Executive function predicts risk of falls in older adults without balance impairment

Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, CR-131, Portland, OR 97239 USA.
BMC Geriatrics (Impact Factor: 2). 11/2011; 11:74. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2318-11-74
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Executive dysfunction has previously been found to be a risk factor for falls. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between executive dysfunction and risk of falling and to determine if this association is independent of balance.
Participants were 188 community-dwelling individuals aged 65 and older. All participants underwent baseline and annual evaluations with review of health history, standardized neurologic examination, neuropsychological testing, and qualitative and quantitative assessment of motor function. Falls were recorded prospectively using weekly online health forms.
During 13 months of follow-up, there were 65 of 188 participants (34.6%) who reported at least one fall. Univariate analysis showed that fallers were more likely to have lower baseline scores in executive function than non-fallers (p = 0.03). Among participants without balance impairment we found that higher executive function z-scores were associated with lower fall counts (p = 0.03) after adjustment for age, sex, health status and prior history of falls using negative binomial regression models. This relationship was not present among participants with poor balance.
Lower scores on executive function tests are a risk factor for falls in participants with minimal balance impairment. However, this effect is attenuated in individuals with poor balance where physical or more direct motor systems factors may play a greater role in fall risk.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Forward reaching is an integral part of many essential daily activities. It is often performed while standing quietly or after standing up from a seated position. This study sought to determine how a preceding balance task and aging would affect the task performance and movement strategy. Twenty-two healthy young and 20 older adults participated in this study and performed forward reaching under two task conditions. In forward reach (FR), reaching was performed during quiet standing. In up-and-reach (UR), subjects stood up from a seated position and then reached forward. A motion analysis system was used to calculate the location of the center of mass (COM) and joint angles at the initial and final positions, and the finger, COM, and joint angular displacements during the reaching task. For both groups, UR was initiated in a more flexed posture and had a significantly shorter reach distance and greater ankle dorsiflexion angle, compared to FR. The location of the COM, however, did not differ between the two task conditions. Older adults were found to significantly slow down their downward and forward COM motions in UR but not young adults. These findings showed that a preceding balance task increased the task demand and required modifications in the movement strategy. For older adults, the impact of increased task demand was greater, and adopting a cautious strategy could help to complete the task safely.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Exercise interventions often do not combine physical and cognitive training. However, this combination is assumed to be more beneficial in improving walking and cognitive functioning compared to isolated cognitive or physical training. Methods A multicenter parallel randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare a motor to a cognitive-motor exercise program. A total of 182 eligible residents of homes-for-the-aged (n = 159) or elderly living in the vicinity of the homes (n = 23) were randomly assigned to either strength-balance (SB) or strength-balance-cognitive (SBC) training. Both groups conducted similar strength-balance training during 12 weeks. SBC additionally absolved computerized cognitive training of alertness and divided & selective attention. Outcomes were change in dual task costs of walking, physical performance, simple reaction time, executive functions, divided attention, fear of falling and fall rate. All randomized participants were analysed with an intention to treat approach. Results All 182 participants were randomized (mean age +/- SD: 81.5 +/- 7.3 years) and allocated to either SB (n = 98) or SBC (n = 84). The attrition rate was 14.3%, thus, 156 participants completed the intervention (SB n = 82; SBC n = 74). Interaction effects were observed for dual task costs of step length (preferred walking speed: F(1,174) = 4.94, p = 0.028, eta2 = 0.027, fast walking speed: F(1,166) = 6.14, p = 0.009, eta2 = 0.040) and dual task costs of the standard deviation of step length (F(1,166) = 6.14, p = 0.014, eta2 = 0.036), in favor of SBC. Significant interactions in favor of SBC were also seen in gait initiation (F(1,166) = 9.16, p = 0.003, eta2 = 0.052), 'reaction time' (F(1,180) = 5.243, p = 0.023, eta2 = 0.028) & 'missed answers' (F(1,180) = 11.839, p = 0.001, eta2 = 0.062) as part of the test for divided attention. Within-group comparison revealed significant improvements in dual task costs of walking (preferred speed; velocity (p = 0.002), step time (p = 0.018), step length (p = 0.028), fast speed; velocity (p < 0.001), step time (p = 0.035), step length (p = 0.001)), simple reaction time (p < 0.001), executive functioning (Trail making test B; p < 0.001), divided attention (p < 0.001), fear of falling (p < 0.001), and fall rate (p < 0.001). Conclusions Combining strength-balance training with specific cognitive training has a positive additional effect on dual task costs of walking, gait initiation, and divided attention. The findings further confirm previous research showing that strength-balance training improves executive functions and reduces falls. Trial registration: This trial has been registered under ISRCTN75134517
    BMC Geriatrics 12/2014; 14. DOI:10.1186/1471-2318-14-134 · 2.00 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The role of cognition is becoming increasingly central to our understanding of the complexity of walking gait. In particular, higher-level executive functions are suggested to play a key role in gait and fall-risk, but the specific underlying neurocognitive processes remain unclear. Here, we report two experiments which investigated the cognitive and neural processes underlying older adult gait and falls. Experiment 1 employed a dual-task (DT) paradigm in young and older adults, to assess the relative effects of higher-level executive function tasks (n-Back, Serial Subtraction and visuo-spatial Clock task) in comparison to non-executive distracter tasks (motor response task and alphabet recitation) on gait. All DTs elicited changes in gait for both young and older adults, relative to baseline walking. Significantly greater DT costs were observed for the executive tasks in the older adult group. Experiment 2 compared normal walking gait, seated cognitive performances and concurrent event-related brain potentials (ERPs) in healthy young and older adults, to older adult fallers. No significant differences in cognitive performances were found between fallers and non-fallers. However, an initial late-positivity, considered a potential early P3a, was evident on the Stroop task for older non-fallers, which was notably absent in older fallers. We argue that executive control functions play a prominent role in walking and gait, but the use of neurocognitive processes as a predictor of fall-risk needs further investigation. Citation: Walshe EA, Patterson MR, Commins S and Roche RAP (2015) Dual-task and electrophysiological markers of executive cognitive processing in older adult gait and fall-risk. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9:200.
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 05/2015; 9(200). DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00200 · 2.90 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 28, 2014