Prevalence of Uterine and Adnexal Involvement in Pulmonary Lymphangioleiomyomatosis: A Clinicopathologic Study of 10 Patients
ABSTRACT Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM), a systemic disorder affecting almost exclusively young women, is characterized by the abnormal proliferation of smooth muscle-like cells (LAM cells). LAM can occur either in association with the tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) (TSC-LAM) or without TSC (sporadic LAM). Recent studies have demonstrated that LAM is a neoplasm arising from constitutive activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathway dysregulated by a functional loss of TSC genes, but the primary organ of origin remains unclear. Therefore, we performed histologic and immunohistologic analyses of gynecologic organs in 20 patients, half with and the other half without pulmonary LAM, to determine how often LAM involves the uterus. The results showed that 9 of 10 (90%) patients with pulmonary LAM had uterine LAM lesions. In contrast, no patients without pulmonary LAM had so. All uterine LAM lesions were accompanied by LAM lesions in retroperitoneal or pelvic lymph nodes and LAM cell clusters, each enveloped by a monolayer of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3-positive lymphatic endothelial cells. Furthermore, when we compared uterine lesions of TSC-LAM with those of sporadic LAM, proliferation of HMB45-positive epithelioid-shaped LAM cells and infiltrates with a tongue-like growth pattern was more prominent in the former, whereas the extent of lymphangiogenesis within the myometrium was greater in the latter. These results indicate that uterine involvement is a common manifestation of LAM, and, possibly, that the uterus or an adjacent locale in the retroperitoneum or pelvic cavity is the primary site of origin of LAM.
- SourceAvailable from: Joungho Han
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
- "They introduced PEE cells as involvement of vascular wall of LAM cells. Out of the nine cases of uterine LAM, seven exhibited involvement of the vascular wall; however, intravascular involvement was not detected and endothelial cells were preserved in all cases.9 In our study, case 2 exhibited PEE cells with preserved endothelial cells and no intravascular involvement. "
ABSTRACT: Background Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is a slowly progressive neoplastic disease that predominantly affects females. Usually, LAM affects the lung; it can also affect extrapulmonary sites, such as the mediastinum, the retroperitoneum, or the lymph nodes, although these locations are rare. A localized form of LAM can manifest as extrapulmonary lesions; this form is referred to as extrapulmonary lymphangioleiomyoma (E-LAM). Due to the rare occurrence of E-LAM and its variable, atypical location, E-LAM is often difficult to diagnose. Herein, we report the clinicopathological information from four E-LAM cases, and also review previous articles investigating this disease. Methods Four patients with E-LAM were identified at the Samsung Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) from 1995 to 2012. All E-LAM lesions underwent surgical excision. Results All patients were females within the age range of 43 to 47 years. Two patients had para-aortic retroperitoneal masses, while the other two patients had pelvic lesions; two out of the four patients also had accompanying pulmonary LAM. In addition, no patient displayed any evidence of tuberous sclerosis. Histologically, two patients exhibited nuclear atypism with cytologic degeneration. Conclusions E-LAM should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with pelvic or para-aortic masses. We also conclude that further clinical and pathological evaluation is needed in patients with E-LAM and nuclear atypism.The Korean Journal of Pathology 06/2014; 48(3):188-92. DOI:10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2014.48.3.188 · 0.17 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A 41-year-old woman carrying a germline tuberous sclerosis complex 2 (TSC2) mutation, whose regular medical follow-up for tuberous sclerosis complex and tuberous sclerosis complex-associated lymphangioleiomyomatosis had continued for 2 years, had uterine angiosarcoma concomitant with uterine lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Immunohistochemically, the uterine angiosarcoma cells showed an extremely skewed lymphatic differentiation; they were diffusely immunopositive for CD31 but negative for other vascular endothelial markers including factor VIII and CD34 yet strongly immunopositive for lymphatic endothelial markers including D2-40 and Prox-1. Loss of heterozygosity analysis demonstrated that not only lymphangioleiomyomatosis and renal angiomyolipoma but also the uterine angiosarcoma had loss of heterozygosity on TSC2. Furthermore, direct sequencing revealed a TP53 mutation in the uterine angiosarcoma. Collectively, the findings suggest that combined dysfunction of the p53 and TSC2 tumor suppressor proteins may contribute to the development of uterine angiosarcoma in this rare clinical setting.Human pathology 06/2012; 43(10):1777-84. DOI:10.1016/j.humpath.2012.03.020 · 2.81 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is a rare progressive lung disease of women. LAM is caused by mutations in the tuberous sclerosis genes, resulting in activation of the mTOR complex 1 signaling network. Over the past 11 years, there has been remarkable progress in the understanding of LAM and rapid translation of this knowledge to an effective therapy. LAM pathogenic mechanisms mirror those of many forms of human cancer, including mutation, metabolic reprogramming, inappropriate growth and survival, metastasis via blood and lymphatic circulation, infiltration/invasion, sex steroid sensitivity, and local and remote tissue destruction. However, the smooth muscle cell that metastasizes, infiltrates, and destroys the lung in LAM arises from an unknown source and has an innocent histological appearance, with little evidence of proliferation. Thus, LAM is as an elegant, monogenic model of neoplasia, defying categorization as either benign or malignant.The Journal of clinical investigation 11/2012; 122(11):3807-16. DOI:10.1172/JCI58709 · 13.77 Impact Factor