Differences in multijoint radiographic osteoarthritis phenotypes among African Americans and Caucasians: The Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project

Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Arthritis & Rheumatology (Impact Factor: 7.76). 12/2011; 63(12):3843-52. DOI: 10.1002/art.30610
Source: PubMed


To define and contrast multiple joint radiographic osteoarthritis (OA) phenotypes describing hand and whole-body radiographic OA among African Americans and Caucasians.
We conducted a cross-sectional analysis in the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project, using radiographic data for the hands, tibiofemoral (TF) joints, patellofemoral joints, hips, and lumbosacral (LS) spine. Radiographs were read for OA by a single radiologist using standard atlases. Fisher's exact test, with correction for multiple comparisons, was used to compare phenotype frequencies by race and sex. Logistic regression was used to provide odds ratios, which were adjusted for sex, age, and body mass index (BMI).
Sixteen mutually exclusive hand (n = 2,083) and 32 whole-body (n = 1,419) radiographic OA phenotypes were identified. We found that in comparison to Caucasians, African Americans had significantly less frequent radiographic OA of the distal interphalangeal joints, both in isolation and in combination with other hand joint sites, but had comparable frequencies of radiographic OA for other hand joint sites. Moreover, African Americans had less frequent radiographic OA of the hand, both in isolation and in combination with other joint sites, as compared to Caucasians. In contrast, African Americans had more than twice the odds of isolated OA of the TF joint and 77% higher odds of radiographic OA of the TF joint and LS spine together as compared to Caucasians.
Even after adjustment for sex, age, and BMI, African Americans were less likely than Caucasians to have hand radiographic OA phenotypes, but more likely to have knee radiographic OA phenotypes involving the TF joint. African Americans may have a higher burden of multiple large-joint OA involvement not captured by most definitions of "generalized OA."

Download full-text


Available from: Todd Schwartz, Jan 08, 2015
  • Source
    • "It is interesting that being non-Hispanic Black is associated with lower odds for self-reported OA, although the reason is unclear. In fact, ethnic differences in the phenotypes of OA has recently been reported, in that African Americans were less likely to have hand OA, but more likely to have knee OA than Caucasians [25]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: Arthritis is associated with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). However, there are limited epidemiologic studies on arthritis in a national survey study. We therefore investigated the prevalence of self-reported arthritis and its association with CVDs. Methods: Data from 15,888 subjects aged 40 years or older in the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999 through 2008 were analyzed. CVD was defined as a self-reported history of heart attack, congestive heart failure, coronary heart disease, angina, or stroke. Results: The overall prevalence of self-reported arthritis in subjects aged 40 years or older increased from 33.5% in 1999 through 2000 to 37.0% in 2007 through 2008 (P for trend = 0.017). Among subjects with arthritis in 1999 through 2008, 35.3% had osteoarthritis (OA), 17.9% had rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and 10.2% had other types of arthritis, but 36.6% were unaware of their type of arthritis. Compared with subjects without OA, subjects with OA had higher odds for CVDs (odds ratio [OR], 1.53; P < .001), especially angina (OR, 2.18: P < .001). Compared with subjects without RA, subjects with RA had higher odds for CVDs (adjusted OR, 2.39; P < .001), especially congestive heart failure (OR, 3.59; P < .001). Conclusions: Both RA and OA are strongly associated with CVDs in the general population. Further studies are needed to investigate their causal relationship.
    Annals of epidemiology 12/2012; 23(2). DOI:10.1016/j.annepidem.2012.11.008 · 2.00 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the prevalence of lumbar spine individual radiographic features (IRFs) of disc space narrowing (DSN), osteophytes (OST), and facet joint osteoarthritis (FOA); to describe the frequencies of demographic, clinical, and radiographic knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis (OA) across lumbar spine IRFs; and to determine factors associated with lumbar spine IRFs. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 840 participants enrolled in the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project (2003-2004). Sample-based prevalence estimates were generated for each lumbar spine IRF. The associations between lumbar spine IRFs and demographic, clinical, and peripheral joint OA were determined with logistic regression models. Sample-based prevalence estimates were similar for DSN (57.6%) and FOA (57.9%) but higher for OST (88.1%), with significant differences across race and sex. Hand and knee OA frequencies increased across IRFs, whereas the effect was absent for hip OA. African Americans had lower odds of FOA (adjusted odds ratio [OR(adj) ] 0.45 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.32-0.62]), while there was no racial association with DSN and OST. Low back symptoms were associated with DSN (OR(adj) 1.37 [95% CI 1.04-1.80]) but not OST or FOA. Knee OA was associated with OST (OR(adj) 1.62 [95% CI 1.16-2.27]) and FOA (OR(adj) 1.69 [95% CI 1.15-2.49]) but not DSN. Hand OA was associated with FOA (OR(adj) 1.67 [95% CI 1.20-2.28]) but not with DSN or OST. No associations were found with hip OA. These findings underscore the importance of analyzing lumbar spine IRFs separately as the associations with demographic, clinical, and radiographic knee, hip, and hand OA differ widely.
    10/2012; 64(10):1536-44. DOI:10.1002/acr.21720
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This 6-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study compared the analgesic efficacy, tolerability and safety of celecoxib, naproxen and placebo in African Americans with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. A total of 322 patients aged ≥ 45 years with OA of the knee in a flare state received 200 mg celecoxib orally once daily, 500 mg naproxen orally twice daily or placebo for 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in the Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain. Celecoxib was as effective as naproxen in reducing OA pain. Similar efficacy was observed in many of the secondary outcome measures. Celecoxib was well tolerated and demonstrated favorable upper gastro-intestinal tolerability. Improvements in outcome measures were numerically greater in the active treatment groups compared with the placebo group, but did not reach statistical significance. Celecoxib was as effective as naproxen in relieving OA pain in African Americans and was well tolerated. Few significant differences were observed between active treatments and placebo, possibly because of a strong placebo effect.
    The Journal of international medical research 12/2012; 40(6):2251-66. DOI:10.1177/030006051204000623 · 1.44 Impact Factor
Show more