Article

Concurrent Validity and Reliability of Retrospective Scoring of the Pediatric National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale

Division of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Colket Translational Research Building, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Stroke (Impact Factor: 6.02). 11/2011; 43(2):341-5. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.633305
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The Pediatric National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (PedNIHSS), an adaptation of the adult National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, is a quantitative measure of stroke severity shown to be reliable when scored prospectively. The ability to calculate the PedNIHSS score retrospectively would be invaluable in the conduct of observational pediatric stroke studies. The study objective was to assess the concurrent validity and reliability of estimating the PedNIHSS score retrospectively from medical records.
Neurological examinations from medical records of 75 children enrolled in a prospective PedNIHSS validation study were photocopied. Four neurologists of varying training levels blinded to the prospective PedNIHSS scores reviewed the records and retrospectively assigned PedNIHSS scores. Retrospective scores were compared among raters and to the prospective scores.
Total retrospective PedNIHSS scores correlated highly with total prospective scores (R(2)=0.76). Interrater reliability for the total scores was "excellent" (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.94-0.97). Interrater reliability for individual test items was "substantial" or "excellent" for 14 of 15 items.
The PedNIHSS score can be scored retrospectively from medical records with a high degree of concurrent validity and reliability. This tool can be used to improve the quality of retrospective pediatric stroke studies.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Abbas F Jawad, Jun 27, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
211 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Basilar artery occlusion has poor outcome in adults; little is known regarding outcomes in children. Whether intra-arterial treatments improve adult outcomes is controversial. Safety and efficacy of intra-arterial treatments in children are unknown. We report 5 cases of basilar artery occlusion and review published cases. We estimated National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and modified Rankin Score (mRS) of published cases, compared scores between non-intra-arterial treatments and intra-arterial treatments groups, and examined the correlation between NIHSS and mRS. Of our cases, 4 had good outcomes and 1 died. Of 63 published cases, 45 had no intra-arterial treatments and 18 had intra-arterial treatments. In the non-intra-arterial treatments group 24 had good outcomes. In the intra-arterial treatments group 13 had good outcomes. There was strong correlation between the NIHSS and the mRS. Children with basilar artery occlusion have better outcomes than adults. Certain children with basilar artery occlusion may be treated conservatively. A registry for childhood basilar artery occlusion is urgently needed.
    Journal of child neurology 05/2013; DOI:10.1177/0883073813488826 · 1.67 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Stroke is increasingly recognized as a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in children, and as a financial burden for families and society. Recent studies have identified and confirmed presumptive risk factors, and have identified novel associations with childhood arterial ischemic stroke. A better understanding of risk factors for stroke in children, which differ from the atherosclerotic risk factors in adults, is the first step needed to improve strategies for stroke prevention and intervention, and ultimately minimize the physical, mental, and financial burden of arterial ischemic stroke. Here, we discuss recent advances in research for selected childhood stroke risk factors, highlighting the progress made in our understanding of etiologic mechanisms and pathophysiology, and address the future directions for acute and long-term treatment strategies for pediatric stroke.
    Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 01/2014; 14(1):422. DOI:10.1007/s11910-013-0422-8 · 3.67 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background and Purpose-In adult stroke, the advent of thrombolytic therapy led to the development of primary stroke centers capable to diagnose and treat patients with acute stroke rapidly. We describe the development of primary pediatric stroke centers through preparation of participating centers in the Thrombolysis in Pediatric Stroke (TIPS) trial. Methods-We collected data from the 17 enrolling TIPS centers regarding the process of becoming an acute pediatric stroke center with capability to diagnose, evaluate, and treat pediatric stroke rapidly, including use of thrombolytic therapy. Results-Before 2004, <25% of TIPS sites had continuous 24-hour availability of acute stroke teams, MRI capability, or stroke order sets, despite significant pediatric stroke expertise. After TIPS preparation, >80% of sites now have these systems in place, and all sites reported increased readiness to treat a child with acute stroke. Use of a 1- to 10-Likert scale on which 10 represented complete readiness, median center readiness increased from 6.2 before site preparation to 8.7 at the time of site activation (P <= 0.001). Conclusions-Before preparing for TIPS, centers interested in pediatric stroke had not developed systematic strategies to diagnose and treat acute pediatric stroke. TIPS trial preparation has resulted in establishment of pediatric acute stroke centers with clinical and system preparedness for evaluation and care of children with acute stroke, including use of a standardized protocol for evaluation and treatment of acute arterial stroke in children that includes use of intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator.
    Stroke 06/2014; 45(7). DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.004919 · 6.02 Impact Factor