Trends in Selected Chronic Conditions and Behavioral Risk Factors Among Women of Reproductive Age, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2001-2009

Hawaii Department of Health, Family Health Services Division, 3652 Kilauea Ave, Honolulu, HI 96816, USA.
Preventing chronic disease (Impact Factor: 2.12). 11/2011; 8(6):A120.
Source: PubMed


Some potentially modifiable risk factors and chronic conditions cause significant disease and death during pregnancy and promote the development of chronic disease. This study describes recent trends of modifiable risk factors and controllable chronic conditions among reproductive-aged women.
Data from the 2001 to 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, a representative state-based telephone survey of health behavior in US adults, was analyzed for 327,917 women of reproductive age, 18 to 44 years. We calculated prevalence ratios over time to assess trends for 4 selected risk factors and 4 chronic conditions, accounting for age, race/ethnicity, education, health care coverage, and individual states.
From 2001 to 2009, estimates of 2 risk factors improved: smoking declined from 25.9% to 18.8%, and physical inactivity declined from 25.0% to 23.0%. One risk factor, heavy drinking, did not change. From 2003 to 2009, the estimates for 1 risk factor and 4 chronic conditions worsened: obesity increased from 18.3% to 24.7%, diabetes increased from 2.1% to 2.9%, high cholesterol increased from 10.3% to 13.6%, asthma increased from 13.5% to 16.2%, and high blood pressure increased from 9.0% to 10.1%. All trends were significant after adjustment, except that for heavy drinking.
Among women of reproductive age, prevalence of smoking and physical inactivity improved, but prevalence of obesity and all 4 chronic conditions worsened. Understanding reasons for the improvements in smoking and physical activity may support the development of targeted interventions to reverse the trends and help prevent chronic disease and adverse reproductive outcomes among women in this age group.


Available from: Donald Hayes, Sep 22, 2014
  • Source
    • "One factor affecting the adoption (or lack of adoption) of WC or WHR may be the current reliance on inexpensive self-reported BMI measures, and the concomitant uncertainty among the research community about the validity of self measured waist and hip data. Self-reported height and weight, which is used to estimate BMI, has been widely used e.g., [12,13]; and the validity and biases associated with self-reported height and weight have been the subject of considerable research since at least the 1980s [14]. These have included, for instance, validity studies from Asia [15-17], North America [18], Central America [19], and Europe [20]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Measures of central adiposity are better predictors of adverse health events than BMI. Nonetheless, BMI is more widely used in health research. One reason for this may be the limited research supporting the self-measurement of waist and hip circumference. The lack of validity studies is particularly acute in Asia. The main objective was to establish the validity of self-measurement of waist and hip circumference in a community setting and the correlation of those measures with BMI, blood pressure, and blood glucose levels. A community based, cross-sectional survey. A "healthy living expo" at a shopping mall in a rural town on peninsular Malaysia One hundred and thirty six (136) individuals volunteered to participate in the study, 125 of whom met the inclusion criteria. The ethnic distribution of the participants was 80% Chinese, 17% Malay and 3% Indian. Most participants were female (60%), with participants' ages ranging from 18 to 78 years (mean, 47.2). Self and assisted measurements of waist and hip were taken. Blood pressure, non-fasting blood glucose, height, and weight were also measured. Bland Altman plots and Lin's concordance coefficient were used to measure agreement between self and assisted measures. Pearson's correlation was used to examine the association of self and assisted measures with blood pressure, blood glucose, and BMI. There was a downwards bias in self measured waist (-0.81 cm) and hip (-1 cm) circumferences compared with assisted measures. The concordance for the self and assisted measures of waist, hip and the ratio of the two were, respectively, .96, .93 , and .84. The correlation between measures of central adiposity and BMI, blood pressure and blood glucose were similar for self and assisted measures. The results provide additional support for the use of self-measurement of waist and hip circumference studies of central adiposity, but is limited by the specificity of the setting.
    Nutrition Journal 10/2013; 12(1):135. DOI:10.1186/1475-2891-12-135 · 2.60 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Diabetes is a chronic condition, requiring adherence to optimal glycemic control prior to conception and in the first trimester in order to reduce risk of adverse maternal-fetal outcomes. Women with diabetes have increased risk for preeclampsia , depression, preterm delivery, cesarean section, and almost a three times greater risk of having a baby with a major congenital anomaly than women without diabetes [1] [2] [3] [4]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aim: Assess differences in pregnancy planning and behavioral risk factors among women of reproductive age, by diabetes status. Methods: A secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2002 and 2004) was conducted. Subjects were 18-44-year-old, non-pregnant, fertile women, grouped into two categories: non-diabetes (n=57,436), and diabetes (n=2929). Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted prevalence odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Results: Approximately 93% of women of reproductive age with or without diabetes are not intending a pregnancy, and yet among them, women with diabetes are 22% more likely not to use any birth control at all. Women with diabetes are 3.4 times more likely to be obese, 1.4 times more likely to be overweight, 35% less likely to drink any alcohol, and 27% less likely to binge drink alcohol, than women without diabetes. There were no differences in risk factors between women with diabetes that were and were not intending a pregnancy. Conclusions: Birth control nonuse for women with diabetes not intending a pregnancy and lack of behavioral change for women with diabetes intending a pregnancy, combined with an increasing prevalence in diabetes, will likely result in significant economic and social tolls on society.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice 11/2012; 99(1). DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2012.09.029 · 2.54 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The majority of literature on cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes in women of African descent focuses on postmenopausal patients. Clinical research in women of reproductive age is extremely limited. This article reviews the literature on cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes in women of reproductive age from Africa and the African Diaspora (African American, Afro-European, and Afro-Caribbean). The focus is on disparities in prevalence, outcomes, and recommendations for new and future diagnostic tests and therapies. The goal is to provide the clinician with information that will be useful in the management of these patients.
    Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports 06/2012; 6(3). DOI:10.1007/s12170-012-0229-1
Show more