Oxygen Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction-Then and Now. A Century of Uncertainty

Cardiometabolic Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA.
The American journal of medicine (Impact Factor: 5). 11/2011; 124(11):1000-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.04.034
Source: PubMed


For about 100 years, inhaled oxygen has been administered to all patients suspected of having an acute myocardial infarction. The basis for this practice was the belief that oxygen supplementation raised often-deficient arterial oxygen content to improve myocardial oxygenation, thereby reducing infarct size. This assumption is conditional and not evidence-based. While such physiological changes may pertain in some patients who are hypoxemic, considerable data suggest that oxygen therapy may be detrimental in others. Acute oxygen therapy may raise blood pressure and lower cardiac index, heart rate, cardiac oxygen consumption, and blood flow in the cerebral and renal beds. Oxygen also may lower capillary density and redistribute blood in the microcirculation. Several reports now confirm that these changes occur in humans. In patients with both acute coronary syndromes and stable coronary disease, oxygen administration may constrict the coronary vessels, lower myocardial oxygen delivery, and may actually worsen ischemia. There are no large, contemporary, randomized studies that examine clinical outcomes after this intervention. Hence, this long-accepted but potentially harmful tradition urgently needs reevaluation. Clinical guidelines appear to be changing, favoring use of oxygen only in hypoxemic patients, and then cautiously titrating to individual oxygen tensions.

Download full-text


Available from: Richard Kones,
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Strategies to support oxygenation can cause substantial harm through lung stretch injury, oxygen toxicity, transfusion risks and cardiac over-stimulation. Traditional goals of maintaining near normal cardiorespiratory parameters are most likely overly simplistic and are insensitive and nonspecific for tissue hypoxic effects. In order to reduce iatrogenic harm, it is conceivable that clinicians could be comfortable with lower levels of arterial oxygen content (eg, oxyhemoglobin values of < 88%: so called "permissive hypoxemia"), provided that there are ways to effectively monitor tissue hypoxia. We can learn more about hypoxic compensatory mechanisms from the fetus and from high altitude residents. We also need to learn better ways of monitoring tissue oxygenation, especially in "mission critical" tissues. Ultimately clinical trials will be needed to determine appropriate oxygenation targets to allow permissive hypoxemia.
    Respiratory care 01/2013; 58(1):142-50. DOI:10.4187/respcare.02087 · 1.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Oxygen supplementation is a standard treatment for all patients who present with acute coronary syndrome, regardless of oxygen saturation levels. Most of the data regarding the function of oxygen in myocardial infarction is based on a limited number of basic and clinical studies. We performed a systematic literature review that explores the basic and clinical data on the function of oxygen in ischaemic heart disease and myocardial infarction. This review discusses many aspects of oxygen treatment: (i) basic studies on the effects of oxygen in ischaemia and the potential cardiovascular effects of oxygen metabolites; (ii) clinical trials that have assessed the value of inhaled oxygen, supersaturated oxygen, and intracoronary injection of hyperoxaemic solutions in myocardial infarction; and (iii) the haemodynamic effects of oxygen in various clinical scenarios and its direct effects on the coronary vasculature. Our findings suggest that there are conflicting data on the effects of oxygen treatment. Further, the potential harmful effects of oxygen must be considered, particularly in myocardial infarction. These findings question the current guidelines and recommendations and emphasize the need for large clinical trials.
    European Heart Journal 04/2013; 34(22). DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/eht110 · 15.20 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Oxygen in arguably one of the most frequently utilized drugs in modern healthcare, but is often administered to patients at caregivers' discretion with scant evidence as to its efficacy or safety. Although oxygen is administered for varied medical conditions in the hospital setting, published literature supports the use of oxygen to reverse hypoxemia, for trauma victims with traumatic brain injury and hemorrhagic shock, for resuscitation during cardiac arrest, and for carbon monoxide poisoning. Oxygen should be titrated to target an SpO2 of 94-98%, except with carbon monoxide poisoning (100% oxygen), ARDS (88-95%), those at risk for hypercapnia (SpO2 88-92%), and premature infants (SpO2 88-94%). Evidence for use with other conditions for which oxygen is administered relies on anecdotal experiences, case reports, or small, underpowered studies. Definitive conclusions for oxygen use in these conditions where efficacy and/or safety are uncertain will require large randomized controlled clinical trials.
    10/2013; 58(10):1679-93. DOI:10.4187/respcare.02677
Show more