Article

Substance-induced psychoses: A critical review of the literature

Clinical Psychiatry, Clinical Neuropsychopharmacology Unit, IRCCS Foundation Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano MI, Italy.
Current Drug Abuse Reviews 12/2011; 4(4):228-40. DOI: 10.2174/1874473711104040228
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Substances with psychotomimetic properties such as cocaine, amphetamines, hallucinogens and cannabis are widespread, and their use or abuse can provoke psychotic reactions resembling a primary psychotic disease. The recent escalating use of methamphetamine throughout the world and its association with psychotic symptoms in regular users has fuelled concerns. The use of cannabis and cocaine by young people has considerably increased over recent years, and age at first use has dramatically decreased. There is some evidence that cannabis is now on the market in a more potent form than in previous decades. Furthermore, a large number of studies have reported a link between adolescent cannabis use and the development of stable psychosis in early adulthood. The situation is further complicated by the high rates of concomitant substance use by subjects with a psychotic illness which, especially in young users with an early-phase psychotic disorder, can make diagnosis difficult. This paper reviews the literature concerning the properties of psychotogenic substances and the psychotic symptoms they can give rise to, and discusses the association between substance abuse and psychosis with particular emphasis on the differential diagnosis of a primary and substance-induced psychotic disorder. The findings of this review indicate that psychosis due to substance abuse is commonly observed in clinical practice. The propensity to develop psychosis seems to be a function of the severity of use and dependence. From a phenomenological point of view, it is possible to identify some elements that may help clinicians involved in differential diagnoses between primary and substance-induced psychoses. There remains a striking paucity of information on the outcomes, treatments, and best practices of substance-induced psychotic episodes.

4 Followers
 · 
277 Views
  • Source
    • "In line with earlier studies that have found links between survival sex and stimulant use (Chettiar, Shannon, Wood, Zhang, & Kerr, 2010; Semple, Strathdee, Zians, & Patterson, 2011), we observed that stimulant users were twice as likely to be engaging in survival sex, than cannabis users. We also observed cannabis use to be strongly associated with the existence of psychotic disorders (Fiorentini et al., 2011; Moore et al., 2007) as is commonly known. Interestingly, stimulant users were more likely to be dealing with drugs—both buying and selling—than cannabis users. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: High rates of substance use, especially cannabis and stimulant use, have been associated with homelessness, exposure to trauma, and involvement with the criminal justice system. This study explored differences in substance use (cannabis vs. stimulants) and associations with trauma and incarceration among a homeless population. Data were derived from the BC Health of the Homeless Study (BCHOHS), carried out in three cities in British Columbia, Canada. Measures included sociodemographic information, the Maudsley Addiction Profile (MAP), the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) Plus. Stimulant users were more likely to be female (43%), using multiple substances (3.2), and engaging in survival sex (14%). Cannabis users had higher rates of lifetime psychotic disorders (32%). Among the incarcerated, cannabis users had been subjected to greater emotional neglect (p < .05) and one in two cannabis users had a history of lifetime depressive disorders (p < .05). Childhood physical abuse and Caucasian ethnicity were also associated with greater crack cocaine use. One explanation for the results is that a history of childhood abuse may lead to a developmental cascade of depressive symptoms and other psychopathology, increasing the chances of cannabis dependence and the development of psychosis.
    International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 07/2014; DOI:10.1177/0306624X14541661 · 0.84 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Acute and chronic exposure to cocaine is associated with significant psychiatric co-morbidities of which psychotic symptoms are one of the most typical (Roncero et al., 2001). The symptoms seen most frequently are paranoid ideation and the auditory and visual hallucinations (Fiorentini et al., 2011). The cocaine-induced psychotic symptoms (CIPS) are aggressive serious adverse effects and may lead to psychomotor agitation and behaviours potentially lifethreatening (Vorspan et al., 2001). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cocaine use is significantly associated with psychiatric co-morbidities of which psychotic symptoms are the most typical. The primary goal of this study is to estimate the life-time prevalence of cocaine-induced psychotic symptoms (CIPS) in a sample of patients without a history of primary psychosis, who attended specific out-patient drug-dependence treatment centres (ODDTCs). This is an observational, cross-sectional design and a consecutive sampling technique. The Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms-Cocaine Induced Psychosis (SAPS-CIP) was used to interview 114 patients who request treatment at specific ODDTCs for problems related to cocaine use. Most patients, 89.5% (95% CIs: 83.8%-95.2%) had dependence of cocaine and 84.2% (95% CIs: 77.5%-90.9%) showed at least one CIPS. Patients with CIPS had used cocaine more times throughout their and had a more frequency of use during the period of higher abuse severity in the last year, had higher severity of dependence score and had fewer abstinence periods greater than 30 days compared with those without CIPS. Cocaine dependency severity scale scores were significantly greater in patients with CIP compared with those without CIP.
    Psychiatry Research 06/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2014.02.024 · 2.68 Impact Factor
  • Source
Show more