Effect of bismuth breast shielding on radiation dose and image quality in coronary CT angiography.

Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital, 622 West 168th Street PH 10-203A, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology (Impact Factor: 2.94). 11/2011; 19(1):100-8. DOI: 10.1007/s12350-011-9473-x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) is associated with high radiation dose to the female breasts. Bismuth breast shielding offers the potential to significantly reduce dose to the breasts and nearby organs, but the magnitude of this reduction and its impact on image quality and radiation dose have not been evaluated.
Radiation doses from CCTA to critical organs were determined using metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors positioned in a customized anthropomorphic whole-body dosimetry verification phantom. Image noise and signal were measured in regions of interest (ROIs) including the coronary arteries.
With bismuth shielding, breast radiation dose was reduced 46%-57% depending on breast size and scanning technique, with more moderate dose reduction to the heart, lungs, and esophagus. However, shielding significantly decreased image signal (by 14.6 HU) and contrast (by 28.4 HU), modestly but significantly increased image noise in ROIs in locations of coronary arteries, and decreased contrast-to-noise ratio by 20.9%.
While bismuth breast shielding can significantly decrease radiation dose to critical organs, it is associated with an increase in image noise, decrease in contrast-to-noise, and changes tissue attenuation characteristics in the location of the coronary arteries.

Download full-text


Available from: Bin Cheng, Mar 17, 2015
1 Follower
32 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: The purposes of this essay are to describe the effects of bismuth breast shielding on radiation exposure of the breast and posterior chest wall and to present arguments for and against the use of breast shields. Conclusion: Breast tissue may receive substantial radiation doses during CT examinations. Bismuth shields effectively reduce breast exposure at the expense of increased noise and artifacts. Because bismuth shields reduce radiation transmission in all directions, posterior-to-anterior irradiation results in wasted exposure of posterior tissues. Similar breast radiation reductions can be achieved without shielding by globally reducing tube current. In general, more advanced methods of reducing exposure, including dose modulation and iterative reconstruction techniques, are superior if available.
    American Journal of Roentgenology 03/2013; 200(3):503-7. DOI:10.2214/AJR.12.9997 · 2.73 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study is to compare the image quality of coronary CT angiography performed with and without breast shields. This study involved a retrospective cohort of 72 women with possible angina who underwent 64-MDCT retrospective ECG-gated coronary CT angiography at a single academic tertiary medical center. Images of 36 women scanned while wearing bismuth-coated latex breast shields and 36 control subjects scanned without shields, matched by heart rate and body mass index, were graded on a standardized Likert scale for image quality, stenosis, and plaque by two independent board-certified readers blinded to breast shields. Seventy-two patients (mean [± SD] age, 53 ± 9 years) were included. The pre scan heart rate, body mass index, and Agatston score did not differ between groups. The median estimated radiation dose was 13.4 versus 16.1 mSv for those with and without breast shields (p = 0.003). For shielded versus unshielded scans, 86% versus 83% of coronary segments were rated excellent or above average (p = 0.4), median image quality was 2.0 for both groups, mean signal was 474 ± 75 and 452 ± 91 HU (p = 0.27), mean noise was 33.9 ± 8.5 and 29.8 ± 8.3 HU (p = 0.04), and median signal-to-noise ratio was 14.4 and 14.7 (p = 0.56), respectively. Breast shields for women undergoing coronary CT angiography slightly increased noise but did not negatively affect signal, signal-to-noise ratio, quality, or interpretability. Breast shield use warrants further study.
    American Journal of Roentgenology 03/2013; 200(3):529-36. DOI:10.2214/AJR.11.8302 · 2.73 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Effective dose (ED) is a widely used metric for comparing ionizing radiation burden between different imaging modalities, scanners, and scan protocols. In computed tomography (CT), ED can be estimated by performing scans on an anthropomorphic phantom in which metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) solid-state dosimeters have been placed to enable organ dose measurements. Here a statistical framework is established to determine the sample size (number of scans) needed for estimating ED to a desired precision and confidence, for a particular scanner and scan protocol, subject to practical limitations. The statistical scheme involves solving equations which minimize the sample size required for estimating ED to desired precision and confidence. It is subject to a constrained variation of the estimated ED and solved using the Lagrange multiplier method. The scheme incorporates measurement variation introduced both by MOSFET calibration, and by variation in MOSFET readings between repeated CT scans. Sample size requirements are illustrated on cardiac, chest, and abdomen-pelvis CT scans performed on a 320-row scanner and chest CT performed on a 16-row scanner. Sample sizes for estimating ED vary considerably between scanners and protocols. Sample size increases as the required precision or confidence is higher and also as the anticipated ED is lower. For example, for a helical chest protocol, for 95% confidence and 5% precision for the ED, 30 measurements are required on the 320-row scanner and 11 on the 16-row scanner when the anticipated ED is 4 mSv; these sample sizes are 5 and 2, respectively, when the anticipated ED is 10 mSv. Applying the suggested scheme, it was found that even at modest sample sizes, it is feasible to estimate ED with high precision and a high degree of confidence. As CT technology develops enabling ED to be lowered, more MOSFET measurements are needed to estimate ED with the same precision and confidence.
    Medical Physics 04/2014; 41(4):042102. DOI:10.1118/1.4868693 · 2.64 Impact Factor
Show more