Article

Predicting Cardiac Arrest on the Wards A Nested Case-Control Study

Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Chest (Impact Factor: 7.13). 11/2011; 141(5):1170-6. DOI: 10.1378/chest.11-1301
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Current rapid response team activation criteria were not statistically derived using ward vital signs, and the best vital sign predictors of cardiac arrest (CA) have not been determined. In addition, it is unknown when vital signs begin to accurately detect this event prior to CA.
We conducted a nested case-control study of 88 patients experiencing CA on the wards of a university hospital between November 2008 and January 2011, matched 1:4 to 352 control subjects residing on the same ward at the same time as the case CA. Vital signs and Modified Early Warning Scores (MEWS) were compared on admission and during the 48 h preceding CA.
Case patients were older (64 ± 16 years vs 58 ± 18 years; P = .002) and more likely to have had a prior ICU admission than control subjects (41% vs 24%; P = .001), but had similar admission MEWS (2.2 ± 1.3 vs 2.0 ± 1.3; P = .28). In the 48 h preceding CA, maximum MEWS was the best predictor (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.77; 95% CI, 0.71-0.82), followed by maximum respiratory rate (AUC 0.72; 95% CI, 0.65-0.78), maximum heart rate (AUC 0.68; 95% CI, 0.61-0.74), maximum pulse pressure index (AUC 0.61; 95% CI, 0.54-0.68), and minimum diastolic BP (AUC 0.60; 95% CI, 0.53-0.67). By 48 h prior to CA, the MEWS was higher in cases (P = .005), with increasing disparity leading up to the event.
The MEWS was significantly different between patients experiencing CA and control patients by 48 h prior to the event, but includes poor predictors of CA such as temperature and omits significant predictors such as diastolic BP and pulse pressure index.

0 Followers
 · 
132 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An observational study was carried out to give a descriptive overview of acute poisoning in Mater Dei Hospital. The aim of the study was to investigate characteristics of patients with suspected acute poisoning by creating a database combining clinical and laboratory data. Clinical and laboratory data of 677 patients aged 14 years and over, presenting with suspected acute poisoning, over a nine month period in 2010 were gathered for analysis and graphical presentation. The peak age for males and females with acute poisoning was 20-29 years whilst another peak was observed for females in the 50-59 years group. Males predominated in the younger age groups (below 50 years). Out of 677 patients with suspected acute poisoning, 350/677 (52%) were diagnosed with acute poisoning and 327/677 (48%) were found to have an alternative diagnosis. The most common poison agents were prescription drugs, of which benzodiazepines and tricyclic antidepressants were the most common (43% and 20% respectively). Opiates were the most commonly detected (59%) drug of abuse and paracetamol was the most commonly ingested analgesic (36.6%). None of the patients died in the hospital. 21% (73/350) and 5% (19/350) of patients with confirmed poisoning required a monitored bed and intensive care respectively. The study demonstrated trends in patient characteristics, commonly used agents and outcomes of patients with acute poisoning in the local setting. Introduction Suspected acute poisoning is a common condition presenting to the emergency department. Management depends on an accurate diagnosis based on history, physical examination and toxicological analysis. An observational study was carried out to give a descriptive overview of acute poisoning in Mater Dei Hospital.
    Malta Medical Journal 11/2014; 26(3).
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Measurement of the respiratory rate is an important instrument for assessing the severity of acute disease. The respiratory rate is often not measured in routine practice because its clinical utility is inadequately appreciated. In Germany, documentation of the respiratory rate is obligatory when a patient with pneumonia is hospitalized. This fact has enabled us to study the prognostic significance of the respiratory rate in reference to a large medical database.
    Deutsches Ärzteblatt International 07/2014; 111(29-30):481-7. DOI:10.3238/arztebl.2014.0503 · 3.61 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Rationale: Most ward risk scores were created using subjective opinion in individual hospitals and only utilize vital signs. Objectives: To develop and validate a risk score using commonly collected electronic health record (EHR) data. Methods: All patients hospitalized on the wards in five hospitals were included in this observational cohort study. Discrete-time survival analysis was used to predict the combined outcome of cardiac arrest (CA), intensive care unit (ICU) transfer, or death on the wards. Laboratory results, vital signs, and demographics were utilized as predictor variables. The model was developed in the first 60% of the data at each hospital and then validated in the remaining 40%. The final model was compared to the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Measurements and Main Results: A total of 269,999 patient admissions were included, with 424 CAs, 13,188 ICU transfers, and 2,840 deaths occurring during the study period. The derived model was more accurate than the MEWS in the validation dataset for all outcomes (AUC 0.83 vs. 0.74 for CA, 0.79 vs. 0.73 for ICU transfer, 0.94 vs. 0.90 for death, and 0.82 vs. 0.76 for the combined outcome; p-value<0.01 for all comparisons). This accuracy improvement was seen across all hospitals. Conclusions: We developed an accurate ward risk stratification tool using commonly collected EHR variables in a large multicenter dataset. Further study is needed to determine whether implementation in real-time would improve patient outcomes.
    American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 08/2014; 190(6). DOI:10.1164/rccm.201406-1022OC · 11.99 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
3 Downloads
Available from