M1557 Survival Impact of Malignant Pancreatic Neuroendocrine and Islet Cell Neoplasm Phenotypes

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9155, USA.
Journal of Surgical Oncology (Impact Factor: 2.84). 05/2009; 105(6):595-600. DOI: 10.1002/jso.22118
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The low incidence of malignant "functional" (F) or "nonfunctional" (NF) neuroendocrine islet cell tumors (ICTs) of the pancreas represents a challenge to precise post-therapeutic survival prediction. This study examined the survival impact of malignant pancreatic ICT morphologic subtypes.
A pancreatic ICT data set was created from a US-based population database from 1980-2004. Prognostic factors with survival impact and relationships between surgical therapy and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.
There were 2,350 individuals with malignant ICTs. Histologic subtypes included carcinoid tumors, islet cell carcinomas, neuroendocrine carcinomas, and malignant gastrinomas, insulinomas, glucagonomas, or VIPomas. There was no difference in resection rates between FICTs and NFICTs (23% vs. 20%, P = ns). Median OS was 30 months, with group differences ranging from NE carcinomas (21) to VIPomas (96; P < 0.0001). Median OS of resected versus unresected FICTs was 172 versus 37 months, while that of NFICTs was 113 versus 18 months (P < 0.0001). Compared to neuroendocrine carcinomas, hazard ratios were: VIPomas 0.48, gastrinomas 0.65, carcinoid tumors 0.76, insulinomas 0.84, glucagonomas 0.93, and islet cell carcinomas 1.0.
When controlled for other established prognostic parameters, histopathologic subtype assignment of pancreatic ICTs affects survival prediction. Resection is associated with superior survival for all tumor types.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hypothesis: Lymph node metastases decrease survival in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs). Design: Prospective database searches. Setting: National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Stanford University Hospital (SUH). Patients: A total of 326 patients underwent surgical exploration for pNETs at the NIH (n=216) and SUH (n=110). Main Outcome Measures: Overall survival, diseaserelated survival, and time to development of liver metastases. Results: Forty patients (12.3%) underwent enucleation and 305 (93.6%) underwent resection. Of the patients who underwent resection, 117 (35.9%) had partial pancreatectomy and 30 (9.2%) had a Whipple procedure. Forty-one patients also had liver resections, 21 had wedge resections, and 20 had lobectomies. Mean follow-up was 8.1 years (range, 0.3-28.6 years). The 10-year overall survival for patients with no metastases or lymph node metastases only was similar at 80%. As expected, patients with liver metastases had a significantly decreased 10-year survival of 30% (P<.001). The time to development of liver metastases was significantly reduced for patients with lymph node metastases alone compared with those with none (P<.001). For the NIH cohort with longer follow-up, disease-related survival was significantly different for those patients with no metastases, lymph node metastases alone, and liver metastases (P<.001). Extent of lymph node involvement in this subgroup showed that disease-related survival decreased as a function of the number of lymph nodes involved (P=.004). Conclusions: As expected, liver metastases decrease survival of patients with pNETs. Patients with lymph node metastases alone have a shorter time to the development of liver metastases that is dependent on the number of lymph nodes involved. With sufficient long-term follow-up, lymph node metastases decrease diseaserelated survival. Careful evaluation of number and extent of lymph node involvement is warranted in all surgical procedures for pNETs.
    Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill.: 1960) 09/2012; 147(9):820-7. DOI:10.1001/archsurg.2012.1261 · 4.30 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of evidence regarding incidence and predictors of survival in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) ≤2 cm in size. METHODS: Patients having undergone resection for nonfunctioning PNETs were selected from the SEER database (1988-2009) and an institutional pathology database (1996-2012). PNETs ≤2 cm were compared with PNETs >2 cm. Data were analyzed with χ (2) tests, ANOVA, the Kaplan-Meier method, log rank tests, and Cox proportional hazard, and binary logistic regression. RESULTS: The incidence of PNETs ≤2 cm in the United States has increased by 710.4 % over the last 22 years. Rates of extrapancreatic extension, nodal metastasis, and distant metastasis in PNETs ≤2 cm in the SEER database were 17.9, 27.3, and 9.1 %, respectively. The rate of nodal metastasis in our institutional series was 5.7 %. Disease-specific survival at 5, 10, and 15 years for PNETs ≤2 cm was 91.5, 84.0, and 76.8 %. Decreased disease-specific survival was not associated with nodal metastasis, but rather with high grade [moderately differentiated, hazard ratio (HR) 37.2, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.7-518.8; poorly differentiated, HR 94.2, 95 % CI 4.9-1,794.4; reference, well differentiated], and minority race (Asian, HR 30.2, 95 % CI 3.1-291.7; Black, HR 60.1, 95 % CI 2.1-1,027.9; reference, White). CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors ≤2 cm are increasingly common, and the most significant predictors of disease-specific survival are grade and race. The SEER database excludes PNETs considered to be benign, and rates of extrapancreatic extension, nodal metastasis, and distant metastasis are overestimated. Small size, however, does not preclude malignant behavior.
    Annals of Surgical Oncology 06/2013; 20(9). DOI:10.1245/s10434-013-3005-7 · 3.94 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: With the popularity of interventional radiology, diagnostic material obtained can be limited requiring critical decisions on making the best use of it. Molecular testing using nanogram amounts of tissue can add useful diagnostic information by improving sensitivity and/or specificity of the diagnosis. This review examines the use of molecular tests in cervical cytology, "indeterminate" thyroid cytology specimens, pancreatic cyst fluid, urinary tract and pulmonary adenocarcinoma cytologic material. Molecular human papillomavirus (HPV) testing combined with cervical cytology increases sensitivity of detection of high grade lesions. In cytologically negative cases, the HPV negative predictive value endorses longer screening intervals. With the high prevalence of benign thyroid nodules, cytology plays a vital role in screening. However, 10-40% of the specimens obtained are cytologically indeterminate. Molecular analysis of these specimens can predict the malignant risk in these cases. Increased detection of pancreatic cysts has necessitated accurate pre-operative diagnosis delineating non-mucinous from mucinous cysts, which have a potential for progression to adenocarcinoma. Multimodal diagnosis of pancreatic cysts and molecular analysis help to clarify neoplastic risk; and in cases of limited fluid, may be the only available diagnostic information. Urothelial carcinoma (UC) of the bladder, a common cancer with frequent recurrences, requires lifelong surveillance. The UroVysion ™ test kit can increase the sensitivity of detection of UC especially in cases of residual/recurrent carcinoma after therapy. Subsets of lung adenocarcinomas are now commonly targeted by therapies based on molecular mutation results of epidermal growth factor receptor, KRAS or echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase re-arrangements. The move toward standardization of reporting of cytology specimens commencing with cervical smears and more recently, thyroid cytology specimens is also changing the practice of cytopathology. Combining the stringent cytology criteria with ancillary molecular testing is expected to yield more discrete and diagnostic categories for research and reporting. The profession is at an exciting point of implementing novel molecular markers to refine diagnostic criteria and create clinically relevant classification systems.
    CytoJournal 03/2014; 11:5. DOI:10.4103/1742-6413.129183
Show more