PI-PLCβ1 gene copy number alterations in breast cancer.

Biosciences Laboratory, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Via P. Maroncelli 40, I-47014 Meldola (FC), Italy.
Oncology Reports (Impact Factor: 2.3). 11/2011; 27(2):403-8. DOI:10.3892/or.2011.1529
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Deregulation of signal transduction pathways frequently confers selective biological advantages to tumors. Phosphoinositides play an essential role in numerous cellular functions and, among the enzymes implicated in these processes, phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C β1 (PI-PLCβ1) is one of the key regulators. In the present study, a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) approach was used to investigate PI-PLCβ1 gene copy number alterations in various types of breast cancer differing in their invasiveness and proliferative activity, according to their mitotic index. At the molecular level, we also performed both real-time PCR and immunohistochemical analyses on PI-PLCβ1 to further investigate its expression in primary breast cancers. Finally, we analyzed the correlation between PI-PLCβ1 gene copy number and clinicopathological parameters. Our results show that most of our cases had aneusomies on the PI-PLCβ1 locus (20p12) and amplification of this specific region was the most frequent alteration observed. Our findings also indicate that the amplification of the region containing the PI-PLCβ1 gene was mostly related to the mitotic index, rather than to the invasion status. Finally, even though our case series is limited, PI-PLCβ1 gene amplification seems to be correlated to clinicopathological parameters.

0 0
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although age-adjusted cancer death rates have started to decline in the United States and other developed nations - thanks in large part to widespread screening programs that detect cancers at early, treatable stages - cancer in developing countries is on the rise. Ironically, rising life expectancy in those nations along with the adoption of 'Western' lifestyles will leave many more people vulnerable to cancer. Unfortunately, the early detection tools and treatment technology that have helped control cancer in wealthier lands are often not readily available in many other countries. Much of this increased cancer burden will take the form of cancers that affect women - not only breast, cervical, and other gynecologic cancers but colorectal cancer, lung cancer, and other malignancies related to tobacco. Physicians specializing in cancer care for women need to be alert to every opportunity to improve cancer screening and prevention among the growing, aging populations of less-developed countries. Less precise but less costly and more widely available screening techniques may save thousands more lives than the most sophisticated technology because low-cost programs can be applied widely instead of being reserved for a fortunate few. In addition, education and prevention efforts directed toward tobacco use need to be put in place to help stem an epidemic of tobacco-related cancers that has largely peaked in developed countries but looms ominously in the future of developing nations.
    International Journal of Gynecological Cancer 01/2004; 14(1):1-11. · 1.94 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Breast cancer emerges by a multistep process which can be broadly equated to transformation of normal cells via the steps of hyperplasia, premalignant change and in situ carcinoma. The elucidation of molecular interdependencies, which lead to development of primary breast cancer, its progression, and its formation of metastases is the main focus for new strategies targetted at prevention and treatment. Cytogenetic and molecular genetic analysis of breast cancer samples demonstrates that tumour development involves the accumulation of various genetic alterations including amplification of oncogenes and mutation or loss of tumour suppressor genes. Amplification of certain oncogenes with concomitant overexpression of the oncoprotein seems to be specific for certain histological types. Loss of normal tumour suppressor protein function can occur through sequential gene mutation events (somatic alteration) or through a single mutational event of a remaining normal copy, when a germline mutation is present. The second event is usually chromosome loss, mitotic recombination, or partial chromosome deletion. Chromosome loci 16q and 17p harbour tumour suppressor genes, which seem to be pathognomonic for the development or progression of a specific histological subtype. There are an overwhelming number of abnormalities that have been identified at the molecular level which fit the model of multistep carcinogenesis of breast cancer. When the functions of all of these genes are known and how they participate in malignant progression, we will have the tools for a more rational approach to diagnosis, prevention and treatment. This review deals only with the factors that are involved in the conversion of a normal breast cell into a malignant cell rather than those required for invasion and metastases. A key critical long-term step in the molecular analysis of breast cancer will be to link the specific molecular damage with the effects of environmental carcinogens.
    Journal of Molecular Medicine 07/1997; 75(6):429-39. · 4.77 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this review, we comment on the reasons for disagreement in the concepts, diagnosis and classifications of pre-invasive intraductal proliferations. In view of these disagreements, our proposal is to distinguish epithelial hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ and ductal carcinoma in situ, and to abandon the use of poorly reproducible categories, such as atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal intraepithelial neoplasia, followed by a number to indicate the degree of proliferation and atypia, as these are not practical for clinical decision making, nor for studies aimed at improving the understanding of breast cancer development. If there is doubt about the classification of an intraductal proliferation, a differential diagnosis and the reason for and degree of uncertainty should be given, rather than categorizing a proliferation as atypical.
    Breast cancer research: BCR 02/2003; 5(5):269. · 5.87 Impact Factor


Available from
Jun 20, 2013