Practice Effects Predict Cognitive Outcome in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment

Department of Neurology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, 84108, USA.
The American journal of geriatric psychiatry: official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 3.52). 11/2011; 19(11):932-9. DOI: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e318209dd3a
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Practice effects on cognitive tests have been shown to further characterize patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and may provide predictive information about cognitive change across time. We tested the hypothesis that a loss of practice effects would portend a worse prognosis in aMCI.
Longitudinal, observational design following participants across 1 year.
Community-based cohort.
Three groups of older adults: 1) cognitively intact (n = 57), 2) aMCI with large practice effects across 1 week (MCI + PE, n = 25), and 3) aMCI with minimal practice effects across 1 week (MCI - PE, n = 26).
Neuropsychological tests.
After controlling for age and baseline cognitive differences, the MCI - PE group performed significantly worse than the other groups after 1 year on measures of immediate memory, delayed memory, language, and overall cognition.
Although these results need to be replicated in larger samples, the loss of short-term practice effects portends a worse prognosis in patients with aMCI.

Download full-text


Available from: Gordon Chelune, Jun 29, 2015
1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study compared performance in two groups of older adults, one healthy and another with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), in order to determine whether or not they exhibit plasticity and to analyze whether or not plastic and non-plastic participants differed after a delay. To measure cognitive plasticity, the Spain-Complutense Verbal Learning Test (TAVEC) was applied to a total of 113 participants over 65 who were divided into two groups: MCI (N = 51) and control (N = 62). It was concluded that healthy participants performed better, but impaired participants also demonstrated some capacity for learning and plasticity, and it was shown that these improvements were maintained after a delay. Therefore, TAVEC seems a fitting, simple procedure with which to measure cognitive plasticity, and an effective indicator of impairment.
    Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 08/2013; DOI:10.1093/arclin/act064 · 1.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Practice effects are improvements in cognitive test performance associated with repeated administrations of same or similar measures and are traditionally seen as error variance. However, there is growing evidence that practice effects provide clinically useful information. Within-session practice effects (WISPE) across 2 h were collected from 61 non-consecutive patients referred for suspected dementia and compared to the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE), a screening measure of dementia severity. In all patients, WISPE on two cognitive measures were significantly correlated with MMSE, even after controlling for baseline cognitive scores (partial r = 0.47, p < 0.001; partial r = 0.26, p = 0.046). In patients diagnosed with probable Alzheimer's disease, the trend was even stronger (partial r = 0.72, p < 0.01; partial r = 0.58, p = 0.046). In both groups, lower WISPE were associated with lower MMSE scores (i.e. greater dementia severity), even after controlling for initial cognitive scores. If future research validates these findings with longitudinal studies, then WISPE may have important clinical applications in dementia evaluations.
    Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders 01/2012; 33(4):245-9. DOI:10.1159/000339268 · 2.81 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In neuropsychological assessment, and many areas of research, it is common for the same test to be administered on more than one occasion to measure change. Measured changes are presumed to reflect true changes in the construct being measured by the test; for example, cognitive changes due to processes such as aging, advancing neurological disease, or treatment interventions. However, practice effects, defined as score increases due to factors such as memory for specific test items, learned strategies, or test sophistication, complicate the interpretation of change. This review presents meta-analyses of nearly 1600 individual effect sizes representing changes in mean-level performance on tests commonly used to assess core domains of neuropsychological function, with the goal of quantitatively summarizing the magnitude of practice effects on such tests. The use of alternate forms, the ages of participants, clinical diagnoses of study participants, and length of the test-retest interval were associated with the magnitude of change in many cases. These findings have important implications for the practice of clinical neuropsychology, as well as for research applications, and highlight the need for practice effects to be taken into account in interpreting change across time with multiple measurements.
    The Clinical Neuropsychologist 04/2012; 26(4):543-70. DOI:10.1080/13854046.2012.680913 · 1.58 Impact Factor