Article

Population pharmacokinetics of liposomal amphotericin B and caspofungin in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell recipients.

Centre for Clinical Trials Muenster, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Federal Republic of Germany.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (impact factor: 4.84). 11/2011; 56(1):536-43. DOI:10.1128/AAC.00265-11 pp.536-43
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Liposomal amphotericin B (LAMB) and caspofungin (CAS) are important antifungal agents in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (aHSCT) recipients. Little is known, however, about the pharmacokinetics (PK) of both agents and their combination in this population. The PK of LAMB and CAS and the potential for PK interactions between both agents were investigated within a risk-stratified, randomized phase II clinical trial in 53 adult aHSCT recipients with granulocytopenia and refractory fever. Patients received either LAMB (n = 17; 3 mg/kg once a day [QD]), CAS (n = 19; 50 mg QD; day 1, 70 mg), or the combination of both (CAS-LAMB; n = 17) for a median duration of 10 to 13 days (range, 4 to 28 days) until defervescence and granulocyte recovery. PK sampling was performed on days 1 and 4. Drug concentrations in plasma (LAMB, 405 samples; CAS, 458 samples) were quantified by high-pressure liquid chromatography and were analyzed using population pharmacokinetic modeling. CAS concentration data best fitted a two-compartment model with a proportional error model and interindividual variability (IIV) for clearance (CL) and central volume of distribution (V(1)) (CL, 0.462 liter/h ± 25%; V(1), 8.33 liters ± 29%; intercompartmental clearance [Q], 1.25 liters/h; peripheral volume of distribution [V(2)], 3.59 liters). Concentration data for LAMB best fitted a two-compartment model with a proportional error model and IIV for all parameters (CL, 1.22 liters/h ± 64%; V(1), 19.2 liters ± 38%; Q, 2.18 liters/h ± 47%; V(2), 52.8 liters ± 84%). Internal model validation showed predictability and robustness of both models. None of the covariates tested (LAMB or CAS comedication, gender, body weight, age, body surface area, serum bilirubin, and creatinine clearance) further improved the models. In summary, the disposition of LAMB and CAS was best described by two-compartment models. Drug exposures in aHSCT patients were comparable to those in other populations, and no PK interactions were observed between the two compounds.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
48 Views
  • Article: Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A formula has been developed to predict creatinine clearance (Ccr) from serum creatinine (Scr) in adult males: (see article)(15% less in females). Derivation included the relationship found between age and 24-hour creatinine excretion/kg in 249 patients aged 18-92. Values for Ccr were predicted by this formula and four other methods and the results compared with the means of two 24-hour Ccr's measured in 236 patients. The above formula gave a correlation coefficient between predicted and mean measured Ccr's of 0.83; on average, the difference predicted and mean measured values was no greater than that between paired clearances. Factors for age and body weight must be included for reasonable prediction.
    Nephron 02/1976; 16(1):31-41. · 13.26 Impact Factor

Keywords

53 adult aHSCT recipients
 
antifungal agents
 
body surface area
 
central volume
 
creatinine clearance
 
day 1
 
days 1
 
high-pressure liquid chromatography
 
intercompartmental clearance [Q]
 
interindividual variability
 
Internal model validation
 
Liposomal amphotericin B
 
peripheral volume
 
PK interactions
 
PK sampling
 
population pharmacokinetic modeling
 
proportional error model
 
refractory fever
 
two compounds
 
two-compartment model