Bevacizumab in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: friend or foe?

UM/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Current Oncology Reports (Impact Factor: 2.87). 02/2012; 14(1):1-11. DOI: 10.1007/s11912-011-0202-z
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a major cause of death among women worldwide. Progress has been made in treating MBC with the advent of anti-estrogen therapies, potent cytotoxic agents, and monoclonal antibodies. Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody against circulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which was approved in 2008 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), for first-line treatment of HER-2 negative MBC in combination with paclitaxel. The FDA then reversed this decision in December 2010 by recommending removal of the MBC indication from bevacizumab, citing primarily safety concerns, and that these risks did not outweigh the ability of bevacizumab to significantly prolong progression-free survival. This decision was unexpected in the oncology community and remains controversial. This review looks at all available phase 3 data with bevacizumab in the MBC setting to determine whether the data support this decision by the FDA, and discusses the future of bevacizumab in breast cancer.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Histopathologic knowledge that extensive heterogeneity exists between and within tumors has been confirmed and deepened recently by molecular studies. However, the impact of tumor heterogeneity on prognosis and treatment remains as poorly understood as ever. Using a hybrid multiscale mathematical model of tumor growth in vascularized tissue, we investigated the selection pressures exerted by spatial and temporal variations in tumor microenvironment and the resulting phenotypic adaptations. A key component of this model is normal and tumor metabolism and its interaction with microenvironmental factors. The metabolic phenotype of tumor cells is plastic, and microenvironmental selection leads to increased tumor glycolysis and decreased pH. Once this phenotype emerges, the tumor dramatically changes its behavior due to acid-mediated invasion, an effect that depends on both variations in the tumor cell phenotypes and their spatial distribution within the tumor. In early stages of growth, tumors are stratified, with the most aggressive cells developing within the interior of the tumor. These cells then grow to the edge of the tumor and invade into the normal tissue using acidosis. Simulations suggest that diffusible cytotoxic treatments, such as chemotherapy, may increase the metabolic aggressiveness of a tumor due to drug-mediated selection. Chemotherapy removes the metabolic stratification of the tumor and allows more aggressive cells to grow toward blood vessels and normal tissue. Antiangiogenic therapy also selects for aggressive phenotypes due to degradation of the tumor microenvironment, ultimately resulting in a more invasive tumor. In contrast, pH buffer therapy slows down the development of aggressive tumors, but only if administered when the tumor is still stratified. Overall, findings from this model highlight the risks of cytotoxic and antiangiogenic treatments in the context of tumor heterogeneity resulting from a selection for more aggressive behaviors. Cancer Res; 75(8); 1567-79. ©2015 AACR. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.
    Cancer Research 04/2015; 75(8):1567-79. DOI:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-1428 · 9.28 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Breast cancer remains the leading cause of new cancer cases in women and is responsible for the most cancer-related deaths in women worldwide. The goals of breast cancer treatment are to maintain or improve quality of life, prolong survival, and increase disease-free progression. The majority of breast cancer cases are estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2)-negative, and current treatment guidelines recommend multiple lines of endocrine therapy followed by chemotherapy in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic disease. Resistance to current therapies adds to the need for new therapeutic options. Translational research and preclinical data have provided insight into the identification of emerging signaling pathways for novel drug targets, and the development of a growing number of biologic targeted agents is currently underway to identify novel treatments. An alternative approach to improve patient benefit is to boost the efficacy and safety of existing agents by modifying their delivery or pharmacokinetics (ie, adding albumin to paclitaxel) as well as identifying new combination therapies. One combination therapy of interest is the addition of the 130 nm albumin-bound formulation of paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) to currently approved therapies or targeted agents in development. This review focuses on a number of key agents that are being investigated for the treatment of HER-2-negative breast cancer and the utilization of these agents as combination therapy to achieve prolonged disease control.
    01/2015; 2(2):27-38. DOI:10.1016/j.nhtm.2014.11.059
  • Cancer Research 07/2011; 71(8 Supplement):53-53. DOI:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-53 · 9.28 Impact Factor


Available from
May 30, 2014