Quantifying seismic survey reverberation off the Alaskan North Slope

Marine Physical Laboratory, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0238, USA.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (Impact Factor: 1.5). 11/2011; 130(5):3046-58. DOI: 10.1121/1.3628326
Source: PubMed


Shallow-water airgun survey activities off the North Slope of Alaska generate impulsive sounds that are the focus of much regulatory attention. Reverberation from repetitive airgun shots, however, can also increase background noise levels, which can decrease the detection range of nearby passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) systems. Typical acoustic metrics for impulsive signals provide no quantitative information about reverberation or its relative effect on the ambient acoustic environment. Here, two conservative metrics are defined for quantifying reverberation: a minimum level metric measures reverberation levels that exist between airgun pulse arrivals, while a reverberation metric estimates the relative magnitude of reverberation vs expected ambient levels in the hypothetical absence of airgun activity, using satellite-measured wind data. The metrics are applied to acoustic data measured by autonomous recorders in the Alaskan Beaufort Sea in 2008 and demonstrate how seismic surveys can increase the background noise over natural ambient levels by 30-45 dB within 1 km of the activity, by 10-25 dB within 15 km of the activity, and by a few dB at 128 km range. These results suggest that shallow-water reverberation would reduce the performance of nearby PAM systems when monitoring for marine mammals within a few kilometers of shallow-water seismic surveys.

1 Follower
72 Reads
  • Source
    • "Concern over short-and long-term impacts of ocean noise on marine mammals has increased substantially over the past decade (National Research Council, 2000, 2003, 2005). Air guns for oil and gas exploration and the propulsion systems of large ships can make substantial contributions to the ocean noise budget over short and long time scales, respectively (Andrew et al., 2011; Guerra et al., 2011; Klinck et al., 2012b; McKenna et al., 2012). The first step in managing this noise is characterizing it, but few contemporary studies of open water Arctic background noise exist (Roth et al., 2012, 2013). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Persistently poor weather in the Arctic makes traditional marine mammal research from aircraft and ships difficult, yet collecting information on marine mammal distribution and habitat utilization is vital for understanding the impact of climate change on Arctic ecosystems. Moreover, as industrial use of the Arctic increases with the expansion of the open-water summer season, there is an urgent need to monitor the effects of noise from oil and gas exploration and commercial shipping on marine mammals. During September 2013, we deployed a single Slocum glider equipped with a digital acoustic monitoring (DMON) instrument to record and process in situ low-frequency (
    Marine Technology Society Journal 10/2014; 48(5):40-51. DOI:10.4031/MTSJ.48.5.2 · 0.43 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Using month-long readings of wind speed, as collected every 10 min by selected offshore buoys (operated by the National Data Buoy Center in close proximity to each of the underwater MARUs, we examined the underwater signature of this abiotic source. Since quantification of the relative contributions from wind is still an ongoing area of research (e.g., Guerra et al., 2011), we use here an empirical approach to qualitatively inspect the temporal and spatial variation in wind and its impact on the spectral characteristics of noise, as displayed on the spectrograms. Table 1 MARU deployment information for the geographical locations used in this study. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Differing physical characteristics and levels of biological, environmental, and anthropogenic sounds contribute in varying levels of noise in different ocean environments. As a result, animals migrating over large ranges or widely distributed species are now exposed to a myriad of different acoustic environments, within which they must navigate, forage and reproduce. Given current increases in low-frequency (< 1000 Hz) anthropogenic noise, there is concern that resultant masking of communication and naturally occurring sounds may stress cetaceans already facing other forms of habitat degradation. As a critical first step to understanding the acoustic environments of coastal marine ecosystems, we examined month-long acoustic data from ten sites along the U.S. east coast that are either designated critical habitats or located along the migratory corridor of the North Atlantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis): Gulf of Maine, Jeffreys Ledge, Massachusetts Bay, Cape Cod Bay, New York, New Jersey, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia (North), and Georgia (South). Data were collected using hydrophones positioned at depth to evaluate differences in the acoustic environment at these sites. High noise levels were observed at both major (New York, Boston) and non-major (Georgia) shipping ports located in or near the areas of study. Of the ten study sites, New Jersey and New York experienced the highest equivalent sound levels, while South Carolina and the Gulf of Maine presented the lowest. The majority of noise variability was found in low-frequency bands below 500 Hz, including the 71–224 Hz communication range utilized by long distance, contact-calling right whales and many other whale and fish species. The spatio-temporal variability of anthropogenic noise can be viewed as a form of habitat fragmentation, where inundations of noise may mask key sounds, resulting in a loss of “acoustic space” (overlapping frequency band and time of a whale’s vocalization), which could otherwise be occupied by vocalizations and other acoustic cues utilized by cetaceans. This loss of acoustic space could potentially degrade habitat suitability by reducing the geographic distance across which individuals acoustically communicate, and ultimately, over long timescales, disrupt aspects related to their natural behavior and ecology. Because communication plays a vital role in the life history of cetacean species, understanding temporal and geographical differences in ambient noise as part of cetacean ecology and habitat may elucidate future conservation strategies related to the assessment of noise impacts.
    Ecological Informatics 05/2014; 21. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2014.01.005 · 1.73 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Most assessments of multiple, interacting, and/or repeated anthropogenic underwater sounds (sometimes considered to be an aspect of cumulative effects assessment) rely on narrative descriptions rather than systematic evaluations. In 2010, recognizing the need to better understand the potential effects of multiple sound sources (such as vessels, drilling rigs, pile drivers and seismic operations), British Petroleum (BP) sponsored the University of California to convene an expert committee tasked with advancing a method of systematic evaluation. The method developed by the committee (1) identifies the species, region, and period to be assessed, (2) compiles data on relevant sound sources for that region and period, (3) models the acoustic footprint of those sources, (4) models the movement of simulated marine mammals (animats) through the acoustic footprint, and (5) aggregates data on sound exposure and movements for each of the simulated animals. The method was applied to a test case or trial loosely based on data from the Alaskan Beaufort Sea during a period of seismic exploration and other activities. Substantial additional work is needed to better define output metrics related to degradation of acoustic habitat and to understand the potential effects of multiple sound sources on individuals and populations. Nevertheless, the method provides a starting point that will lead to improved understanding of the implications of multiple underwater sound sources associated with industrial activities. Introduction Regulators, researchers and industry recognize the need to assess the possible effects of multiple anthropogenic underwater sounds (such as sounds from vessels, drilling rigs, pile drivers and seismic operations) on marine mammals, including the effects of interacting and repeated sounds (Southall et al. 2007; Streever et al. 2011; Moore et al. 2012). However, most assessments of the potential effects of multiple sound sources on marine mammals rely on qualitative descriptions rather than systematic evaluations. Starting in 2010, BP sponsored the University of California to convene an expert committee tasked with advancing a method for systematic evaluation. Collectively, the multi-disciplinary committee has expertise in physical acoustics, marine and terrestrial mammalogy, statistics, risk assessment, hearing physiology and assessment of cumulative effects. Committee members are affiliated with universities, public agencies, nonprofit organizations and the private sector. The project offers reimbursement for travel expenses but does not provide salary or honoraria. The committee operates in the tradition of academic freedom and can publish group products such as reports and peer-reviewed journal articles without the approval of the University of California or BP. Since early 2010, the committee has met five times. At each meeting, the attending members have explicitly recognized and emphasized the goal of advancing the development of a method or methods, as opposed to completely defining a single approach or undertaking a detailed study of the effects of multiple sound sources in a real-life scenario. Between meetings, members of the committee have worked remotely to move specific components of the overall project forward.
Show more