initiation and elongation replication steps may be inhibited in late meiosis. In addition, DNA replication or damage during the meiosis I-II interval fails to arrest meiotic progress, suggesting absence of checkpoint regulation of meiosis II entry.
    Molecular biology of the cell 01/2013; 24(5). DOI:10.1091/mbc.E12-11-0825 · 4.47 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "It was also shown that SUUR tethering to a novel chromosomal target does not cause under-replication (Sher et al. 2012). Furthermore, in SuUR mutants, when under-replication disappears , ORC binding is not altered (Sher et al. 2012). Thus, it seems that SUUR might repress DNA replication in latereplicating chromosomal regions by impeding replication fork progression. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Drosophila SUUR (Suppressor of UnderReplication) protein was shown to regulate the DNA replication elongation process in endocycling cells. This protein is also known to be the component of silent chromatin in polyploid and diploid cells. To mark the different cell cycle stages, we used immunostaining patterns of PCNA, the main structural component of replication fork. We demonstrate that SUUR chromatin binding is dynamic throughout the endocyle in Drosophila salivary glands. We observed that SUUR chromosomal localization changed along with PCNA pattern and these proteins largely co-localized during the late S-phase in salivary glands. The hypothesized interaction between SUUR and PCNA was confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation from embryonic nuclear extracts. Our findings support the idea that the effect of SUUR on replication elongation depends on the cell cycle stage and can be mediated through its physical interaction with replication fork.
    Chromosoma 11/2012; 122(1). DOI:10.1007/s00412-012-0390-9 · 4.60 Impact Factor
Show more