Differences in multijoint radiographic osteoarthritis phenotypes among African Americans and Caucasians: The Johnston County Osteoarthritis project

Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Arthritis & Rheumatology (Impact Factor: 7.48). 12/2011; 63(12):3843-52. DOI: 10.1002/art.30610
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To define and contrast multiple joint radiographic osteoarthritis (OA) phenotypes describing hand and whole-body radiographic OA among African Americans and Caucasians.
We conducted a cross-sectional analysis in the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project, using radiographic data for the hands, tibiofemoral (TF) joints, patellofemoral joints, hips, and lumbosacral (LS) spine. Radiographs were read for OA by a single radiologist using standard atlases. Fisher's exact test, with correction for multiple comparisons, was used to compare phenotype frequencies by race and sex. Logistic regression was used to provide odds ratios, which were adjusted for sex, age, and body mass index (BMI).
Sixteen mutually exclusive hand (n = 2,083) and 32 whole-body (n = 1,419) radiographic OA phenotypes were identified. We found that in comparison to Caucasians, African Americans had significantly less frequent radiographic OA of the distal interphalangeal joints, both in isolation and in combination with other hand joint sites, but had comparable frequencies of radiographic OA for other hand joint sites. Moreover, African Americans had less frequent radiographic OA of the hand, both in isolation and in combination with other joint sites, as compared to Caucasians. In contrast, African Americans had more than twice the odds of isolated OA of the TF joint and 77% higher odds of radiographic OA of the TF joint and LS spine together as compared to Caucasians.
Even after adjustment for sex, age, and BMI, African Americans were less likely than Caucasians to have hand radiographic OA phenotypes, but more likely to have knee radiographic OA phenotypes involving the TF joint. African Americans may have a higher burden of multiple large-joint OA involvement not captured by most definitions of "generalized OA."

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Associations of socioeconomic status (SES) with the prevalence of various forms of arthritis are well documented. Increasing evidence suggests that SES during childhood is a lasting determinant of health, but its association with the onset of arthritis remains unclear. Cross-sectional data on 1276 participants originated from 22 family practices in North-Carolina, USA. We created 4-level (high, medium, low, lowest) current SES and childhood SES summary scores based on parental and participant education, occupation and homeownership. We investigated associations of individual SES characteristics, summary scores and SES trajectories (e.g. high/low) with self-reported arthritis in logistic regression models progressively adjusted for race and gender, age, then BMI, and clustered by family practice. We found evidence for independent associations of both childhood and current SES with the reporting of arthritis across our models. In covariate-adjusted models simultaneously including current and childhood SES, compared with high SES participants in the lowest childhood SES category (OR = 1.39 [95%CI = 1.04, 1.85]) and those in the low (OR = 1.66 [95%CI = 1.14, 2.42]) and lowest (OR = 2.08 [95%CI = 1.16, 3.74]) categories of current SES had significantly greater odds of having self-reported arthritis. Current SES and childhood SES are both associated with the odds of reporting arthritis within this primary-care population, although the possibly superseding influence of existing circumstances must be noted. BMI was a likely mechanism in the association of childhood SES with arthritis onset, and research is needed to elucidate further pathways linking the socioeconomic environment across life-stages and the development of rheumatic diseases.
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 11/2013; 14(1):327. DOI:10.1186/1471-2474-14-327 · 1.90 Impact Factor
    This article is viewable in ResearchGate's enriched format
  • Arthritis & Rheumatology 11/2013; 65(11). DOI:10.1002/art.38086 · 7.87 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Given the conflicting definitions of "generalized osteoarthritis" (GOA) in the literature, we performed a systematic review of GOA definitions, risk factors, and outcomes. We searched the MEDLINE literature with the terms osteoarthritis, generalized, polyarticular, multiple joint, and multi-joint to obtain articles related to GOA, following evidence-based guidelines. Titles and abstracts of 948 articles were reviewed, with full-text review of 108. Data were extracted based on pre-specified criteria for 74 articles plus 24 identified through bibliographic review (n = 98). Twenty-four large cohorts (n ~ 30,000) were represented along with numerous clinical series (n ~ 9000), across 22 countries and 60 years (1952-2012). No less than 15 definitions of GOA were given in 30 studies with a stated GOA definition; at least 6 groups used a summed score of joints or radiographic grades. Prevalence estimates based on these GOA definitions were 1-80%, although most were 5-25%. Increased risk and progression of GOA was associated with age, female sex, and genetic/familial factors. Associations with increased body mass index or bone mineral density were not consistent. A study estimated the heritability of GOA at 42%. Collagen biomarker levels increased with the number of involved joints. Increased OA burden was associated with increased mortality and disability, poorer health, and function. While there remains no standard definition of GOA, this term is commonly used. The impact on health may be greater when OA is in more than one joint. A descriptive term, such as multi-joint or polyarticular OA, designating OA of multiple joints or joint groups is recommended.
    Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism 12/2013; DOI:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2013.12.007 · 4.72 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jan 8, 2015