Evidence-based medicine underpins modern practice of medicine. This paper describes a fictional consultation between Santa Claus and a doctor regarding deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis, giving a review of the evidence for DVT prophylaxis in travellers while exposing the difficulty in applying evidence to atypical clinical encounters. Medline and the Cochrane Library were searched, and guidelines reviewed. Keywords used were DVT, thromboembolism, deep vein thrombosis and air travel-related venous thromboembolism. All relevant studies found, have been included in this review, with additional studies identified from the references in these articles. In conclusion, compression stockings, with or without a one-off dose of either aspirin or heparin, are the most evidence-based approaches for prophylaxis in someone with established risk factors for DVT prior to a long-haul flight. Simple exercises should also be encouraged.
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Deep vein thrombosisA deep vein thrombosis commonly presents with pain, erythema, tenderness, and swelling of the affected limb. Findings on examination include a palpable cord (reflecting a thrombosed vein), warmth, ipsilateral oedema, or superficial venous dilation. Differential diagnoses include a ruptured Baker's cyst, muscle tears or pulls, and infective cellulitis. Objective diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (as with pulmonary embolism) is important for optimal management, and although the clinical diagnosis is imprecise, models based on clinical features are fairly practical and reliable in predicting the likelihood of an event. Only a minority of patients (less than a third) with suspected deep vein thrombosis of a lower limb actually have the disease.Compression ultrasonography remains the non-invasive tool of choice for the investigation and diagnosis of clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis. Although such imaging is highly sensitive for detecting proximal deep vein thrombosis, it is less accurate for isolated deep vein thrombosis of the calf. The ideal method, invasive contrast venography, is used when a definitive answer is required.Newer imaging techniques being developed (for example, magnetic resonance venography, computed tomography) could detect pelvic vein thromboses, although further testing is necessary to establish their role in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. Blood tests such as for fibrin d-dimer, a fibrin degradation product, add to the diagnostic accuracy of the non-invasive tests. d-dimer levels are > 500 ng/ml in nearly all patients with venous thromboembolism. Alone, they are insufficient to establish the diagnosis as such levels are non-specific and often can be found in patients admitted to hospital and in those with malignancy or after recent surgery. Thus, a low or normal d-dimer level with a low pretest probability makes a diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (or pulmonary embolism) unlikely. Figure 1 shows a practical approach to the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis using the pretest probability model and a clinical approach to diagnosis.Fig 1Clinical approach to the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. Adapted from Ho et al1Summary pointsVenous thromboembolism, comprising deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, are common and treatable in hospital and the communityMajor risk factors include age, recent surgery (especially orthopaedic), cancer, and thrombophiliaEstablished treatments are unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin, fondaparinux, and warfarinTreatment agents and duration depend on the cause
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: The risk of venous thrombosis is thought to be increased by flying. In a study of 20 healthy male volunteers who were suddenly exposed to a hypobaric environment similar to that encountered within aeroplane cabins, markers of activated coagulation transiently Increased by two-fold to eight-fold. We suggest that hypobaric hypoxia, with sedentariness and dehydration, may cause this increased risk of venous thrombosis.
The Lancet 12/2000; 356(9242):1657-8. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03165-2 · 45.22 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.