Popular or Unpopular? Therapists’ Use of Structured Interviews and Their Estimation of Patient Acceptance

University of Basel.
Behavior therapy (Impact Factor: 2.85). 12/2011; 42(4):634-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.02.003
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT An accurate diagnosis is an important precondition for effective psychotherapeutic treatment. The use of structured interviews provides the gold standard for reliable diagnosis. Suppiger et al. (2009) showed that structured interviews have a high acceptance among patients. On a scale from 0 (not at all satisfied) to 100 (totally satisfied) patients rated overall satisfaction with a structured interview at M=86.55. Nevertheless, therapists rarely seem to use structured interviews in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to assess how frequently therapists use structured interviews in daily practice. Secondly, we hypothesized that therapists underestimate patient acceptance of structured interviews. As a third goal, we explored further reasons why therapists choose not to use structured interviews. We conducted an online survey of 1,927 psychiatrists and psychotherapists in Switzerland and asked them how frequently they used structured interviews and how they estimated patient satisfaction with these interviews. Furthermore, we asked therapists why they chose to use or not use structured interviews. Therapists reported using structured interviews on average with about 15% of their patients. Furthermore, therapists estimated significantly lower patient acceptance than patients themselves indicated (M(therapist)=49.41, M(patient)=86.55). Our data suggest lack of familiarity with these instruments as well as an overestimation of the utility of open clinical interviews as further reasons for not using structured interviews.

Download full-text


Available from: Jürgen Margraf, Sep 28, 2015
68 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Unresolved questions exist concerning diagnosis of ADHD. First, some studies suggest a potential overdiagnosis. Second, compared with the male-female ratio in the general population (3:1), many more boys receive ADHD treatment compared with girls (6-9:1). We hypothesized that this occurs because therapists do not adhere to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; DSM-IV) and International Classification of Diseases (10th rev.; ICD-10) criteria. Instead, we hypothesized that, in accordance with the representativeness heuristic, therapists might diagnose attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) if a patient resembles their concept of a prototypical ADHD child, leading therapists to overlook certain exclusion criteria. This may result in overdiagnosis. Furthermore, as ADHD is more frequent in males, a boy might be seen as a more prototypical ADHD child and might therefore receive an ADHD diagnosis more readily than a girl would. We sent a case vignette to 1,000 child psychologists, psychiatrists, and social workers and asked them to give a diagnosis. Four versions of the vignette existed: Vignette 1 (ADHD) fulfilled all DSM-IV/ICD-10 criteria of ADHD. Vignettes 2-4 (non-ADHD) included several ADHD symptoms but stated other ADHD criteria were nonfulfilled. Therefore, an ADHD diagnosis could not be given. Furthermore, boy and girl versions of each vignette were created. In Vignettes 2-4 (non-ADHD), 16.7% of therapists diagnosed ADHD. In the boy version of these vignettes, therapists diagnosed ADHD around 2 times more than they did with the girl vignettes. Therapists do not adhere strictly to diagnostic manuals. Our study suggests that overdiagnosis of ADHD occurs in clinical routine and that the patient's gender influences diagnosis considerably. Thorough diagnostic training might help therapists to avoid these biases.
    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 12/2011; 80(1):128-38. DOI:10.1037/a0026582 · 4.85 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sowohl unter Experten als auch in der Öffentlichkeit wird oft vermutet, dass das Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit- und Hyperaktivitätssyndrom (ADHS) überdiagnostiziert wird. Dennoch gibt es hierzu kaum empirische Befunde. Aktuelle Ergebnisse der hier dargestellten repräsentativen Befragung von Kinder- und Jugendpsychotherapeuten und -psychiatern liefern jedoch erstmals empirische Belege dafür, dass ADHS zu häufig diagnostiziert wird. Die Befunde zeigen, dass Jungen bei identischem Symptombild häufiger eine ADHS-Diagnose gestellt bekommen als Mädchen. Eine fälschliche ADHS-Diagnose zieht zudem die Empfehlung einer medikamentösen und psychotherapeutischen Behandlung nach sich. Als Erklärung für diese diagnostischen Fehlurteile wird diskutiert, dass Therapeuten – wie bei anderen Alltagsentscheidungen auch – in der Diagnosesituation Heuristiken einsetzen. Verbreitet sind dabei die Repräsentativitäts- und die Verfügbarkeitsheuristik. Eine klare Orientierung an Diagnosekriterien und die Anwendung standardisierter Befragungsinstrumente helfen, solche Fehler zu vermeiden.
    Psychotherapeut 01/2012; 57(1):77-89. DOI:10.1007/s00278-011-0883-7 · 0.78 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Rating scales are useful for evidence-based assessment of youth psychopathology. However, it is not known whether these scales contribute information beyond that which clinicians gather without them. This study examined agreement between chart diagnoses and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) for 82 community mental health clinic clients. Agreement was low, suggesting that the CBCL was not redundant with clinicians' clinical impressions. These findings suggest that use of an instrument like the CBCL could potentially improve clinician diagnostic accuracy; future research should examine how best to utilize these scales in the diagnostic process and how to train clinicians in their use.
    Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 08/2012; 40(5). DOI:10.1007/s10488-012-0436-6 · 3.44 Impact Factor
Show more