This article addresses two major areas concerned with the evolving understanding of the construct of intellectual disability. The first part of the article discusses current answers to five critical questions that have revolved around the general question, "What is Intellectual Disability?" These five are what to call the phenomenon, how to explain the phenomenon, how to define the phenomenon and determine who is a member of the class, how to classify persons so defined and identified, and how to establish public policy regarding such persons. The second part of the article discusses four critical issues that will impact both our future understanding of the construct and the approach taken to persons with intellectual disability. These four critical issues relate to the conceptualisation and measurement of intellectual functioning, the constitutive definition of intellectual disability, the alignment of clinical functions related to diagnosis, classification, and planning supports, and how the field resolves a number of emerging epistemological issues.
"Their placement meant that they had already been diagnosed with ID. ID is a multidimensional state of human functioning with significant limitations in intellectual functioning and adaptive behaviour (Schalock 2011). The control group was composed of 13 individuals with similar chronological age (5 female, 8 male; mean age 025.07, "
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: This study focused on prospective memory in persons with intellectual disability
and age-matched controls. Persons with intellectual disability have limited
prospective memory function. We investigated prospective memory with words
and pictures as cues at encoding and retrieval. Prospective and episodic memory
was estimated from Prospective Memory Game performance. Pictures at retrieval
were important for prospective memory in particular in the intellectual disability
group. Prospective memory performance imposed a cost to Episodic Memory
(ongoing task) performance in the intellectual disability group. This group was
outperformed by the control group on working memory, time reproduction, time
concepts, and Raven’s coloured progressive matrices. To conclude, pictures at
retrieval improve prospective memory performance compared to words as cues.
This can be essential for the intellectual disability group likely due to limited
episodic and working memory capacity and the ability to switch attention.
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Genetic testing for intellectual disability, global developmental delay and other neurodevelopmental disorders has advanced considerably in the last five to ten years and can be an important diagnostic tool for clinicians. This article provides a clinical and ethical framework for understanding these advances, future directions and the current limitations of these approaches. Ann Neurol 2013;74:164–170
Annals of Neurology 06/2013; 74(2). DOI:10.1002/ana.23950 · 9.98 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.