Article

ACR Appropriateness Criteria (R) Right Lower Quadrant Pain-Suspected Appendicitis

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Journal of the American College of Radiology: JACR (Impact Factor: 2.28). 11/2011; 8(11):749-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.07.010
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The diagnostic imaging of patients presenting with right lower quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis may be organized according to age and gender and to the presence or absence of "classic" signs and symptoms of acute appendicitis. Among adult patients presenting with clinical signs of acute appendicitis, the sensitivity and specificity of CT are greater than those of ultrasound, with improved performance when CT is performed with intravenous contrast. The use of rectal contrast has been associated with decreased time in the emergency department. Computed tomography has also been shown to reduce cost and negative appendectomy rates. Both CT and ultrasound are also effective in the identification of causes of right lower quadrant pain unrelated to appendicitis. Among pediatric patients, the sensitivity and specificity of graded-compression ultrasound can approach those of CT, without the use of ionizing radiation. Performing MRI after inconclusive ultrasound in pregnant patients has been associated with sensitivity and specificity of 80% to 86% and 97% to 99%, respectively. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

1 Follower
 · 
207 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective To estimate the rate and risk of appendix non-visualization and alternative diagnoses made with MRI for suspected appendicitis in pregnant women. Study design We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive pregnant women who underwent MRI for suspected appendicitis at a single center from 2007-2012. Data on clinical presentation, imaging, and surgical pathology were extracted from electronic medical records. Odds ratios estimated risk factors for non-diagnosis. Radiologic diagnoses were identified and rates of diagnoses calculated. Subgroup analysis was performed among women who underwent initial imaging with ultrasound. Results Over the 5-year period, 171 pregnant women underwent MRI for suspected appendicitis. The rate of non-visualization was 30.9% (n=53). Of the remaining 118 women with a visualized appendix, 18 had imaging findings consistent with appendicitis and underwent appendectomy. Twelve cases of appendicitis were confirmed on pathology (66.7%). Women with non-visualization of the appendix on MRI were more likely to be beyond the first trimester (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.0-4.5). Seventy-four women had pathology diagnosed on MRI (43.3%). In the group of 43 women who had a non-diagnostic ultrasound prior to MRI, the rate of subsequent diagnostic MRI was 65% (n=28). Conclusions MRI yields a high diagnostic rate and accuracy in pregnant women with suspected appendicitis, and also provides alternative diagnoses to guide further management. Given the high rate of appendix non-visualization on ultrasound reported in the literature, we recommend MRI as the imaging modality of choice for this population in settings where MRI is readily available.
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 10/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.002 · 3.97 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Evidence indicates that irritable bowel syndrome can occur after gastroenteritis. However, little is known about its incidence after diverticulitis. This study was designed to identify the incidence and risk factors of irritable bowel syndrome after diverticulitis in Korea. A survey regarding irritable bowel syndrome was performed in patients allocated to the cases hospitalized for acute diverticulitis and controls hospitalized for non-gastrointestinal disorders between January 2007 and June 2012. Patients meeting criteria for irritable bowel syndrome before hospitalization or with a history of bowel resection were excluded for analysis. Response rate of telephone interviews was 28.1 % (139 of 494) and 73.3 % (220 of 300) in cases and controls, respectively. After exclusion, 102 patients in the cases and 205 patients in the controls were analyzed. At 31 months median follow-up, irritable bowel syndrome had developed in 13 patients (12.8 %) in the cases and 11 patients (5.4 %) in the controls with significant statistical difference (p = 0.02). No clinical difference was seen between the two groups. No clinical factor was significant for the development of irritable bowel syndrome after diverticulitis, and no independent factor was associated with the development of irritable bowel syndrome. Among the 13 patients who developed post-diverticulitis irritable bowel syndrome, the diarrhea-predominant type (53.9 %) was most common. A higher incidence of irritable bowel syndrome after diverticulitis was evident in this study. However, no clinical feature for prediction of its development after diverticulitis was found. Further large-scale analysis will be needed to generalize this result.
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease 09/2014; 29(11). DOI:10.1007/s00384-014-2015-7 · 2.42 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Appendicitis is a common condition presenting to the emergency department (ED). Increasingly emergency physicians (EP) are using bedside ultrasound (BUS) as an adjunct diagnostic tool. Our objective is to investigate the test characteristics of BUS for the diagnosis of appendicitis and identify components of routine ED workup and BUS associated with the presence of appendicitis. Patients four years of age and older presenting to the ED with suspected appendicitis were eligible for enrollment. After informed consent was obtained, BUS was performed on the subjects by trained EPs who had undergone a minimum of one-hour didactic training on the use of BUS to diagnose appendicitis. They then recorded elements of clinical history, physical examination, white blood cell count (WBC) with polymophonuclear percentage (PMN), and BUS findings on a data form. We ascertained subject outcomes by a combination of medical record review and telephone follow-up. A total of 125 subjects consented for the study, and 116 had adequate image data for final analysis. Prevalence of appendicitis was 40%. Mean age of the subjects was 20.2 years, and 51% were male. BUS was 100% sensitive (95% CI 87-100%) and 32% specific (95% CI 14-57%) for detection of appendicitis, with a positive predictive value of 72% (95% CI 56-84%), and a negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI 52-100%). Assuming all non-diagnostic studies were negative would yield a sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 81%. Subjects with appendicitis had a significantly higher occurrence of anorexia, nausea, vomiting, and a higher WBC and PMN count when compared to those without appendicitis. Their BUS studies were significantly more likely to result in visualization of the appendix, appendix diameter >6mm, appendix wall thickness >2mm, periappendiceal fluid, visualization of the appendix tip, and sonographic Mcburney's sign (p<0.05). In subjects with diagnostic BUS studies, WBC, PMN, visualization of appendix, appendix diameter >6mm, appendix wall thickness >2mm, periappendiceal fluid were found to be predictors of appendicitis on logistic regression. BUS is moderately useful for appendicitis diagnosis. We also identified several components in routine ED workup and BUS that are associated with appendicitis generating hypothesis for future studies.
    The western journal of emergency medicine 11/2014; 15(7):808-15. DOI:10.5811/westjem.2014.9.21491

Full-text

Download
70 Downloads
Available from
May 22, 2014