Using the Gross Motor Function Classification System to describe patterns of motor severity in cerebral palsy

Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (Impact Factor: 3.51). 11/2011; 53(11):1007-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04044.x
Source: PubMed


The aim of this study was to describe the distribution of motor severity levels and temporal trends in an Australian population cohort and to review the distribution of Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels across cerebral palsy (CP) registries worldwide.
Data were extracted from the Victorian Cerebral Palsy Register for 3312 individuals (1852 males, 1460 females; mean age 21y 2mo [SD 9 y 6 mo]) with non-postneonatally acquired CP, born between 1970 and 2003. The proportions of each motor severity level were calculated and logistic regression analyses were used to assess trends over time. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken and GMFCS data were extracted based on previously devised criteria. The proportions were plotted and the degree of heterogeneity was assessed for each level.
Population data from Victoria suggested a proportional increase in mild motor impairment (GMFCS levels I/II) from 54% of all cases of CP in the 1970s to 61% in the 2000s. For nine CP registries worldwide, the mean proportions of each GMFCS level, from level I to V, were 34.2%, 25.6%, 11.5%, 13.7%, and 15.6% respectively. There was substantial heterogeneity between registries for all levels except level III.
Despite the usefulness and reported reliability of the GMFCS, substantial variability was found in the distribution of GMFCS levels between population registries, particularly between levels I and II, suggesting greater classification uncertainty between these levels. Further research would be useful to determine whether routine collection of extra clinical information may facilitate more reliable classification.

32 Reads
  • Source
    Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 11/2011; 53(11):973-4. DOI:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04125.x · 3.51 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: Children and young people with Cerebral Palsy have limited opportunities for participation and there has been limited research to explore this concept. Adapted dynamic cycling (ADC) is one activity that can enable them to participate in the community. The aim of this paper is to report the views and experiences of children and young people with CP and their families regarding their participation in ADC. Methods: This was part of a mixed methods study of which the qualitative findings are reported here. Iterative creative methods were developed which involved semi-structured interviews and diaries about the ADC experience. Results: The themes that emerged were the staff and the environment at the cycling hire project, the facilitators and barriers to ADC, the technical set up of the bike and the impact on the child and family in terms of developments over time, future aspirations, learning cycling skills, social participation and health benefits. Conclusions: The data showed that children's experiences of ADC were fun and enjoyable. This fun exercise should be incorporated into a physiotherapy programme as part of the child or young person with CP's rehabilitation. Policy makers and parents may find the information useful to increase the child's participation. [Box: see text].
    Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology 04/2012; 8(1). DOI:10.3109/17483107.2012.680942
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To describe the Neonatal Research Network's efforts to improve the certification process for the Follow-Up Study neurologic exam and to evaluate inter-rater agreement before and after two annual training workshops. Study design: The Neonatal Research Network Follow-Up Study is a multi-center observational study that has examined more than 11 500 infants from 1998-2010 and born ≤26 weeks gestational age at 18-22 months corrected age for neurodevelopmental outcome. The percentages of examiners who agreed with the Gold Standard examiner on 4 neurodevelopmental outcomes on the initial training video and a test video were calculated. Consistency among examiners was assessed with the first-order agreement coefficient statistic. Results: Improvements in agreement among examiners occurred between 2009 and 2010 and between initial training and test. Examiner agreement with the Gold Standard during the initial training was 83%-91% in 2009 and 89%-99% in 2010. Examiner agreement on the workshop test video increased from 2009-2010 with agreement reaching 100% for all four neurodevelopmental outcomes examined in 2010. First-order agreement coefficient values for the four neurodevelopmental outcomes on the training videos ranged from 0.64-0.82 in 2009 and 0.77-0.97 in 2010. Conclusions: We demonstrate the importance of annual certification and the benefits of evaluation and revision of certification protocols to achieve high levels of confidence in neurodevelopmental study outcomes for multi-center networks.
    The Journal of pediatrics 06/2012; 161(6). DOI:10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.05.048 · 3.79 Impact Factor
Show more