CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

Ottawa Methods Centre, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada.
International Journal of Surgery (London, England) (Impact Factor: 1.65). 01/2012; 10(1):28-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.10.001
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not optimal. Without transparent reporting, readers cannot judge the reliability and validity of trial findings nor extract information for systematic reviews. Recent methodological analyses indicate that inadequate reporting and design are associated with biased estimates of treatment effects. Such systematic error is seriously damaging to RCTs, which are considered the gold standard for evaluating interventions because of their ability to minimise or avoid bias. A group of scientists and editors developed the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement to improve the quality of reporting of RCTs. It was first published in 1996 and updated in 2001. The statement consists of a checklist and flow diagram that authors can use for reporting an RCT. Many leading medical journals and major international editorial groups have endorsed the CONSORT statement. The statement facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of RCTs. During the 2001 CONSORT revision, it became clear that explanation and elaboration of the principles underlying the CONSORT statement would help investigators and others to write or appraise trial reports. A CONSORT explanation and elaboration article was published in 2001 alongside the 2001 version of the CONSORT statement. After an expert meeting in January 2007, the CONSORT statement has been further revised and is published as the CONSORT 2010 Statement. This update improves the wording and clarity of the previous checklist and incorporates recommendations related to topics that have only recently received recognition, such as selective outcome reporting bias. This explanatory and elaboration document-intended to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of the CONSORT statement-has also been extensively revised. It presents the meaning and rationale for each new and updated checklist item providing examples of good reporting and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies. Several examples of flow diagrams are included. The CONSORT 2010 Statement, this revised explanatory and elaboration document, and the associated website ( should be helpful resources to improve reporting of randomised trials.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The goal of this document is to update the original OARSI recommendations specifically for the design, conduct, and reporting of clinical trials that target symptom or structure modification among individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA). To develop recommendations for the design, conduct, and reporting of clinical trials for knee OA we initially drafted recommendations through an iterative process. Members of the working group included representatives from industry and academia. After the working group members reviewed a final draft, they scored the appropriateness for recommendations. After the members voted we calculated the median score among the nine members of the working group who completed the score. The document includes 25 recommendations regarding randomization, blocking and stratification, blinding, enhancing accuracy of patient-reported outcomes (PRO), selecting a study population and index knee, describing interventions, patient-reported and physical performance measures, structural outcome measures, biochemical biomarkers, and reporting recommendations. In summary, the working group identified 25 recommendations that represent the current best practices regarding clinical trials that target symptom or structure modification among individuals with knee OA. These updated recommendations incorporate novel technologies (e.g., magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) and strategies to address the heterogeneity of knee OA. Copyright © 2015 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 05/2015; 23(5):747-760. DOI:10.1016/j.joca.2015.03.005 · 4.66 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A cancer diagnosis elicits greater distress than any other medical diagnosis, and yet very few studies have evaluated the efficacy of structured online self-help therapeutic programs to alleviate this distress. This study aims to assess the efficacy over time of an internet Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (iCBT) intervention ('Finding My Way') in improving distress, coping and quality of life for individuals with a recent diagnosis of early stage cancer of any type. The study is a multi-site Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) seeking to enrol 188 participants who will be randomised to either the Finding My Way Intervention or an attention-control condition. Both conditions are delivered online; with 6 modules released once per week, and an additional booster module released one month after program-completion. Participants complete online questionnaires on 4 occasions: at baseline (immediately prior to accessing the modules); post-treatment (immediately after program-completion); then three and six months later. Primary outcomes are general distress and cancer-specific distress, with secondary outcomes including Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), coping, health service utilisation, intervention adherence, and user satisfaction. A range of baseline measures will be assessed as potential moderators of outcomes. Eligible participants are individuals recently diagnosed with any type of cancer, being treated with curative intent, aged over 18 years with sufficient English language literacy, internet access and an active email account and phone number. Participants are blinded to treatment group allocation. Randomisation is computer generated and stratified by gender. Compared to the few prior published studies, Finding My Way will be the first adequately powered trial to offer an iCBT intervention to curatively treated patients of heterogeneous cancer types in the immediate post-diagnosis/treatment period. If found efficacious, Finding My Way will assist with overcoming common barriers to face-to-face therapy in a cost-effective and accessible way, thus helping to reduce distress after cancer diagnosis and consequently decrease the cancer burden for individuals and the health system. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613000001796 16.10.13.
    BMC Cancer 04/2015; 15(1):328. DOI:10.1186/s12885-015-1322-x · 3.32 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cancer and inflammation are closely related and an exacerbated inflammatory process can lead to tumor progression and a worse prognosis for the patient with cancer. Scientific literature has shown evidence that n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) have anti-inflammatory action, and for this reason could be useful as an adjuvant in the treatment of some cancers. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was conducted until September, 2014, to evaluate the effects of n-3 PUFA on inflammatory mediators in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Clinical trials were systematically searched in three electronic databases and screening reference lists. Random meta-analysis model was used to calculate the overall and stratified effect sizes. Nine trials, representing 475 patients with CRC, evaluated effects of n-3 PUFA on cytokines (n = 6) and/or acute phase proteins (n = 5) levels. n-3 PUFA reduce the levels of IL-6 (SMD -2.34; 95% CI -4.37, -0.31; p = 0.024) and increase albumin (SMD 0.31; 95% CI 0.06, 0.56; p = 0.014) in overall analyses. In stratified analyses, reduction in IL-6 levels occurs in surgical patients that received 0.2 g/kg of fish oil parenterally at postoperative period (SMD -0.65; 95% CI -1.06, -0.24; p = 0.002), while, increase in albumin concentration occurs in surgical patients that received ≥ 2.5 g/d of EPA + DHA orally at preoperative period (SMD 0.34; 95% CI 0.02, 0.66; p = 0.038). In patients undergoing chemotherapy, the supplementation of 0.6 g/d of EPA + DHA during 9 week reduces CRP levels (SMD -0.95; 95% CI -1.73, -0.17; p = 0.017), and CRP/albumin ratio (SMD -0.95; 95% CI -1.73, -0.18; p = 0.016). The results suggest benefits on some inflammatory mediators with the use of n-3 PUFA on CRC patients, but these benefits are specific to certain supplementation protocols involving duration, dose and route of administration, and also, the concomitant anti-cancer treatment adopted. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.
    Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) 04/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2015.04.013 · 3.94 Impact Factor


Available from