"The perspective of a wide-ranging contribution from evolutionary psychology has already captured the imagination of crime scientists (Roach and Pease, 2013), though reminders that adaption is an onerous explanatory concept, and that accounts of ultimate (evolutionary) causes must be accompanied by an understanding of proximal (e.g., neuropsychological) mechanisms, should be heeded (de Waal, 2002). In criminology, embryonic comparative research into the executive functioning of white collar criminals (Raine et al., 2012) hints at the possibility of tailoring prevention technologies by offending type. Executive functioning—self-regulation, but also the functions which underpin cognitive adaptability and flexibility— is likely to be a fruitful area of research for CS should it seek to account more deeply for the failure of many criminals to displace. "
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: A recent disciplinary offshoot of criminology, crime science (CS) defines itself as "the application of science to the control of crime." One of its stated ambitions is to act as a cross-disciplinary linchpin in the domain of crime reduction. Despite many practical successes, notably in the area of situational crime prevention (SCP), CS has yet to achieve a commensurate level of academic visibility. The case is made that the growth of CS is stifled by its reliance on a model of decision-making, the Rational Choice Perspective (RCP), which is inimical to the integration of knowledge and insights from the behavioral, cognitive and neurosciences (CBNs). Examples of salient developments in the CBNs are provided, as regards notably multiple-system perspectives of decision-making and approaches to person-environment interaction. Short and long-term benefits of integration for CS are briefly outlined.
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10/2013; 7:682. DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00682 · 2.99 Impact Factor
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Contemporary studies evidence that antisocial behavior of children and adults is associated with neuropsychological deficits of four types: 1) relatively low general intelligence; 2) deficit of verbal intelligence; 3) prefrontal dysfunction; 4) deficit of activation of limbic structures. In most cases the antisocial behavior is a consequence of brain underdevelopment due to effects of poor social environment. Nevertheless, heritability and dysfunction of catecholaminergic innervation predispose to antisocial behavior even when the social environment is favorable.
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Criminal behaviour and violence are increasingly viewed as worldwide public health problems. A growing body of knowledge shows that criminal behaviour has a neurobiological basis, and this has intensified judicial interest in the potential application of neuroscience to criminal law. It also gives rise to important questions. What are the implications of such application for predicting future criminal behaviour and protecting society? Can it be used to prevent violence? And what are the implications for the way offenders are punished?
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.