Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC): oncological outcomes and prognostic factors in a large multicentre series

University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
BJU International (Impact Factor: 3.53). 11/2011; 110(1):76-83. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10690.x
Source: PubMed


Study Type – Outcomes (cohort)
Level of Evidence 2b
What's known on the subject? and What does the study add?
About 80% of RCCs have clear cell histology, and consistent data are available about the clinical and histological characteristics of this histological subtype. Conversely, less attention has been dedicated to the study of non-clear cell renal tumours Specifically, published data show that chromophobe RCC (ChRCC) have often favourable pathological stages and better nuclear grades as well as a lower risk of metastasizing compared with clear cell RCC (ccRCC). Patients with ChRCC were shown to have significantly higher cancer-specific survival (CSS) probabilities compared with ccRCC. However, an independent prognostic role of RCC histotype was not confirmed in some large multicenter series and only a few studies have focused on the oncological outcomes of ChRCC.
The present study is one of the few to evaluate cancer-related outcomes of ChRCC and represents to our knowledge the largest series of ChRCCs. Consequently, the present findings may assist in elucidating the natural history of surgically treated ChRCC. The present study confirms that ChRCCs have good prognosis and a low tendency to progress and metastasize. Only 1.3% of patients presented with distant metastases at diagnosis, and the 5- and 10-year CSS were 93% and 88.9%, respectively. However, although ChRCCs are generally characterised by an excellent prognosis, we observed that patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancers as well as those with sarcomatoid differentiation have a poor outcome. The study also investigated prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and CSS for this RCC histotype. The definition of outcome predictors can be useful for patient counselling, planning of follow-up strategies, and patient selection for clinical trials. In the present study, gender, clinical T stage, pathological T stage, and presence of sarcomatoid differentiation were significantly associated with RFS and CSS at multivariable analysis. We also identified N/M stage as an independent predictor of CSS. Notably, as Fuhrman grade was not an independent predictor of cancer-related outcomes, the present study confirms that this histological variable is not a reliable prognostic factor for ChRCC.

Download full-text


Available from: Alchiede Simonato, Sep 30, 2015
1 Follower
49 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article reviews recent developments in the use of systemic targeted therapies for the treatment of advanced clear and nonclear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The genetic/molecular basis of each form of RCC is discussed and current treatments and clinical trials are described. The treatment of advanced RCC continues to be a major challenge for uro-oncologists. The rapid growth in therapeutic options has brought much needed improvements in overall and progression-free survival, although durable complete responses remain elusive. The recent identification of mutations in genes involved in chromatin remodeling will likely lead to the investigation of whether components of this critical process can also be valid therapeutic targets in clear cell RCC. Similarly, efforts to decipher the molecular mechanisms underlying nonclear cell variants of RCC are beginning to engender novel therapeutic strategies directed against these rarer forms of kidney cancer. Despite the availability of multiple treatment options, several challenges remain: selecting the best first-line or subsequent therapy for a given patient, the optimal sequencing of the various agents available, designing trials with appropriate comparison arms and endpoints, and identifying well tolerated and effective drug combinations. Agents targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor and mammalian target of rapamycin pathways remain the mainstay in the management of metastatic RCC. Ongoing and future studies are expected to facilitate the development of therapeutic regimens that incorporate agents with improved tolerability and enhanced efficacy by continuing to capitalize on the strides made by basic and translational scientists in uncovering the mechanisms underlying the various forms of RCC.
    Current opinion in oncology 02/2012; 24(3):284-90. DOI:10.1097/CCO.0b013e328351c646 · 4.47 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We report a rare case of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). A 45-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with severe right back pain. Abdominal computed tomography revealed a 20 cm bleeding tumor in the right kidney. We performed transarterial embolization (TAE) of the right renal artery and capsular branches. After TAE, the condition of the patient deteriorated, resulting in multiple organ failure. On day 6 after admission, open right nephrectomy was performed through a transperitoneal approach. He soon recovered from multiple organ failure and was discharged from hospital 31 days postoperatively. We confirmed that the preoperative organ failures caused intra-abdominal hypertension, and thus attributed the life-threatening symptoms to ACS. This represents the first report of renal cell carcinoma presenting as ACS.
    04/2012; 2(2):93-96. DOI:10.1007/s13691-012-0069-3
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Each histologic type of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has different pathologic and clinical parameters; however, the independent role of histologic type in outcome prediction remains contested. Most studies show relevance for outcome of each histologic type when correlated with survival by univariate analysis, whereas few studies show differences in outcome once other key prognostic factors, such as stage and grade, are considered. These studies highlight the challenges to prove outcome relevance. Despite the contested independent value of type for outcome prediction, separation of RCC into types is well accepted and can be substantiated on clinical, pathologic, molecular, and general outcome differences.
    Urologic Clinics of North America 05/2012; 39(2):119-32, v. DOI:10.1016/j.ucl.2012.02.001 · 1.20 Impact Factor
Show more