Article

Medial branch neurotomy in low back pain

Department of Diagnostic and Molecular Imaging, Interventional Radiology and Radiotherapy University "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Neuroradiology (Impact Factor: 2.37). 10/2011; 54(7):737-44. DOI: 10.1007/s00234-011-0968-6
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of pulsed radiofrequency medial branch dorsal ramus neurotomy in patients with facet joint syndrome.
From January 2008 to April 2010, 92 patients with facet joint syndrome diagnosed by strict inclusion criteria and controlled diagnostic blocks undergone medial branch neurotomy. We did not exclude patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). Electrodes (20G) with 5-mm active tip were placed under fluoroscopy guide parallel to medial branch. Patients were followed up by physical examination and by Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Disability Index at 1, 6, and 12 months.
In all cases, pain improvement was statistically significant and so quality of life. Three non-FBSS patients had to undergo a second neurotomy because of non-satisfactory pain decrease. Complications were reported in no case.
Medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy has confirmed its well-established effectiveness in pain and quality of life improvement as long as strict inclusion criteria be fulfilled and nerve ablation be accomplished by parallel electrode positioning. This statement can be extended also to FBSS patients.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
136 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous pulse-dose radiofrequency (PDRF) for the treatment of chronic pain in patients with pudendal neuralgia (PN) unresponsive to conservative approaches. From March 2010 to January 2012, 30 patients with a diagnosis of PN were prospectively enrolled in the study, 18 women and 12 men (mean age 47 years). A 20-gauge cannula with a 10-cm length was placed under CT guide in the pudendal (Alcock's) canal. After the spindle was removed, a radiofrequency needle with a 5-mm active tip was introduced. The appropriate needle placement near the pudendal nerve, without an involvement of the vessels, was confirmed with an injection of 1-2 ml of contrast agent. PDRF was performed with 1,200 pulses at high voltage (45 V) with 20 ms duration followed by 480 ms silent phases. Twenty-six patients completed the study. Procedural success was achieved in all patients. Mean VAS scores before PDRF was 9 ± 0.7. Patients had a great improvement in pain intensity after 1 week by PDRF (mean VAS scores 3.8 ± 1.7, p < 0.05), with a stabilization of the symptomatology in the following months (mean VAS scores 1.5 ± 1.1 at 6 months by PDRF, p < 0.05) and excellent results after 1 year by the procedure (mean VAS scores 1.9 ± 0.7, p < 0.05). In our preliminary experience, CT-guided percutaneous PDRF should be recommended for treatment of PN because we evaluated the tolerability of this procedure with satisfactory and encouraging results.
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 08/2013; 37(2). DOI:10.1007/s00270-013-0679-y · 2.09 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To study the effectiveness of surgical dorsal endoscopic tizotomy for the treatment of facetogenic chronic low back pain. Methods: From April 2011 to November 2011,58 patients who were diagnosed with lumbar facetogenic chronic low back pain (CLBP) and thereafter experienced >80% reliefs of pain with two comparative lumbar medial branch blocks were recruited in the study. Of those 58 patients, 45 cases (the operation group) received dorsal endoscopic rhizotomy, and the remaining 13 cases (the conservative group) received conservative treatment. Patients' preoperative and postoperative VAS score, percentage of pain relief and the MacNab score were analyzed and compared. Anatomic variations and any possible complications were recorded. Results: In the operation group, VAS scores of pain (low back/referred) at any time point postoperatively were significantly lower than that before MBB (P< 0.05), which, however, showed no significant difference as compared to the scores after MBB (P> 0.05). In the conservative group, VAS scores of pain (low back/referred) at any time point postoperatively with conservative treatment decreased significantly compared with that before MBB (P< 0.05) and were significantly higher than that after MBB (P< 0.05). Percentage of pain relief in the operation group at any time point postoperatively were significantly higher than that in the conservative group (P< 0.01). The MacNab scores of 1 year follow-up in the operation group were higher than that in the conservative group. In addition, four separate newly identified anatomical variations of medial branch anatomy were observed and reported. Conclusion: Dorsal endoscopic rhizotomy is safe and effective for the facetogenic CLBP, and can achieve better clinical outcome than the conservative treatment.
    Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 08/2014; 126C:11-17. DOI:10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.08.014 · 1.25 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article describes the costs and risk factors for failed back surgery syndrome and reviews the diagnosis and treatment strategies commonly used to address this syndrome. The purpose of this review is to describe some of the treatment pitfalls associated with these approaches from a physiatric perspective.
    Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America 05/2014; 25(2):319-340. DOI:10.1016/j.pmr.2014.01.014 · 1.09 Impact Factor