Ambulatory high-resolution manometry, lower esophageal sphincter lift and transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation.

Division of Gastroenterology, San Diego VA Health Care System and University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Neurogastroenterology and Motility (Impact Factor: 2.94). 11/2011; 24(1):40-6, e2. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01816.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) lift seen on high-resolution manometry (HRM) is a possible surrogate marker of the longitudinal muscle contraction of the esophagus. Recent studies suggest that longitudinal muscle contraction of the esophagus induces LES relaxation.
Our goal was to determine: (i) the feasibility of prolonged ambulatory HRM and (ii) to detect LES lift with LES relaxation using ambulatory HRM color isobaric contour plots.
In vitro validation studies were performed to determine the accuracy of HRM technique in detecting axial movement of the LES. Eight healthy normal volunteers were studied using a custom designed HRM catheter and a 16 channel data recorder, in the ambulatory setting of subject's home environment. Color HRM plots were analyzed to determine the LES lift during swallow-induced LES relaxation as well as during complete and incomplete transient LES relaxations (TLESR).
Satisfactory recordings were obtained for 16 h in all subjects. LES lift was small (2 mm) in association with swallow-induced LES relaxation. LES lift could not be measured during complete TLESR as the LES is not identified on the HRM color isobaric contour plot once it is fully relaxed. On the other hand, LES lift, mean 8.4 ± 0.6 mm, range: 4-18 mm was seen with incomplete TLESRs (n = 80).
Our study demonstrates the feasibility of prolonged ambulatory HRM recordings. Similar to a complete TLESR, longitudinal muscle contraction of the distal esophagus occurs during incomplete TLESRs, which can be detected by the HRM. Using prolonged ambulatory HRM, future studies may investigate the temporal correlation between abnormal longitudinal muscle contraction and esophageal symptoms.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Applying the 2012 Chicago Classification (CC) of esophageal motility disorders to pediatric patients is problematic as it relies upon adult-derived criteria. As shorter esophageal length and smaller esophago-gastric junction (EGJ) diameter may influence CC metrics, we explored the potential for age- and size-adjustment of diagnostic criteria.Methods We evaluated 76 high-resolution solid state impedance-manometry recordings in children referred for manometry (32M; mean age 9 ± 1 years) and 25 recordings from healthy adult subjects (7M; mean age 36 ± 2 years). CC metrics; integrated relaxation pressure (IRP4s, mmHg), contractile front velocity (CFV, cm/s), distal contractile integral (DCI, mmHg cm/s), distal latency (DL, s), and peristaltic break size (BS, cm) were derived for 10 liquid swallows using CC analysis software. Effects of age and size were examined using regression analysis.Key ResultsYounger patient age and shorter size correlated significantly with greater IRP4s (p < 0.05), shorter DL (p < 0.001) and smaller BS (p < 0.05). Standard diagnostic CC criteria were adjusted using the slope of the linear regression equation to define the age/size-related trend. Sixty-six percent of the pediatric cohort showed abnormal motility when applying standard CC criteria. Adjustment for age and size reduced this to 50% and 53% respectively, with the largest reduction being in the IRP4s- and DL-dependent disorders EGJ outflow obstruction and diffuse esophageal spasm (13% to 7% and 5% and 14% to 1 and 5%, respectively).Conclusions & InferencesCC metrics, particularly IRP4s and DL, are age and size dependent, and therefore, require adjustment to improve accuracy of diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders in children.
    Neurogastroenterology and Motility 07/2014; · 2.94 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The Chicago classification for esophageal motility disorders was designed for a 36-channel manometry system with sensors spaced at 1 cm. However, many motility laboratories outside the USA use catheters with a lower resolution in the segments outside the esophagogastric junction. Our aim was to investigate the effect of spatial resolution on the Chicago metrics and diagnosis.Methods In 20 healthy volunteers and 47 patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms, high-resolution manometric studies of the esophagus were retrospectively reanalyzed using the original 1-cm spacing in the segments outside the 7-cm esophagogastric junction segment, and again after manually increasing the spacing between sensors to 2, 3, and 4 cm (above the lower esophageal sphincter region). Measurements were analyzed in random order and the investigator was blinded to the outcome of the analyses performed in another resolution of the same patient. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and Kappa values were determined.Key ResultsThere was a very strong correlation between the 1-cm and 2-cm analysis for all Chicago metrics studied in healthy volunteers (ICCs: distal contractile integral 0.998; contractile front velocity (CFV) 0.964; distal latency 0.919; peristaltic break size 0.941). The 2-cm spacing analysis also correlated very well with the 1-cm analysis for the different Chicago diagnoses obtained in the patients (Kappa values ranging from 0.665 to 1.000). When the sensor spacing was increased to 3 and 4 cm, the correlation was reduced to moderate for the Chicago metrics, especially for break size and CFV of peristalsis.Conclusions & InferencesThe Chicago classification for esophageal motility disorders is still valid and the same normal values can be used when catheters with a slightly lower resolution are used (i.e., 2-cm vs 1-cm spacing). For larger sensor intervals, the classification and the normal values will need to be adjusted.
    Neurogastroenterology and Motility 04/2014; · 2.94 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: High-resolution manometry (HRM) allows nuanced evaluation of esophageal motor function, and more accurate evaluation of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function, in comparison with conventional manometry. Pathophysiologic correlates of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and esophageal peristaltic performance are well addressed by this technique. HRM may alter the surgical decision by assessment of esophageal peristaltic function and exclusion of esophageal outflow obstruction before antireflux surgery. Provocative testing during HRM may assess esophageal smooth muscle peristaltic reserve and help predict the likelihood of transit symptoms following antireflux surgery. HRM represents a continuously evolving new technology that compliments the evaluation and management of GERD.
    Gastroenterology clinics of North America 03/2014; 43(1):69-87. · 2.56 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Sep 11, 2014