Systematic review of wireless phone use and brain cancer and other head tumors

Department of Information Engineering, Electronics and Telecommunications, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
Bioelectromagnetics (Impact Factor: 1.86). 04/2012; 33(3):187-206. DOI: 10.1002/bem.20716
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We conducted a systematic review of scientific studies to evaluate whether the use of wireless phones is linked to an increased incidence of the brain cancer glioma or other tumors of the head (meningioma, acoustic neuroma, and parotid gland), originating in the areas of the head that most absorb radiofrequency (RF) energy from wireless phones. Epidemiology and in vivo studies were evaluated according to an agreed protocol; quality criteria were used to evaluate the studies for narrative synthesis but not for meta-analyses or pooling of results. The epidemiology study results were heterogeneous, with sparse data on long-term use (≥ 10 years). Meta-analyses of the epidemiology studies showed no statistically significant increase in risk (defined as P < 0.05) for adult brain cancer or other head tumors from wireless phone use. Analyses of the in vivo oncogenicity, tumor promotion, and genotoxicity studies also showed no statistically significant relationship between exposure to RF fields and genotoxic damage to brain cells, or the incidence of brain cancers or other tumors of the head. Assessment of the review results using the Hill criteria did not support a causal relationship between wireless phone use and the incidence of adult cancers in the areas of the head that most absorb RF energy from the use of wireless phones. There are insufficient data to make any determinations about longer-term use (≥ 10 years).

Download full-text


Available from: Alexander Lerchl, Jul 29, 2015
  • Source
    • "The huge diffusion of communication technologies based on radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic (EM) fields, such as mobile communications (GSM, UMTS) and wireless data transfer (Wi-Fi, Wi-Max, Bluetooth, ZigBee, etc.), and their massive use in crowded environments, where people last for long time periods, as schools, hospitals, offices, and transportation means, have led to concern on possible health effects of this kind of low-level multiple exposure. As a consequence, a lot of in vitro, in vivo, and epidemiological studies have been carried out, often leading to conflicting results, as evident from literature reviews [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previous studies identified the train compartment as the place where people can experience the highest exposure levels (still below the international guideline limits) to electromagnetic fields in the radiofrequency range. Here a possible scenario of a train compartment has been reproduced and characterized, both numerically and experimentally. A good agreement between the simulated electric field distributions and measurements has been found. Results indicate that the higher values of exposure in specific positions inside the train compartment depend on the number of active cell phones, the bad coverage condition, the cell orientation, and the presence of metallic walls. This study shows that the proposed approach, based on the scenarios characterization, may efficiently support the assessment of the individual electromagnetic exposure.
    BioMed Research International 01/2015; 2015:869895. DOI:10.1155/2015/869895 · 2.71 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The story was picked up in evening newscasts as well as print and digital outlets (CNN Health 2012). Evidence on cancer incidences associated with cell phone use has generally been debunked (Moulder et al. 1999; Repacholi et al. 2012). Nonetheless, there remain isolated studies suggesting a complicated and unsettling relationship (Dhawan and Handa 2012; Lin 2012). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Over the last five decades, social science researchers have examined how the public perceives the risks associated with a variety of environmental health and safety (EHS) hazards. The body of literature that has been emerged diverse both in the methodology employed to collect and analyze data and in the subject of study. The findings have confirmed that risk perceptions vary between groups of individuals as well as between categories of EHS risks. However, the extant literature on EHS risk perceptions has failed to provide empirical insights into how risk perceptions can be best explained according to the interplay of both (1) the category of EHS hazard appraised and (2) the prominent individual-level characteristics that best explain observed risk perception differences. This study addresses this deficiency in the literature by providing insights into the individual and cumulative roles that various individual-level variables play in characterizing risk perceptions to various categories of EHS risks including ‘agentic risks’ like street drug use and cigarette smoking, ‘emerging technological risks’ like nanoparticles and cloning, and ‘manufacturing risks’ like air and chemical pollution. Our data are drawn from the 2009 Citizens, Science, and Emerging Technologies national study of United States households that investigated public perceptions of EHS risks, traditional and emerging media use, and various individual characteristics like personal demographics, socioeconomic factors, and perceptual filters. The findings show that some categories of EHS risks like those associated with emerging technologies may be more easily predicted than other categories of risks and that individual-level characteristics vary in their explanative power between risk categories even among a single sample of respondents.
    Journal of Risk Research 11/2013; 16(10). DOI:10.1080/13669877.2013.788544 · 1.27 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The conclusion of the IARC was mainly based on the INTERPHONE epidemiological study, which found an increased risk for glioma in the highest category of heavy users (30 minutes per day over a 10 year period), although no increased risk was found at lower exposure. The evidence for other types of cancer was found to be "inadequate" [5]. In vivo and in vitro studies, carried out so far, have provided only limited support for the above mentioned classification [6], mainly due to the difficulty in comparing the results of the available studies to draw general conclusion. "
    Microwave materials characterization, Edited by S. Costanzo, 01/2012; InTech., ISBN: 978-953-51-0848-1
Show more