Article

Selection of Arterial Input Function for Postprocessing of Cerebral CT Perfusion in Chronic Unilateral High-grade Stenosis or Occlusion of the Carotid or Middle Cerebral Artery

Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan.
Academic radiology (Impact Factor: 2.08). 11/2011; 19(1):8-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.09.004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We evaluated the effect of the arterial input function (AIF) on computed tomography perfusion (CTP) in patients with unilateral high-grade stenosis or occlusion in the carotid artery or middle cerebral artery without acute stroke.
CTP datasets were retrospectively postprocessed using the same venous output function and different AIF selections: the second segment of the anterior cerebral artery (A2 AIF), the second segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) on the lesion side (affected M2 AIF), and M2 on the contralateral side (nonaffected M2 AIF). We measured CTP values in the region of interest (ROI) in the bilateral MCA territory and evaluated the lesion-to-contralateral ratios.
The mean and standard deviations of cerebral blood flow (CBF) on the normal side were similar to previously reported data only when using "non-affected M2 AIF." Selecting an "affected M2 AIF" overestimated the CBF and shortened the mean transit time (MTT) in normal and lesion areas. Selecting an "A2 AIF" may cause overestimation of CBF in the normal side in patients with nonaffected-side A1 hypoplasia or occlusion. The sensitivity of the CBF ratio or MTT ratio to detect these unilateral cerebrovascular diseases was 100% using "nonaffected M2 AIF for bilateral MCA ROIs" and 70% (CBF ratio) and 90% (MTT ratio) using "respective AIF."
The use of "nonaffected AIF for the bilateral MCA ROIs" was found to be the best of these AIF-ROI combinations in patients with chronic unilateral carotid or M1 severe stenosis or occlusion.

0 Followers
 · 
126 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess absolute quantification of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance perfusion (MRP) comparing with computed tomography perfusion (CTP) in patients with unilateral stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively post-processed MRP in 20 patients with unilateral occlusion or stenosis of >79% at the internal carotid artery or the middle cerebral artery (MCA). Absolute quantification of MRP was performed after applying the following techniques: cerebrospinal fluid removal, vessel removal, and automatic segmentation of brain to calculate the scaling factors to convert relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) values to absolute values. For comparison between MRP and CTP, we manually deposited regions of interest in bilateral MCA territories at the level containing the body of the lateral ventricle. RESULTS: The correlation between MRP and CTP was best for mean transit time (MTT) (r=0.83), followed by cerebral blood flow (CBF) (r=0.52) and cerebral blood volume (CBV) (r=0.43). There was no significant difference between CTP and MRP for CBV, CBF, and MTT on the lesion side, the contralateral side, the lesion-contralateral differences, or the lesion-to-contralateral ratios (P>0.05). The mean differences between MRP and CTP were as follows: CBV -0.57mL/100g, CBF 2.50mL/100g/min, and MTT -0.90s. CONCLUSION: Absolute quantification of MRP is possible. Using the proposed method, measured values of MRP and CTP had acceptable linear correlation and quantitative agreement.
    European journal of radiology 08/2012; 81(12). DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.07.018 · 2.16 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives To evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of CT-perfusion (CTP) by finding the optimal artery for the arterial input function (AIF) and re-evaluating the necessity of the venous output function (VOF). Methods Forty-four acute ischaemic stroke patients who underwent non-enhanced CT, CTP and CT-angiography using 256-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) were evaluated. The anterior cerebral artery (ACA), middle cerebral artery (MCA), internal carotid artery (ICA) and basilar artery were selected as the AIF. Subsequently the resulting area under the time–enhancement curve of the AIF (AUCAIF) and quantitative perfusion measurements were analysed by repeated measures ANOVA and subsequently the paired t test. To evaluate reproducibility we examined if the VOF could be deleted by comparing the perfusion measurements using versus not using the VOF (paired t test). Results The AUCAIF and perfusion measurements resulting from the different AIFs showed significant group differences (all P
    European Radiology 11/2012; 23(5). DOI:10.1007/s00330-012-2731-8 · 4.34 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Tracer delay-sensitive perfusion algorithms in CT perfusion (CTP) result in an overestimation of the extent of ischemia in thromboembolic stroke. In diagnosing delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), delayed arrival of contrast due to vasospasm may also overestimate the extent of ischemia. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of tracer delay-sensitive and tracer delay-insensitive algorithms for detecting DCI. From a prospectively collected series of aSAH patients admitted between 2007-2011, we included patients with any clinical deterioration other than rebleeding within 21 days after SAH who underwent NCCT/CTP/CTA imaging. Causes of clinical deterioration were categorized into DCI and no DCI. CTP maps were calculated with tracer delay-sensitive and tracer delay-insensitive algorithms and were visually assessed for the presence of perfusion deficits by two independent observers with different levels of experience. The diagnostic value of both algorithms was calculated for both observers. Seventy-one patients were included. For the experienced observer, the positive predictive values (PPVs) were 0.67 for the delay-sensitive and 0.66 for the delay-insensitive algorithm, and the negative predictive values (NPVs) were 0.73 and 0.74. For the less experienced observer, PPVs were 0.60 for both algorithms, and NPVs were 0.66 for the delay-sensitive and 0.63 for the delay-insensitive algorithm. Test characteristics are comparable for tracer delay-sensitive and tracer delay-insensitive algorithms for the visual assessment of CTP in diagnosing DCI. This indicates that both algorithms can be used for this purpose.
    Neuroradiology 01/2015; 57(5). DOI:10.1007/s00234-015-1486-8 · 2.37 Impact Factor