Predictors of long-term pain and disability in patients with low back pain investigated by magnetic resonance imaging: A longitudinal study

MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. .
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (Impact Factor: 1.9). 10/2011; 12:234. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-234
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT It is possible that clinical outcome of low back pain (LBP) differs according to the presence or absence of spinal abnormalities on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in which case there could be value in using MRI findings to refine case definition of LBP in epidemiological research. We therefore conducted a longitudinal study to explore whether spinal abnormalities on MRI for LBP predict prognosis after 18 months.
A consecutive series of patients aged 20-64 years, who were investigated by MRI because of mechanical LBP (median duration of current episode 16.2 months), were identified from three radiology departments, and those who agreed completed self-administered questionnaires at baseline and after a mean follow-up period of 18.5 months (a mean of 22.2 months from MRI investigation). MRI scans were assessed blind to other clinical information, according to a standardised protocol. Associations of baseline MRI findings with pain and disability at follow-up, adjusted for treatment and for other potentially confounding variables, were assessed by Poisson regression and summarised by prevalence ratios (PRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Questionnaires were completed by 240 (74%) of the patients who had agreed to be followed up. Among these 111 men and 129 women, 175 (73%) reported LBP in the past four weeks, 89 (37%) frequent LBP, and 72 (30%) disabling LBP. In patients with initial disc degeneration there was an increased risk of frequent (PR 1.3, 95%CI 1.0-1.9) and disabling LBP (PR 1.7, 95%CI 1.1-2.5) at follow-up. No other associations were found between MRI abnormalities and subsequent outcome.
Our findings suggest that the MRI abnormalities examined are not major predictors of outcome in patients with LBP. They give no support to the use of MRI findings as a way of refining case definition for LBP in epidemiological research.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The evidence that compensation related factors are associated with poor recovery is substantial but these measures are generic and do not consider the complexity of scheme design. The objectives of this study were to understand people's perceptions and experiences of the claims process after sustaining a compensable injury in a motor vehicle crash (including why people seek legal representation); and to explore ways to assist people following a compensable injury and improve their experience with the claims process. A qualitative study in a Compulsory Third Party (CTP) personal injury scheme covering the state of New South Wales (NSW), Australia. A series of five focus groups, with a total of 32 participants who had sustained mild to moderate injuries in a motor vehicle crash, were conducted from May to June 2011 with four to eight attendees in each group. These were audio-recorded and transcribed. The methodology was based on a grounded theory approach using thematic analysis and constant comparison to generate coding categories for themes. Data saturation was reached. Analyst triangulation was used to ensure credibility of the results. Five primary themes were identified: complexity of the claims process; requirement of legal representation; injury recovery expectations; importance of timely healthcare decision making; and improvements for injury recovery. Some participants struggled, finding the claims process stressful and subsequently sought legal advice; whilst others reported a straight forward recovery, helpful insurer interactions and no legal representation. Most participants were influenced by injury recovery expectations, and timely healthcare decision making. To assist with injury recovery, access to objective information about the claims process using online technology and social media was considered paramount. Participants had contrasting injury recovery experiences and their perceptions of the claims process differed and were influenced by injury recovery expectations, and timeliness of healthcare decision making. Improvements to the claims process are required, including: simplification or streamlining (possibly using online technology and/or social media to reduce paperwork); and providing access to objective information. There is a need to trial early interventions and new claims management policies that could improve injury recovery and satisfaction with the claims process.
    BMC Public Health 04/2015; 15(1):423. DOI:10.1186/s12889-015-1739-9 · 2.32 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Context: Low back pain (LBP) is highly prevalent and presents an enormous cost both through direct healthcare and indirectly through significant work and production loss. LBP is acknowledged widely to be a multifactorial pathology with a variety of symptoms, dysfunctions and a number of possible sources of pain. One source that has been suspected and evidenced for some time are the intervertebral discs. Some degree of disc degeneration is a physiologic process associated with aging, however, more severe degeneration and/or structural abnormality may be indicative of a pathological process or injury, and is more commonly present in those suffering from LBP. Much like other tissue’s (i.e. muscle, bone etc.) it has been suspected that there exists an optimal loading strategy to promote the health of the disc. Exercise is often prescribed for LBP and effectively reduces pain and disability. However, whether specific loading through exercise might plausibly heal or regenerate the intervertebral discs is unknown. Purpose: Thus the purpose of this brief review was to examine the effects of loading upon regenerative processes in the intervertebral disc and consider the potential for specific exercise to apply loading to the lumbar spine to produce these effects. Study Design: A brief narrative literature review Methods: Studies examining the effects of loading upon the intervertebral discs were reviewed to examine the plausibility of using loading through exercise to induce regeneration or healing of the intervertebral disc. Results: Research from animal model studies suggests the existence of a dose-response relationship between loading and regenerative processes. Though high loading at high volumes and frequencies might accelerate degeneration or produce disc injury, high loading, yet of low volume and at low frequency appears to induce potentially regenerative mechanisms including improvements in disc proteoglycan content, matrix gene expression, rate of cell apoptosis and improved fluid flow and solute transport. Conclusions: Research suggests a dose-response relationship between loading and disc regenerative processes and that the loading pattern typically utilised in lumbar extension resistance exercise interventions (high load, low volume, low frequency) might impart healing or regeneration of the intervertebral discs. Future research should examine an exercise intervention with in vivo measurement of changes in disc condition. This may provide further evidence for the ‘black box’ of treatment mechanisms associated with exercise interventions.
    The Spine Journal 01/2014; · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose Despite extensive evidence for the treatment effectiveness of interdisciplinary functional restoration (FR) for chronic disabling occupational musculoskeletal disorders (CDOMD), there is little documentation on the cost-effectiveness of early rehabilitation using FR. Methods A total of 1,119 CDOMD patients were classified according to duration of disability on FR entry, corresponding to early rehabilitation (ER: 4-8 months of disability, N = 373), intermediate duration (ID: 9-18 months, N = 373), and delayed rehabilitation (DR: >18 months, N = 373). Groups were matched on sex, age, ethnicity, and injured musculoskeletal region. One-year post-rehabilitation outcomes included return-to-work, work retention and healthcare utilization. Economic analyses included a cost-effectiveness analysis of the FR program, and estimation of the total cost-of-illness. Results At 1-year post-rehabilitation, all groups were comparable on return-to-work (overall 88 %), work retention (overall 80 %), and additional healthcare utilization (overall, 2.2 % of patients received re-operations/new surgeries, 2 visits to new healthcare provider). Savings of up to 64 % in medical costs, and up to 80 % in disability benefits and productivity losses was associated with the ER group. The cost of rehabilitation was also up to 56 % lower when administered early. Overall, ER resulted in estimated cost savings of up to 72 % (or almost $170,000 per claim). Conclusions Duration of disability does not negatively impact objective work or healthcare utilization outcomes following interdisciplinary FR. However, early rehabilitation is more likely to be a cost-effective solution compared to cases that progress >8 months and receiving FR as a treatment of "last resort".
    Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 09/2014; 25(2). DOI:10.1007/s10926-014-9539-0 · 2.80 Impact Factor

Preview (3 Sources)

Available from