In vivo flow speed measurement of capillaries by photoacoustic correlation spectroscopy

Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
Optics Letters (Impact Factor: 3.29). 10/2011; 36(20):4017-9. DOI: 10.1364/OL.36.004017
Source: PubMed


We recently proposed photoacoustic correlation spectroscopy (PACS) and demonstrated a proof-of-concept experiment. Here we use the technique for in vivo flow speed measurement in capillaries in a chick embryo model. The photoacoustic microscopy system is used to render high spatial resolution and high sensitivity, enabling sufficient signals from single red blood cells. The probe beam size is calibrated by a blood-mimicking phantom. The results indicate the feasibility of using PACS to study flow speeds in capillaries.

Download full-text


Available from: Paul L Carson, Oct 07, 2015
25 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The feasibility of making spatially resolved measurements of blood velocity using a pulsed photoacoustic Doppler technique in acoustic resolution mode has been investigated. Doppler time shifts were quantified via cross-correlation of photoacoustic waveform pairs generated within a blood-simulating phantom using pairs of light pulses. The phantom comprised micron-scale absorbers imprinted on an acetate sheet and moved at known velocities. The photoacoustic waves were detected using PZT ultrasound transducers operating at center frequencies of 20 MHz, 5 MHz and 3.5 MHz; measurements of velocity and resolution were calculated from the mean cross-correlation function of 25 waveform pairs. Velocities in the range ±0.15 to ±1.5 ms(-1) were quantified with accuracies as low as 1%. The transducer focal beam width determines a maximum measurable velocity |V(max)| beyond which correlation is lost due to absorbers moving out of the focal beam between the two laser pulses. Below |V(max)| a measurement resolution of <4% of the measured velocity was achieved. Resolution and |V(max)| can be scaled to much lower velocities such as those encountered in microvasculature (< 50 mms(-1)). The advantage of pulsed rather than continuous-wave excitation is that spatially resolved velocity measurements can be made, offering the prospect of mapping flow within the microcirculation.
    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 09/2012; 132(3):1780-91. DOI:10.1121/1.4739458 · 1.50 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We present a methodology to measure absolute flow velocity using laser-scanning photoacoustic microscopy. To obtain the Doppler angle, the angle between ultrasonic detection axis and flow direction, we extracted the distances between the transducer and three adjacent scanning points along the flow and repeatedly applied the law of cosines. To measure flow velocity along the ultrasonic detection axis, we calculated the time shift between two consecutive photoacoustic waves at the same scanning point, then converted the time shift to velocity according to the sound velocity and time interval between two laser illuminations. We verified our method by imaging flow phantoms.
    Applied Physics Letters 05/2013; 102(20):203501. DOI:10.1063/1.4807290 · 3.30 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Photoacoustic imaging (PAI) of biological tissue has seen immense growth in the past decade, providing unprecedented spatial resolution and functional information at depths in the optical diffusive regime. PAI uniquely combines the advantages of optical excitation and those of acoustic detection. The hybrid imaging modality features high sensitivity to optical absorption and wide scalability of spatial resolution with the desired imaging depth. Here we first summarize the fundamental principles underpinning the technology, then highlight its practical implementation, and finally discuss recent advances toward clinical translation. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering Volume 16 is July 01, 2014. Please see for revised estimates.
    Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 08/2013; 16(1). DOI:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071813-104553 · 14.21 Impact Factor
Show more