Diagnostic Implications of Informant Disagreement for Manic Symptoms

Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Putnam Hall-South Campus, Stony Brook, New York 11794-8790, USA.
Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology (Impact Factor: 2.93). 10/2011; 21(5):399-405. DOI: 10.1089/cap.2011.0007
Source: PubMed


This study examines diagnoses that occur in an outpatient sample when both parent and teacher endorse significant manic symptoms and when only a parent observes them. We hypothesized that the diagnosis of mania/bipolar (BP) disorder would occur when there is parent/teacher concordance on high mania symptom scores.
Subjects were 911 5-18-year-old psychiatrically diagnosed youths with caregiver and teacher completed Child Mania Rating Scales (CMRSs) and Achenbach parent and teacher forms. Parent-teacher concordance on the CMRS was defined as both informants ≥75 percentile on the CMRS; discordance on the CMRS was defined as parent ≥75 percentile and teacher ≤25 percentile. Logistic regression examined factors associated with a child's parent and teacher ratings concordant for high CMRS total scores.
Correlation between parent CMRS (CMRS-P) and teacher CMRS (CMRS-T) scores was r=0.27 (p<0.000). Correlation between the CMRS-P and the Child Behavior Checklist "bipolar/dysregulation" phenotype was r=0.757 and between the CMRS-T and Teacher Report Form "bipolar/dysregulation" phenotype was r=0.786. A total of 66 (7.3%) of the 911 children were diagnosed with BP I (n=20) or II (n=3) or BP disorder not otherwise specified (BPNOS, n=43). If the CMRS-P score was ≥15, 14.7% (vs. 4.4%) had any BP (odds ratio: 3.6; 95% confidence interval: 2.1, 6.2). Teacher agreement or disagreement did not add to diagnostic accuracy for students with BP I or II. BPNOS was more common in children with concordant high CMRS-P and CMRS-T ratings (10.5% vs. 4.8%) but the difference was not statistically significant. However, logistic regression indicated 10-fold greater odds of both parents and teachers, providing high CMRS ratings among children who were diagnosed with externalizing disorders (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, or any combination of these). Children with internalizing disorders (anxiety and depressive disorders) were 3.7 times more likely to have discordant CMRS-P/CMRS-T ratings.
Parent and teacher concordance on high mania rating scale scores was most associated with externalizing disorders, and discordance was most associated with internalizing disorders.

Download full-text


Available from: Gabrielle A Carlson, Feb 10, 2014
33 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objectives of this study were to examine how often clinicians judged youths or caregivers to not be credible informants, to identify the associated features of youth or caregiver credibility, and to examine credibility's impact on the validity of mood and behavior checklists. Clinicians often have the experience of talking to a parent or a youth and judging that the credibility of the information offered is unusually poor. Little is known about the correlates of poor credibility or about the extent to which credibility changes the validity of commonly used checklists. Interviewers rated the credibility of 646 youths aged 5-18 and their primary caregivers after completing a Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia. Ratings and diagnoses were blind to the behavior checklists completed by caregivers, youths, and teachers. A subset of youths also had intelligent quotient tests and behavioral observations available. Caregivers were perceived as more credible on average than youths, though this dropped sharply with adolescents. Caregiver credibility was higher for better functioning families, more credible youths, younger youths, and more educated caregivers; it was unrelated to caregiver mood symptoms or being the mother. Youth credibility was strongly connected to age, cognitive ability, caregiver credibility, and independent observations of youth behavior. Credibility ratings markedly altered the validity of checklists compared with interview ratings, diagnoses, or cross-informant criteria. Clinicians' judgments about informant credibility are associated with different characteristics for youths versus caregivers, though youth age is important to both. Credibility affects the validity of information from checklists measured against several different independent criteria.
    Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology 10/2011; 21(5):407-15. DOI:10.1089/cap.2011.0032 · 2.93 Impact Factor

  • Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology 10/2011; 21(5):385-7. DOI:10.1089/cap.2011.2159 · 2.93 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Modest agreement between parent- and teacher-reports of child behavior is a common finding. This study examines diagnoses made when significant disparity occurs in parent- and teacher-reports of rage behaviors. Methods: Parents and teachers of 911 5-18 year-olds referred for psychiatric outpatient services completed rating scales and received a psychiatric evaluation blind to parent- and teacher-ratings. Children with rage outbursts (n=431, 47.2%) were assessed for diagnosis, family history, and clinical variables. Results: Children were 12.0 (3.6) years; 26.5% were female. Bipolar disorder was rare (11.2%) in this sample; however, in children with parent- and teacher-reported rages, severe mood dysregulation was the most common condition (54.4%). In parent only reported rages, anxiety disorders were most common (40.6%) diagnoses, and in teacher only reported rages, learning/language disorders were the most common (46.0%) diagnoses. Conclusion: The context in which a rage outburst occurs may impact the diagnosis; however, diagnosis alone does not explain this difficult and impairing behavior.
    The Israel journal of psychiatry and related sciences 01/2012; 49(1):44-51. · 0.79 Impact Factor
Show more