Article

Disparities among US states in HIV-related mortality in persons with HIV infection, 2001-2007.

Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
AIDS (London, England) (Impact Factor: 6.56). 01/2012; 26(1):95-103. DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32834dcf87
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To examine interstate variation in US HIV case-fatality rates, and compare them with corresponding conventional HIV death rates.
Cross-sectional analysis using data on deaths due to HIV infection from the National Vital Statistics System and data on persons 15 years or older living with HIV infection in 2001-2007 in 37 US states from the national HIV/AIDS Reporting System.
State rankings by age-adjusted HIV case-fatality rates (with HIV-infected population denominators) were compared with rankings by conventional death rates (with general population denominators). Negative binomial regression determined case-fatality rate ratios among states, adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, year, and state-level markers of late HIV diagnosis.
On the basis of 3,096,729 HIV-infected person-years, the overall HIV case-fatality rate was 20.6 per 1000 person-years [95% confidence interval (CI) 20.3-20.9]. Age-adjusted rates by state ranged from 9.6 (95% CI 6.8-12.4) in Idaho to 32.9 (95% CI 29.8-36.0) in Mississippi, demonstrating significant differences across states, even after adjusting for race/ethnicity (P < 0.0001). Many states with low conventional death rates had high case-fatality rates. Nine of the 10 states with the highest case-fatality rates were located in the southern United States.
Case-fatality rates complement and are not entirely concordant with conventional death rates. Interstate differences in these rates may reflect differences in secondary and tertiary prevention of HIV-related mortality among infected persons. These data suggest that state-specific contextual barriers to care may impede improvements in quality and disparities of healthcare without targeted interventions.

1 Bookmark
 · 
146 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to explore the racial and ethnic disparities in initiation of antiretroviral treatment (ARV treatment or ART) among HIV-infected Medicaid enrollees 18-64 years of age in 14 southern states which have high prevalence of HIV/AIDS and high racial disparities in HIV treatment access and mortality. We used Medicaid claims data from 2005 to 2007 for a retrospective cohort study. We compared frequency variances of HIV treatment uptake among persons of different racial- ethnic groups using univariate and multivariate methods. The unadjusted odds ratio was estimated through multinomial logistic regression. The multinomial logistic regression model was repeated with adjustment for multiple covariates. Of the 23,801 Medicaid enrollees who met criteria for initiation of ARV treatment, only one third (34.6%) received ART consistent with national guideline treatment protocols, and 21.5% received some ARV medication, but with sub-optimal treatment profiles. There was no significant difference in the proportion of people who received ARV treatment between black (35.8%) and non-Hispanic whites (35.7%), but Hispanic/Latino persons (26%) were significantly less likely to receive ARV treatment. Overall ARV treatment levels for all segments of the population are less than optimal. Among the Medicaid population there are no racial HIV treatment disparities between Black and White persons living with HIV, which suggests the potential relevance of Medicaid to currently uninsured populations, and the potential to achieve similar levels of equality within Medicaid for Hispanic/Latino enrollees and other segments of the Medicaid population.
    PLoS ONE 04/2014; 9(4):e96148. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0096148 · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The South has the highest rates of HIV infection, HIV-related mortality, and many other adverse health outcomes in the United States. A number of social, structural, and policy factors drive the poorer health and HIV status of Southerners relative to other Americans. The South's worse health partly reflects its larger proportion of African Americans, who experience disadvantages in health in all US regions, due to poverty and racial discrimination. But after adjustment for race/ethnicity, HIV case-fatality rates for nearly all Southern states are double those of the state with the lowest rate. Challenges to HIV prevention and care in the region include its large rural population combined with a shortage of providers with expertise in HIV treatment, lingering distrust of the healthcare system, homophobia, and stigma toward people with HIV infection. Moreover, government policies, facilitated by restrictions on voting, often reduce access to HIV prevention and care through Medicaid, antiretroviral drugs, sex education, and syringe exchange programs. Many Southern states have pursued - and continue to pursue - policies that impede earlier detection and treatment. These policies directly and indirectly fuel the increased HIV incidence, morbidity, and mortality that characterize the region and arguably represent a human rights violation.
    AIDS (London, England) 02/2014; 28(10). DOI:10.1097/QAD.0000000000000225 · 6.56 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although region and neighborhood condition's effect on HIV/sexually transmitted infection (STI) risk has been studied separately, there is little research examining their interplay. African American adolescents (n = 1,602) from four matched cities in the Northeastern and Southeastern US completed Audio Computer Assisted Self-Interviews and submitted biospecimen samples to detect Sexually Transmitted Infections (chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomonas). Logistic and negative binomial regressions determined HIV/STI risk differences by region, neighborhood stress, and stress-region dyads. Northeastern participants demonstrated lower HIV/STI risk while participants from higher stress neighborhoods exhibited greater risk. Relationships between neighborhood condition and ever having anal sex (p < 0.01), anal condom use (p < 0.05), and number of anal partners (p < 0.05) were significant in the Northeast only. Participants in unstressed Northeastern neighborhoods were less likely to have vaginal sex than those in comparable Southeastern neighborhoods (p < 0.05). Participants in unfavorable Northeastern neighborhoods had fewer anal partners than participants in comparable Southeastern neighborhoods (p < 0.01). In concert, neighborhood and region differentially affect HIV/STI risk.
    AIDS and Behavior 08/2014; DOI:10.1007/s10461-014-0868-y · 3.49 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
7 Downloads
Available from
Sep 19, 2014