In vitro antibacterial activity of different endodontic irrigants

Department of Operative Dentistry, University of Pavia, Piazzale Golgi 3, Pavia, Italy.
Dental Traumatology (Impact Factor: 1.21). 11/2011; 28(3):205-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2011.01074.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to compare in vitro the antibacterial activity of Tetraclean (mixture of doxycycline, citric acid and polypropylene glycol), Niclor 5 (5.25% sodium hypochlorite solution), Cloreximid (0.2% chlorhexidine and 0.2% cetrimide solution) and hydrogen peroxide 12 volumes on three endodontic pathogens associated with primary endodontic infections. Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus mutans and Staphylococcus aureus strains were selected to evaluate the antibacterial activity of endodontic irrigants by the agar disc-diffusion test.
Paper discs were saturated with each one of the test solutions (at room temperature and preheating at 50°C) and placed onto culture agar-plates preadsorbed with bacterial cells and further incubated for 24 h at 37°C. The growth inhibition zones around each irrigant were recorded and compared for each bacterial strain. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were applied to compare the various groups.
At room temperature, Tetraclean showed significantly higher inhibition of bacteria growth than all other irrigants tested. Preheating at 50°C significantly increased growth inhibition for all the groups tested. At 50°C, hydrogen peroxide 12 volumes and Tetraclean showed significantly higher efficacy than all other irrigants tested.
50°C-preheated hydrogen peroxide 12 volumes and Tetraclean showed highest inhibition of the bacterial growth.

Download full-text


Available from: Claudio Poggio, Jul 27, 2015
  • Source
    • "These authors employed confocal microscopy to evaluate bacterial cell viability after the exposure of oral bacteria biofilm to NaOCl and CHX, and showed that NaOCl was pronouncedly more effective than CHX to kill bacteria cells organized in biofilm (Ordinola-Zapata et al., 2012). Other studies that have compared the effectiveness of NaOCl and CHX against E. faecalis showed that CHX was as effective as, or even more effective than NaOCl, but these studies did not use a method based on antimicrobial activity against biofilms (Vianna and Gomes, 2009), or used unreliable methods such as the agar diffusion test (Poggio et al., 2012; Mattigatti et al., 2012; Sassone et al., 2008). However, it has been clearly shown that bacteria are usually organized in biofilm structures or within necrotic pulp tissue remnants in the root canal system (Baldasso et al., 2012; Vera et al., 2012; Ricucci and Siqueira, 2010; Ricucci et al., 2009), and these tissues/structures may protect bacterial cells against antimicrobial action. "
    10/2014; 6(6):64-69. DOI:10.5897/JDOH2014.0128
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: The occurrence of multi-antibiotic resistance among enterococci is a prevalent clinical problem worldwide and continues to get serious due to the lack of efficient therapeutic options by the time. In this regards, prokaryotic antimicrobial peptides with bactericidal or bacteriostatic activity which are directed against bacterial strains closely related to producer strains looks one of the promising alternative to conventional antibiotics. Methods: The antibiotic susceptibility pattern of 20 clinical isolates of enterococci was evaluated and subsequently the isolates were screened for antibacterial activity against three different indicator strains. The efficacy of potential bacteriocinogenic isolates were assayed against multi-antibiotic resistant Enterococcus spp. by comparative minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Results: Antibiotic resistant pattern of enterococcal isolates demonstrated that multi-antibiotic resistant to conventional antibiotics were significantly high and the prevalent pattern of resistance was combination of gentamicin, streptomycin, chloramphenicol and vancomycin. In addition, the data from comparative MIC showed the noticeable activity of selected potential bacteriocinogenic strains against pathogenic enterococci. Conclusion: The present survey may address the potential applicability of antimicrobial peptides in alleviating the problems of antibiotic resistance.
    Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin 01/2011; 1(2):75-79. DOI:10.5681/apb.2011.011 · 0.88 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Reactive oxygen species (ROS) can attack a diverse range of targets to exert antimicrobial activity, which accounts for their versatility in mediating host defense against a broad range of pathogens. Most ROS are formed by the partial reduction of molecular oxygen. Four major ROS are recognized comprising: superoxide (O2 •(-) ), hydrogen peroxide (H2 O2 ), hydroxyl radical ((•) OH), and singlet oxygen ((1) O2 ), but they display very different kinetics and levels of activity. The effects of O2 •(-) and H2 O2 are less acute than those of (•) OH and (1) O2 , since the former are much less reactive and can be detoxified by endogenous antioxidants (both enzymatic and non-enzymatic) that are induced by oxidative stress. In contrast, no enzyme can detoxify (•) OH or (1) O2 , making them extremely toxic and acutely lethal. The present review will highlight the various methods of ROS formation and their mechanism of action. Antioxidant defenses against ROS in microbial cells and the use of ROS by antimicrobial host defense systems are covered. Antimicrobial approaches primarily utilizing ROS comprise both bactericidal antibiotics, and non-pharmacological methods such as photodynamic therapy, titanium dioxide photocatalysis, cold plasma and medicinal honey. A brief final section covers, reactive nitrogen species, and related therapeutics, such as acidified nitrite and nitric oxide releasing nanoparticles. One sentence summary. Reactive oxygen species are involved in cell signaling and disease causing damages, and in the antimicrobial arena mediate killing via bactericidal antibiotics, photodynamic inactivation, titania photocatalysis, cold plasma, medicinal honey, and nitric oxide releasing nanoparticles. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    FEMS microbiology reviews 06/2013; 37(6). DOI:10.1111/1574-6976.12026 · 13.81 Impact Factor
Show more