Article

Why mammography screening has not lived up to expectations from the randomised trials.

Dept 3343, The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Cancer Causes and Control (impact factor: 2.88). 11/2011; 23(1):15-21. DOI:10.1007/s10552-011-9867-8 pp.15-21
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We analysed the relation between tumour sizes and stages and the reported effects on breast cancer mortality with and without screening in trials and observational studies. The average tumour sizes in all the trials suggest only a 12% reduction in breast cancer mortality, which agrees with the 10% reported in the most reliable trials. Recent studies of tumour sizes and tumour stages show that screening has not lowered the rate of advanced cancers. In agreement with this, recent observational studies of breast cancer mortality have failed to find an effect of screening. In contrast, screening leads to serious harms in healthy women through overdiagnosis with subsequent overtreatment and false-positive mammograms. We suggest that the rationale for breast screening be urgently reassessed by policy-makers. The observed decline in breast cancer mortality in many countries seems to be caused by improved adjuvant therapy and breast cancer awareness, not screening. We also believe it is more important to reduce the incidence of cancer than to detect it 'early.' Avoiding getting screening mammograms reduces the risk of becoming a breast cancer patient by one-third.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
54 Views

Keywords

'early.' Avoiding
 
adjuvant therapy
 
average tumour sizes
 
breast cancer awareness
 
breast cancer mortality
 
breast cancer patient
 
breast screening
 
cancers
 
false-positive mammograms
 
healthy women
 
observational studies
 
observed decline
 
policy-makers
 
recent observational studies
 
Recent studies
 
screening mammograms
 
serious harms
 
subsequent overtreatment
 
tumour sizes
 
tumour stages