Video Medical Interpretation over 3G Cellular Networks: A Feasibility Study

Office of High Performance Computing and Communications, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland 20854, USA.
Telemedicine and e-Health (Impact Factor: 1.67). 12/2011; 17(10):809-13. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0084
Source: PubMed


To test the feasibility of using cell phone technology to provide video medical interpretation services at a distance.
Alternative cell phone services were researched and videoconferencing technologies were tried out to identify video products and telecommunication services needed to meet video medical interpretation requirements. The video and telecommunication technologies were tried out in a pharmacy setting and compared with use of the telephone.
Outcomes were similar to findings in previous research involving video medical interpretation with higher bandwidth and video quality. Patients appreciated the interpretation service no matter how it is provided, while health providers and interpreters preferred video.
It is possible to provide video medical interpretation services via cellular communication using lower bandwidth videoconferencing technology that provides sufficient quality, at least in pharmacy settings. However, a number of issues need to be addressed to ensure quality of service.

Download full-text


Available from: Craig Locatis,
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background In 2011 the Australian Government introduced Medicare item numbers for telehealth consultations. This is a rapidly expanding method of health care provision.AimsWe assessed the demographic and disease profile of refugee patients attending a new telehealth clinic, and calculated the patient travel avoided. We examined technical challenges and assessed the performance of two videoconferencing solutions using different bandwidth and latencies.Methods We audited the first 120 patients attending the telehealth clinic. During consultations, the patient was with the general practitioner (GP) and linked by internet videoconference using VIDYO™, GoToMeeting™ or Skype™, to the specialist at a tertiary referral hospital. Travel avoided was calculated and technical problems were assessed by the participating specialist. Bandwidth and latency variations were examined within a university broadband testing facility.ResultsThe two most frequently managed conditions were hepatitis C and latent tuberculosis. Twenty nine different GP's were included and 42 consultations required an interpreter. Nearly 500 km's of travel and 127kg of CO2 production was avoided per consultation. Technical issues were faced in 25% of consultations, most frequently sound problems, and connections dropping out. A bandwidth of at least 512 kbps and latency of no more than 300 milliseconds was necessary to conduct an adequate multipoint videoconference.Conclusions Telehealth using videoconferencing adds a new component to care of refugee and immigrant patients settling in regional areas. Telehealth will be improved by changes to improve simplicity and standardisation of videoconferencing, but requires ongoing Medicare funding to allow sufficient administrative support.
    Internal Medicine Journal 07/2014; 44(10). DOI:10.1111/imj.12537 · 1.64 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The development of communication technologies such as telephony, videoconferencing and web-conferencing in interpreter-mediated communication has led to alternative ways of delivering interpreting services. Several uses of these technologies can be distinguished in connection with interpreting. 'Remote interpreting' in the narrow sense often refers to their use to gain access to an interpreter in another location, but similar methods of interpreting are required for interpreting in virtual meetings in which the primary participants themselves are distributed across different sites. In spite of their different underlying motivations, these methods of interpreting all share elements of remote working from the interpreter's point of view and will therefore be subsumed here under one heading. Although the practice of remote interpreting (in all its forms) is controversial among interpreters, the last two decades have seen an increase in this practice in all fields of interpreting. As such, it has also caught the attention of scholars, who have begun to investigate remote interpreting, for example, with a view to the quality of the interpreter's performance and a range of psychological and physiological factors. This chapter will begin by explaining the key terms and concepts associated with remote interpreting and then give an overview of the historical development and current trends of remote interpreting in supra-national institutions, legal, healthcare and other settings, referring to current and emerging practice and to insights from research. This will be followed by the presentations of recommendations for practice and an outlook at future directions of this practice and for research.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The quality and performance of several videoconferencing applications (apps) tested on iOS (Apple, Cupertino, CA) and Android™ (Google, Mountain View, CA) mobile platforms using Wi-Fi (802.11), third-generation (3G), and fourth-generation (4G) cellular networks are described. The tests were done to determine how well apps perform compared with videoconferencing software installed on computers or with more traditional videoconferencing using dedicated hardware. The rationale for app assessment and the testing methodology are described. Findings are discussed in relation to operating system platform (iOS or Android) for which the apps were designed and the type of network (Wi-Fi, 3G, or 4G) used. The platform, network, and apps interact, and it is impossible to discuss videoconferencing experienced on mobile devices in relation to one of these factors without referencing the others. Apps for mobile devices can vary significantly from other videoconferencing software or hardware. App performance increased over the testing period due to improvements in network infrastructure and how apps manage bandwidth.
    Telemedicine and e-Health 07/2015; DOI:10.1089/tmj.2015.0027 · 1.67 Impact Factor