Article
Use of self-expandable stents in the treatment of bariatric surgery leaks: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Division of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Gastrointestinal endoscopy (impact factor:
6.71).
10/2011;
75(2):287-93.
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.010
pp.287-93
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (1)
-
Article: Removable and repositionable covered metal self-expandable stents for leaks after upper gastrointestinal surgery: experiences in a tertiary referral hospital.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakages are severe complications of upper gastrointestinal surgery with serious morbidity and mortality. Until recently, only abscess drainage was possible. Since 2007, removable and repositionable covered metal self-expandable stents (RReCoMSeS) have been used in our hospital to cover leaks. METHODS: Patients with postsurgical gastrointestinal leaks treated with RReCoMSeS between January 2007 and March 2010 were retrospectively evaluated and described. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were treated with RReCoMSeS (totally covered Choo/Hanaro and partially covered Endoflex stents). Included patients had anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy (15) and bariatric surgery (11). Overall successful sealing of the leak occurred in 81 % (including multiple procedures). In total 33 RReCoMSeS were used (mean 1.3 stents and 1.7 procedures per patient). Twenty-one of 33 RReCoMSeS succeeded in sealing the leak (64 %). Migration occurred in 24 % RReCoMSeS, and 9 % disintegrated. One stent (3 %) caused a perforation. CONCLUSIONS: RReCoMSeS are a safe alternative for treating postsurgical leaks in the upper gastrointestinal tract. In 81 % of patients and with 64 % of the inserted stents, leaks were sealed successfully, with few complications. Fewer stents per patient were needed thanks to their repositionability. Stent migration is a major problem.Surgical Endoscopy 02/2013; · 4.01 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
189 relevant articles
67 patients
7 studies
bariatric surgery
bariatric surgery leaks
Cochrane Register
Controlled Trials
Endoscopic placement
Harbord bias estimators
patient outcomes
pooled proportion
Pooled proportions
publication bias
radiographic evidence
self-expandable stents
SES treatment
Small retrospective studies
stent removal
successful endoscopic stent removal
successful leak closures