Guided migration of neural stem cells derived from human embryonic stem cells by an electric field.

Institute for Regenerative Cures, University of California Davis School of Medicine, California 95817, USA.
Stem Cells (Impact Factor: 7.7). 11/2011; 30(2):349-55. DOI: 10.1002/stem.779
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Small direct current (DC) electric fields (EFs) guide neurite growth and migration of rodent neural stem cells (NSCs). However, this could be species dependent. Therefore, it is critical to investigate how human NSCs (hNSCs) respond to EF before any possible clinical attempt. Aiming to characterize the EF-stimulated and guided migration of hNSCs, we derived hNSCs from a well-established human embryonic stem cell line H9. Small applied DC EFs, as low as 16 mV/mm, induced significant directional migration toward the cathode. Reversal of the field polarity reversed migration of hNSCs. The galvanotactic/electrotactic response was both time and voltage dependent. The migration directedness and distance to the cathode increased with the increase of field strength. (Rho-kinase) inhibitor Y27632 is used to enhance viability of stem cells and has previously been reported to inhibit EF-guided directional migration in induced pluripotent stem cells and neurons. However, its presence did not significantly affect the directionality of hNSC migration in an EF. Cytokine receptor [C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4)] is important for chemotaxis of NSCs in the brain. The blockage of CXCR4 did not affect the electrotaxis of hNSCs. We conclude that hNSCs respond to a small EF by directional migration. Applied EFs could potentially be further exploited to guide hNSCs to injured sites in the central nervous system to improve the outcome of various diseases.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is used in numerous clinical studies and considered an effective and versatile add-on therapy in neurorehabilitation. To date, however, the underlying neurobiological mechanisms remain elusive. In a rat model of tDCS, we recently observed a polarity-dependent accumulation of endogenous neural stem cells (NSCs) in the stimulated cortex. Based upon these findings, we hypothesized that tDCS may exert a direct migratory effect on endogenous NSCs towards the stimulated cortex. Using noninvasive imaging, we here investigated whether tDCS may also cause a directed migration of engrafted NSCs. Murine NSCs were labeled with superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide (SPIOs) and implanted into rat striatum and corpus callosum. MRI was performed (i) immediately after implantation and (ii) after 10 tDCS sessions of anodal or cathodal polarity. Sham-stimulated rats served as control. Imaging results were validated ex vivo using immunohistochemistry. Overall migratory activity of NSCs almost doubled after anodal tDCS. However, no directed migration within the electric field (i.e. towards or away from the electrode) could be observed. Rather, an undirected outward migration from the center of the graft was detected. Xenograft transplantation induced a neuroinflammatory response that was significantly enhanced following cathodal tDCS. This inflammatory response did not impact negatively on the survival of implanted NSCs. Data suggest that anodal tDCS increases the undirected migratory activity of implanted NSCs. Since the electric field did not guide implanted NSCs over large distances, previously observed polarity-dependent accumulation of endogenous NSCs in the cortex might have originated from local proliferation. Results enhance our understanding of the neurobiological mechanisms underlying tDCS, and may thereby help to develop a targeted and sustainable application of tDCS in clinical practice. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    NMR in Biomedicine 12/2014; 28(2). DOI:10.1002/nbm.3244 · 3.56 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Neural progenitor cell (NPC) replacement therapy is a promising treatment for neurodegenerative disorders including Parkinson's disease (PD). It requires a controlled directional migration and integration of NPCs, for example dopaminergic (DA) progenitor cells, into the damaged host brain tissue. There is, however, only limited understanding of how to regulate the directed migration of NPCs to the diseased or damaged brain tissues for the repair and regeneration. The aims of this study are to explore the possibility of using a physiological level of electrical stimulation to regulate the directed migration of ventral midbrain NPCs (NPC(vm)), and to investigate its potential regulation via GSK3β and associated downstream effectors. We tested the effects of direct-current (DC) electric fields (EFs) on the migration behaviors of the NPC(vm). A DC EF induced directional cell migration towards the cathode, namely electrotaxis. Reversal of the EF polarity triggered a sharp reversal of NPC(vm) electrotaxis. The electrotactic response was both time and EF voltage dependent. Pharmacologically inhibiting the canonical Wnt / GSK3β pathway significantly reduced the electrotactic response of NPC(vm), which is associated with the down-regulation of GSK3β phosphorylation, β-catenin activation and CLASP2 expression. This was further proved by RNA interference of GSK3β, which also showed a significantly reduced electrotactic response in association with reduced β-catenin activation and CLASP2 expression. In comparison, RNA interference of β-catenin slightly reduced electrotactic response and CLASP2 expression. Both pharmacological inhibition of Wnt / GSK3β and RNA interference of GSK3β / β-catenin clearly reduced the asymmetric redistribution of CLASP2 and its co-localization with α-tubulin. These results suggest that Wnt / GSK3β signaling contributes to the electrotactic response of NPC(vm) through the coordination of GSK3β phosphorylation, β-catenin activation, CLASP2 expression and asymmetric redistribution to the leading edge of the migrating cells.
    Experimental Neurology 09/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.09.014 · 4.62 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Physiological electric field (EF) is a potent guidance cue for many physiological development and pathological conditions. The EF induced cellular responses such as migration and proliferation, are considered to be regulated by multiple signaling pathways in a coordinated way. Unlike the signaling transduction regulating the cellular responses toward chemical gradients, the signaling network involved in electric stimulation shows a unique manner, combining the regulation of ion channels, membrane receptors and associated intracellular signaling pathways. This review shall discuss the cellular responses in EF, and summarize the primary signaling network activated during the EF-induced cellular response.
    The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology 09/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.biocel.2014.09.014 · 4.24 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Oct 13, 2014