Article

Measurement of Osteogenic Exercise – How to Interpret Accelerometric Data?

Department of Medical Technology, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Oulu Oulu, Finland.
Frontiers in Physiology (Impact Factor: 3.5). 10/2011; 2:73. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2011.00073
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Bone tissue adapts to its mechanical loading environment. We review here the accelerometric measurements with special emphasis on osteogenic exercise. The accelerometric method offers a unique opportunity to assess the intensity of mechanical loadings. We present methods to interpret accelerometric data, reducing it to the daily distributions of magnitude, slope, area, and energy of signal. These features represent the intensity level of physical activities, and were associated with the changes in bone density, bone geometry, physical performance, and metabolism in healthy premenopausal women. Bone adaptations presented a dose- and intensity dependent relationship with impact loading. Changes in hip were threshold dependent, indicating the importance of high-impacts exceeding acceleration of 4 g or slope of 100 g/s as an osteogenic stimulus. The number of impacts needed was 60/day. We also present the daily impact score to describe the osteogenic potential of daily mechanical loading with a single score. The methodology presented here can be used to study musculoskeletal adaptation to exercise in other target groups as well.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Timo Jämsä, Aug 30, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
108 Views
  • Source
    • "However, newer accelerometers directly provide acceleration gravitational units (m/s 2 ), which may provide a relevant index of mechanical intensity. An additional accelerometer parameter, jerk or change in acceleration (g/s), has recently been shown to improve the prediction of physical activity dose as related to bone outcomes (Jämsä et al., 2011). Because bone can adapt to short bouts of mechanical loading if the load is of high intensity (Turner et al., 1994), the time-stamped feature of accelerometers is important. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Evidence strongly supports a positive, causal effect of physical activity on bone strength and suggests long-term benefits of childhood physical activity to the prevention of osteoporosis. The contribution of healthy bone development in youth is likely to be as important to fracture prevention as the amount of late adulthood bone loss. Families, schools (particularly physical education), and communities are key settings for health promotion focused on bone-enhancing physical activity. However, little research has explored the topic of health promotion and physical education as they pertain to bone health, so best practices are not known. Based on our understanding of the literature, we present the top 10 research questions in health promotion and physical education that should be answered to advance bone-enhancing physical activity in children and adolescents.
    Research quarterly for exercise and sport 03/2015; 86(1):5-12. DOI:10.1080/02701367.2014.995019 · 1.26 Impact Factor
  • Source
    FTR - Turkiye Fiziksel Tip ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 01/2013; 59(3). DOI:10.4274/tftr.93546 · 0.08 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: While it is widely acknowledged that bones adapt to the site-specific prevalent loading environment, reasonable ways to estimate skeletal loads are not necessarily available. For long bone shafts, muscles acting to bend the bone may provide a more appropriate surrogate of the loading than muscles expected to cause compressive loads. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate whether mid-thigh muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) was a better predictor of tibial mid-shaft bone strength than mid-tibia muscle CSA in middle aged and older men. 181 Caucasian men aged 50-79 years (mean±SD; 61±7 years) participated in this study. Mid-femoral and mid-tibial bone traits cortical area, density weighted polar moment of area and muscle CSA [cm(2)] were assessed with computed tomography. Tibial bone traits were positively associated with both the mid-femur (r=0.44 to 0.46, P<0.001) and the mid-tibia muscle CSA (r=0.35 to 0.37, P<0.001). Multivariate regression analysis, adjusting for age, weight, physical activity and femoral length, indicated that mid-femur muscle CSA predicted tibial mid-shaft bone strength indices better than mid-tibia muscle CSA. In conclusion, the association between a given skeletal site and functionally adjacent muscles may provide a meaningful probe of the site-specific effect of loading on bone.
    Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions 09/2013; 13(3):235-44. · 2.40 Impact Factor