Article

The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of management strategies for sciatica: systematic review and economic model.

Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, School of Medicine, North Wales Clinical School, Wrexham, UK.
Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) 11/2011; 15(39):1-578. DOI: 10.3310/hta15390
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Sciatica is a symptom characterised by well-localised leg pain with a sharp, shooting or burning quality that radiates down the back of the leg and normally to the foot or ankle. It is often associated with numbness or altered sensation in the leg.
To determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different management strategies for sciatica.
Major electronic databases (e.g. MEDLINE, EMBASE and NHS Economic Evaluation Database) and several internet sites including trial registries were searched up to December 2009.
Systematic reviews were undertaken of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different treatment strategies for sciatica. Effectiveness data were synthesised using both conventional meta-analyses and mixed treatment comparison (MTC) methods. An economic model was then developed to estimate costs per quality-adjusted life-year gained for each treatment strategy.
The searches identified 33,590 references, of which 270 studies met the inclusion criteria and 12 included a full economic evaluation. A further 42 ongoing studies and 93 publications that could not be translated were identified. The interventions were grouped into 18 treatment categories. A larger number of studies evaluated invasive interventions and non-opioids than other non-invasive interventions. The proportion of good-quality studies for each treatment category ranged from 0% to 50%. Compared with studies of less invasive interventions, studies of invasive treatments were more likely to confirm disc herniation by imaging, to limit patients included to those with acute sciatica (< 3 months' duration) and to include patients who had received previous treatment. The MTC analyses gave an indication of relative therapeutic effect. The statistically significant odds ratios of global effect compared with inactive control were as follows: disc surgery 2.8, epidural injection 3.1, chemonucleolysis 2.0 and non-opioids 2.6. Disc surgery and epidural injections were associated with more adverse effects than the inactive control. There was some evidence for the effectiveness of biological agents and acupuncture. Opioid medication and activity restriction were found to be less effective than the comparator interventions and opioids were associated with more adverse effects than the inactive control. The full economic evaluations were of reasonable to good quality, but were not able to fully address our research question. Although individual studies raised a number of important issues, it was difficult to draw meaningful conclusions across studies because of their heterogeneity. The economic model demonstrated that stepped-care approaches to patient management were likely to be cost-effective, relative to strategies that involved direct referral to disc surgery.
The limited number of studies for some comparisons, the high level of heterogeneity (within treatment comparisons) and the potential inconsistency (between treatment comparisons) weaken the interpretation of the MTC analyses.
These findings provide support for the effectiveness of currently used therapies for sciatica such as non-opioid medication, epidural corticosteroid injections and disc surgery, but also for chemonucleolysis, which is no longer used in the UK NHS. These findings do not provide support for the effectiveness of opioid analgesia, which is widely used in this patient group, or activity restriction. They also suggest that less frequently used treatments, such as acupuncture, and experimental treatments, such as anti-inflammatory biological agents, may be effective. Stepped-care approaches to treatment for patients with sciatica are cost-effective relative to direct referral for surgery. Future research should include randomised controlled trials with concurrent economic evaluation of biological agents and acupuncture compared with placebo or with currently used treatments. Development of alternative economic modelling approaches to assess relative cost-effectiveness of treatment regimes, based on the above trial data, would also be beneficial.
The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
144 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper, we present the design, fabrication, and testing of a monolithic polymer Joule-Thomson microcryogenic cooler (MCC) cold stage. The MCC cold stages were fabricated monolithically on a wafer out of polyimide. The fabrication was based on surface micromachining technologies using electroplated copper as the sacrificial layers and polyimide as the structural material. The process consisted of multilayers of metallization, coating of polyimide, and the patterning on each layer. One of the key techniques enabling this monolithic approach was the development of the wafer-level 3-D interconnect for making high pressure (e.g., 10 atm) polymer fluid microchannels. To evaluate the performance of the MCC, a five-component fluid mixture designed for cooling from 300 to 200 K was used as a refrigerant. The cold tip reached 190 K under a refrigerant pressure ratio of 6.2:1.1 bar. The heat-lift at 200 K was measured to be 5.2 mW. [2013-0211]
    Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems 08/2014; 23(4):934-943. DOI:10.1109/JMEMS.2014.2301631 · 1.92 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Low back pain is debilitating and costly, especially for patients not responding to conservative therapy and requiring surgery. Our objective was to determine whether epidural steroid injections (ESI) have a surgery-sparing effect in patients with spinal pain. Systematic review and meta-analysis METHODS: Databases searched included Cochrane, PubMed, and EMBASE. The primary analysis evaluated RCTs in which treatment groups received ESI and control groups underwent control injections. Secondary analyses involved RCTs comparing surgery with ESI, and subgroup analyses of trials comparing surgery to conservative treatment in which the operative disposition of subjects who received epidural steroid injections were evaluated. Of 26 total studies included, the only studies evaluating the effect of ESI on need for surgery as a primary outcome examined the same patient cohort, providing moderate evidence that patients who received ESI were less likely to undergo surgery than those who received control treatment. For studies examining surgery as a secondary outcome, ESI demonstrated a trend to reduce the need for surgery for short-term (< 1 year) (risk ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.41-1.13; p = 0.14) but not long-term outcomes (≥ 1 year) (risk ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.77-1.19; p = 0.68). Secondary analyses provided low-level evidence suggesting that between one-third and half of patients considering surgery who undergo ESI can avoid surgery. Epidural steroid injections may provide a small surgery sparing effect in the short term compared to control injections, and reduce the need for surgery in some patients who would otherwise proceed to surgery. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society 10/2014; 15(2). DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2014.10.011 · 2.90 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Surgical management of back and leg pain is evolving and changing due to a better understanding of the patho-anatomy well correlated with its pathophysiology. Pain is better understood with in vivo visualization and probing of the pain generators using an endoscopic access rather than just relying on symptoms diagram and image correlation. This has resulted in a shared decision making involving patient and surgeon, focused on a broader spectrum of surgical as well as non-surgical treatments, and not just masking the pain generator. It has moved away from decisions based on diagnostic images alone, that, while noting the image alterations, cannot explain the pain experienced by each individual as images do not always show variations in nerve supply and patho-anatomy. The ability to isolate and visualize "pain" generators in the foramen and treating persistent pain by visualizing inflammation and compression of nerves, serves as the basis for transforaminal endoscopic (TFE) surgery. This has also resulted in better pre surgical planning with more specific and defined goals in mind. The "Inside out" philosophy of TFE surgery is safe and precise. It provides basic access to the disc and foramen to cover a large spectrum of painful pathologies.

Full-text

Download
58 Downloads
Available from
Jun 3, 2014