A review of telephone coaching services for people with long-term conditions

Sheffield Hallam University, UK.
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (Impact Factor: 1.74). 12/2011; 17(8):451-8. DOI: 10.1258/jtt.2011.110513
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In one-to-one telephone coaching, the patient receives regular telephone calls from a health professional. We have reviewed the evidence for one-to-one telephone coaching. Following a literature search we retrieved 41 articles which reported on the development and the efficacy of 34 separate telephone coaching interventions for LTC management. Telephone coaching for LTC management has only occurred in the last ten years, is becoming increasingly prevalent, and is dominated by interventions in North America and Europe. Twenty-seven (79%) of the studies reported on randomised designs involving at least one control or comparison group/condition. Of the 34 interventions reviewed, 17 (50%) were aimed at diabetes management and 17 (50%) were designed to manage chronic cardiovascular conditions. Most studies (32 or 94%) reported outcomes in favour of the telephone coaching intervention, although few (15%) employed any form of cost-benefit analysis (CBA). In order to obtain a better impression of overall service efficacy, more clearly defined service outcomes are required in future.


Available from: Andrew Hutchison, Jun 17, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The productivity of the clinical psychologist has received inadequate attention and, more importantly, has not significantly improved over the past century. We define productivity, discuss potential benefits to consumers (e.g., potentially driving price down, increasing access), and ways productivity benefits those associated with the delivery of psychotherapy. We briefly describe precedents of productivity increases from other economic sectors that can serve as exemplars. We then describe 14 major ways that psychotherapists may improve their productivity. We believe that productivity increases should be a parameter that should receive increased attention and become associated with increased innovation.
    Professional Psychology Research and Practice 10/2014; 45(5). DOI:10.1037/a0037741 · 1.34 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Multiple studies reveal that the healthcare needs of chronically ill older adults are poorly managed and often have devastating consequences. This paper examines available evidence related to improving care management and outcomes in this vulnerable patient group. Findings reinforce the need for enhanced patient engagement and suggest comparative effectiveness research as an important and immediate path to optimize patient-clinician partnerships. An ongoing study in care management is described as an example of such comparative effectiveness research. An overview of the barriers to implementation of evidence-based strategies related to health literacy, shared decision-making and accountability for self-management is provided, followed by a set of recommendations designed to facilitate comparative effectiveness research that advances engagement of high-risk older adults and their family caregivers.
    09/2013; 2(5):457-68. DOI:10.2217/cer.13.58
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite the efforts of the healthcare community to improve the quality of diabetes care, about 50% of people with type 2 diabetes do not reach their treatment targets, increasing the risk of future micro-and macro-vascular complications. Diabetes self-management education has been shown to contribute to better disease control. However, it is not known which strategies involving educational programs are cost-effective. Telehealth applications might support chronic disease management. Transferability of successful distant patient self-management support programs to the Belgian setting needs to be confirmed by studies of a high methodological quality. "The COACH Program" was developed in Australia as target driven educational telephone delivered intervention to support people with different chronic conditions. It proved to be effective in patients with coronary heart disease after hospitalization. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of The COACH Program in people with type 2 diabetes needs to be assessed. Randomized controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients were selected based on their medication consumption data and were recruited by their sickness fund. They were randomized to receive either usual care plus "The COACH Program" or usual care alone. The study will assess the difference in outcomes between groups. The primary outcome measure is the level of HbA1c. The secondary outcomes are: Total Cholesterol, LDL-Cholesterol, HDL-Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Blood Pressure, body mass index, smoking status; proportion of people at target for HbA1c, LDL-Cholesterol and Blood Pressure; self-perceived health status, diabetes-specific emotional distress and satisfaction with diabetes care. The follow-up period is 18 months. Within-trial and modeled cost-utility analyses, to project effects over life-time horizon beyond the trial duration, will be undertaken from the perspective of the health care system if the intervention is effective. The study will enhance our understanding of the potential of telehealth in diabetes management in Belgium. Research on the clinical effectiveness and the cost-effectiveness is essential to support policy makers in future reimbursement and implementation decisions.Trial registration: Belgian number: B322201213625. Identifier: NCT01612520.
    BMC Family Practice 02/2014; 15(1):24. DOI:10.1186/1471-2296-15-24 · 1.74 Impact Factor