Simulation in Obstetric Anesthesia

Department of Anesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Anesthesia and analgesia (Impact Factor: 3.47). 01/2012; 114(1):186-90. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182377bbc
Source: PubMed


Simulation can be used to teach technical skills, to evaluate clinician performance, to help assess the safety of the environment of care, and to improve teamwork. Each of these has been successfully demonstrated in obstetric anesthesia simulation. Task simulators for epidural placement, failed intubation, and blood loss estimation seem to improve performance. Resident performance in an emergency cesarean delivery can be measured and assessed against his/her peers. Running simulated crises on a labor and delivery unit (in situ drills) can help to identify and correct potential safety concerns (latent errors) without exposing patients to the risks associated with these concerns. Finally, simulation can effectively assess and teach teamwork tools and behaviors. It is unclear, however, how well the lessons learned in the simulated environment translate into improved behaviors or better care in the clinical setting, or whether simulation improves patient outcomes. More research is needed to help answer these questions.

1 Follower
38 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Undergraduate medical education is currently being reformed to adapt to our evolving systems of health care. Medical student curricula are focussing less on mastery of knowledge and clinical skills and more on achieving multiple competencies that will provide students with a solid foundation to practice in complex health-care environments. Anaesthesiologists are uniquely positioned to teach towards a number of competencies. In order to do so, innovations in the traditional apprentice-style clerkships need to be considered. Anaesthesiology rotations should be made part of the core curriculum in order to meet evolving student educational needs and better position anaesthesia educators to assist future curriculum reform. Innovative approaches applicable to anaesthesia clerkships include the use of integration techniques, continuity of patient care and educator preceptorship, as well as multidisciplinary and interprofessional teaching. Continued inquiry into teaching effectiveness and curricular innovation is critical in order to meet the educational needs of future medical students.
    03/2012; 26(1):23-32. DOI:10.1016/j.bpa.2012.03.001
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The use of simulation in medicine has grown significantly over the past 2 decades. Simulation in obstetric anesthesia can be divided into four broad uses: technical skills, nontechnical or teamwork skills, individual clinical competence, and the safety of the clinical environment. This review will describe recent trends in the use of simulation in several of these categories. Simulation continues to be an important part of skills (technical and cognitive) and teamwork training in obstetric anesthesia. The acquisition of simple and complex technical skills appears to be improved with the use of simulation. However, the assessment of these skills is currently done in the simulated environment. Simulation is also important in assessing and enhancing the safety of a labor unit. Two simulation trends have recently evolved. Instructional articles describing how to best perform simulation have begun to appear. In addition, several review articles have been published that demonstrate the maturation of the body of research in this field. As the use of simulation continues to grow, research should concentrate on whether anesthesia or teamwork skills learned in the simulated environment change behavior and improve outcomes in the clinical setting. More instructional publications would also facilitate the growth into more clinical environments.
    Current opinion in anaesthesiology 04/2012; 25(3):271-6. DOI:10.1097/ACO.0b013e3283531fdf · 1.98 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Cardiac arrest in the parturient is often fatal, but appropriate resuscitation in this special situation may save the lives of the mother and/or unborn baby. Concern has arisen as to application of recommended techniques for resuscitation in the obstetric patient. The Israel Board of Anesthesiology has incorporated simulation assessment into accreditation examinations. The candidates represent a unique national cohort in which we were able to assess competence in the simulated scenario of cardiorespiratory arrest in the parturient. METHODS A simulated scenario of preeclampsia with magnesium toxicity leading to cardiac arrest in a pregnant patient was performed by 25 senior anesthesiology residents. A unique two-stage simulation examination consisting of high fidelity simulation followed immediately by oral debriefing was conducted. The assessment was scored using a predetermined checklist of key actions and answers to clarifying questions. Simulation performance was compared to debriefing performance. RESULTS During the board examination, resuscitation not specific to the pregnant patient was performed well (commencing chest compressions, bag-mask ventilation, cardiac defibrillation); however actions specific to the parturient were performed poorly. Left uterine displacement, cricoid pressure during bag-mask ventilation, and instructing preparations to be made for perimortem cesarean delivery within 5 minutes were performed by 68%, 48%, and 40% of candidates respectively (lower 99% confidence limit 42%, 25%, and 19%, respectively). Cricoid pressure during bag-mask ventilation was performed by 48% (25%) but described in debriefing by 80% of candidates (53%) (P = 0.08), and time setting for perimortem cesarean delivery was performed by 40% (29%) but described by 80% (53%) (P = 0.05) of examinees. CONCLUSIONS Senior anesthesiology residents have poor knowledge of resuscitation of the pregnant patient. The results suggest 2-stage simulation including an oral component may reveal disparities in knowledge not assessed by simulation alone, but definitive conclusions require further study.
    Anesthesia and analgesia 08/2012; 115(5):1122-6. DOI:10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182691977 · 3.47 Impact Factor
Show more

Similar Publications