Discrepancies between survey and administrative data on the use of mental health services in the general population: findings from a study conducted in Québec

Département de psychiatrie de l'université de Montréal, C,P, 6138 Succ, Centre-Ville, Montréal, H3C 3J7, Canada.
BMC Public Health (Impact Factor: 2.32). 10/2011; 11:837. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-837
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Population surveys and health services registers are the main source of data for the management of public health. Yet, the validity of survey data on the use of mental health services has been questioned repeatedly due to the sensitive nature of mental illness and to the risk of recall bias. The main objectives of this study were to compare data on the use of mental health services from a large scale population survey and a national health services register and to identify the factors associated with the discrepancies observed between these two sources of data.
This study was based on the individual linkage of data from the cycle 1.2 of the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS-1.2) and from the health services register of the Régie de l'assurance maladie du Québec (RAMQ). The RAMQ is the governmental agency managing the Quebec national health insurance program. The analyses mostly focused on the 637 Quebecer respondents who were recorded as users of mental health services in the RAMQ and who were self-reported users or non users of these services in the CCHS-1.2.
Roughly 75%, of those recorded as users of mental health services users in the RAMQ's register did not report using mental health services in the CCHS-1.2. The odds of disagreement between survey and administrative data were higher in seniors, individuals with a lower level of education, legal or de facto spouses and mothers of young children. They were lower in individuals with a psychiatric disorder and in frequent and more recent users of mental health services according to the RAMQ's register.
These findings support the hypotheses that social desirability and recall bias are likely to affect the self-reported use of mental health services in a population survey. They stress the need to refine the investigation of mental health services in population surveys and to combine survey and administrative data, whenever possible, to obtain an optimal estimation of the population need for mental health care.


Available from: Richard Boyer, Jul 01, 2014
1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Anxiety disorders are common mental health problems in the community, and primary care has a predominant role in the diagnosis and treatment of these conditions. While most patients are treated with pharmacotherapy, clinical practice guidelines recommendations also comprise psychotherapy interventions. The aims of this study were: (a) to examine access to psychotherapy for anxiety disorders in a sample of primary care patients; and (b) to examine individual factors associated with access to psychotherapy. Data were drawn from the “Dialogue” project, a large primary care study conducted in 67 primary care clinics. After a mental health screening, patients with anxiety or depressive symptoms were invited to participate in a telephone/Web structured interview to assess Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders–Fourth Edition (DSM–IV) anxiety and depressive disorders, as well as service utilization. In our sample, a total of 740 adults met DSM–IV criteria for panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder or social anxiety disorder in the past 12 months. Nearly half of the respondents with anxiety disorders had received a form of psychotherapy or counselling in the past 12 months, and 20% of respondents reported at least 12 sessions with the same health care professional. Individual correlates of access to psychotherapy, based on a logistic regression model, included being a woman, less than 60 years old, a university education level, supplementary insurance and having a comorbid depression episode. These findings emphasize the need to improve access to psychotherapy for individuals with anxiety disorders in primary care and to reduce disparities in access to psychotherapy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved)
    05/2014; 55(2):60. DOI:10.1037/a0036317
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Information on older offenders' mental health service (MHS) used before and after sentence is sparse. We therefore aimed to determine the 1-year prevalence of MHS use before sentence, and the likelihood and predictors of MHS use in the 5-year post-sentence period by first-time older adult offenders (≥45 years). Pre- and post-sentence MHS use by a cohort of 1,853 first-time offenders over 45 years in Western Australia was determined through whole-population linked administrative data. Logistic regression models compared the 1-year pre-sentence MHS contacts between offenders and matched non-offenders. Cox proportional hazards regression models identified the socio-demographic, offending and pre-sentence health service variables that determined post-sentence MHS use. Older offenders were six times more likely to have used MHSs than non-offenders before sentence. Substance use was the most commonly treated disorder. Non-custodial offenders were twice more likely than prisoners to have been treated for any mental disorder and substance use disorders, and violent offenders were four times more likely to have attempted self-harm than non-violent offenders before being sentenced. The strongest predictors of post-sentence MHS contact were past psychiatric diagnosis in offenders with a pre-sentence MHS contact, and pre-sentence hospitalisation for attempted self-harm or physical illness, or being a male in those without. Discontinuity in MHS use after sentence by over half of the offenders with a prior contact was prominent. Better detection and treatment of mental disorders in older offenders to ensure continuity of care at all transition points through age-sensitive correctional and community-based MHSs is needed.
    Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 01/2015; DOI:10.1007/s00127-015-1008-3 · 2.58 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Most Canadian newcomers are admitted in the economic, family, or refugee class, each of which has its own selection criteria and experiences. Evidence has shown various risks for mental health disorders across admission classes, but the respective service-use patterns for people in these classes are unknown. In this study, we compared service use for nonpsychotic mental health disorders by newcomers in various admission classes with that of long-term residents (i.e., Canadian-born persons or immigrants before 1985) in urban Ontario. In this population-based matched cross-sectional study, we linked health service databases to the Ontario portion of the Citizenship and Immigration Canada database. Outcomes were mental health visits to primary care physicians, mental health visits to psychiatrists, and emergency department visits or hospital admissions. We measured service use for recent immigrants (those who arrived in Ontario between 2002 and 2007; n = 359 673). We compared service use by immigrants in each admission class during the first 5 years in Canada with use by age- and sex-matched long-term residents. We measured likelihood of access to each service and intensity of use of each service using conditional logistic regression and negative binomial models. Economic and family class newcomers were less likely than long-term residents to use primary mental health care. The use of primary mental health care by female refugees did not differ from that of matched long-term residents, but use of such care by male refugees was higher (odds ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.09-1.19). Immigrants in all admission classes were less likely to use psychiatric services and hospital services for mental health care. Exceptions were men in the economic and family classes, whose intensity of hospital visits was similar to that of matched long-term residents. Immigrants in all admission classes generally used less care for nonpsychotic disorders than longterm residents, although male refugees used more primary care. Future research should examine how mental health needs align with service use, particularly for more vulnerable groups such as refugees.