Article

Geographic access to US Neurocritical Care Units registered with the Neurocritical Care Society.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Room 1654H ML 0769, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0769, USA.
Neurocritical Care (Impact Factor: 2.6). 11/2011; 16(2):232-40. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-011-9644-2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Neurocritical care provides multidisciplinary, specialized care to critically ill neurological patients, yet an understanding of the proportion of the population able to rapidly access specialized Neurocritical Care Units (NCUs) in the United States is currently unknown. We sought to quantify geographic access to NCUs by state, division, region, and for the US as a whole. In addition, we examined how mode of transportation (ground or air ambulance), and prehospital transport times affected population access to NCUs.
Data were obtained from the Neurocritical Care Society (NCS), US Census Bureau and the Atlas and Database of Air Medical Services. Empirically derived prehospital time intervals and validated models estimating prehospital ground and air travel times were used to calculate total prehospital times. A discrete total prehospital time interval was calculated for each small unit of geographic analysis (block group) and block group populations were summed to determine the proportion of Americans able to reach a NCU within discrete time intervals (45, 60, 75, and 90 min). Results are presented for different geographies and for different modes of prehospital transport (ground or air ambulance).
There are 73 NCUs in the US using ground transportation alone, 12.8, 20.5, 27.4, and 32.6% of the US population are within 45, 60, 75, and 90 min of an NCU, respectively. Use of air ambulances increases access to 36.8, 50.4, 60, and 67.3 within 45, 60, 75, and 90 min, respectively. The Northeast has the highest access rates in the US using ground ambulances and for 45, 60, and 75 min transport times with the addition of air ambulances. At 90 min, the West has the highest access rate. The Southern region has the lowest ground and air access to NCUs access rates for all transport times.
Using NCUs registered with the NCS, current geographic access to NCUs is limited in the US, and geographic disparities in access to care exist. While additional NCUs may exist beyond those identified by the NCS database, we identify geographies with limited access to NCUs and offer a population-based planning perspective on the further development of the US neurocritical care system.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Lori Shutter, Jul 01, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
161 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2012; 19:1099-1108 © 2012 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine ABSTRACT: Objectives:  The regionalization of medical services has resulted in improved outcomes and greater compliance with existing guidelines. For certain "time-critical" conditions intimately associated with emergency medicine, early intervention has demonstrated mortality benefits. For these conditions, then, appropriate triage within a regionalized system at first diagnosis is paramount, ideally occurring in the field by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel. Therefore, EMS ground transport access is an important metric in the ongoing evaluation of a regionalized care system for time-critical emergency services. To our knowledge, no studies have demonstrated how methodologies for calculating EMS ground transport access differ in their estimates of access over the same study area for the same resource. This study uses two methodologies to calculate EMS ground transport access to trauma center care in a single study area to explore their manifestations and critically evaluate the differences between the methodologies. Methods:  Two methodologies were compared in their estimations of EMS ground transport access to trauma center care: a routing methodology (RM) and an as-the-crow-flies methodology (ACFM). These methodologies were adaptations of the only two methodologies that had been previously used in the literature to calculate EMS ground transport access to time-critical emergency services across the United States. The RM and ACFM were applied to the nine Level I and Level II trauma centers within the province of Ontario by creating trauma center catchment areas at 30, 45, 60, and 120 minutes and calculating the population and area encompassed by the catchments. Because the methodologies were identical for measuring air access, this study looks specifically at EMS ground transport access. Results:  Catchments for the province were created for each methodology at each time interval, and their populations and areas were significantly different at all time periods. Specifically, the RM calculated significantly larger populations at every time interval while the ACFM calculated larger catchment area sizes. This trend is counterintuitive (i.e., larger catchment should mean higher populations), and it was found to be most disparate at the shortest time intervals (under 60 minutes). Through critical evaluation of the differences, the authors elucidated that the ACFM could calculate road access in areas with no roads and overestimates access in low-density areas compared to the RM, potentially affecting delivery of care decisions. Conclusions:  Based on these results, the authors believe that future methodologies for calculating EMS ground transport access must incorporate a continuous and valid route through the road network as well as use travel speeds appropriate to the road segments traveled; alternatively, we feel that variation in methods for calculating road distances would have little effect on realized access. Overall, as more complex models for calculating EMS ground transport access become used, there needs to be a standard methodology to improve and to compare it to. Based on these findings, the authors believe that this should be the RM.
    Academic Emergency Medicine 09/2012; 19(9):E1099-E1108. DOI:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01440.x · 2.20 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:: Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is the cause of 5-10% of strokes annually in the United States. OBJECTIVE:: To study the incidence and mortality trendsof admissions of SAH from 1979 to 2008 using a nationally representative sample of all non-federal acute-care hospitals in the US: The National Hospital Discharge Survey. METHODS:: The sample was obtained from the hospital discharge records according to the International Classification of Disease, 9 Revision, Clinical Modification 430. RESULTS:: We reviewed data on approximately one billion hospitalizations in the United States over a 30-year study period and identified 612,500 cases of SAH, which was more common in women (relative risk [RR] 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-1.72) and non-white persons than white persons (RR 1.46, 95%CI 1.4-1.5). The estimated incidence rate of admission after SAH was 7.2-9.0 per 100,000/year and did not significantly change over the study period. Overall, in-hospital mortality after SAH fell from 30% during the period from 1979-1983 to 20% during the sub-period from 2004-2008 (p=0.03) and was lower in larger treating hospitals. The average days of care for SAH hospitalizations decreased, but the rate of discharge to long-term care facilities increased. CONCLUSION:: The incidence rate of admission after SAH has remained stable over the last 30 years. Total deaths and in-hospital mortality after SAH have decreased significantly. In-hospital mortality after SAH is lower in larger treating hospitals.
    Neurosurgery 04/2013; 73(2). DOI:10.1227/01.neu.0000430290.93304.33 · 3.03 Impact Factor
  • Annals of emergency medicine 07/2013; 63(5). DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.06.021 · 4.33 Impact Factor