Article

Myasthenia Gravis: A Review of Available Treatment Approaches

Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, 5020 Bergen, Norway.
Autoimmune diseases 10/2011; 2011(1):847393. DOI: 10.4061/2011/847393
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Patients with autoimmune myasthenia gravis (MG) should be further classified before initiating therapy, as treatment response varies for ocular versus generalised, early onset versus late onset, and acetylcholine receptor antibody positive versus MuSK antibody positive disease. Most patients need immunosuppression in addition to symptomatic therapy. Prednisolone and azathioprine represent first choice drugs, whereas several second choice options are recommended and should be considered. Thymectomy should be undertaken in MG with thymoma and in generalised, early-onset MG. For MG crises and other acute exacerbations, intravenous immunoglobulin (IvIg) and plasma exchange are equally effective and safe treatments. Children and females in child bearing age need special attention regarding potential side effects of immunosuppressive therapy. MG pathogenesis is known in detail, but the immune therapy is still surprisingly unspecific, without a pin-pointed attack on the defined disease-inducing antigen-antibody reaction being available.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Geir OLve Skeie, Aug 14, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
177 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT:  Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder mediated by antibodies against the acethylcholine receptor (AchR) of the neuromuscular junction in the majority of patients.  Here, we examined IgG antibodies against the type 1 nuclear antigen of Epstein-Barr virus (EBNA-1) in the sera of 158 patients with MG compared to 184 healthy controls. Although serum concentration in the sera was not different, high anti-EBNA-1 IgG titers (above 90th percentile of the normal values) were more common in the patients (26.6 vs. 16.3%, P=0.024). In addition, high EBNA-1 IgG levels occurred more frequently amongst the 94 patients with early-onset myasthenia gravis (EOMG, 30.8%) as compared to the 64 patients with late-onset disease (LOMG, 14.1%) (P=0.021). Using multiple logistic regression, high serum concentration of the anti-EBNA-1 IgG antibodies was significantly associated with EOMG (OR: 3.17, P=0.027), even after adjustment for sex, presence/absence of anti-AchR antibodies and presence/absence of anti-Titin antibodies. Out of 39 patients with EOMG, who underwent thymectomy, 18 patients (46%) had thymoma, 6 had thymic hyperplasia (15%), and 15 patients had thymic atrophy (39%); there was no difference comparing EBNA-1 antibody titers in the sera. As no correlation was found between the titers of anti-AchR, anti-Titin, and EBNA-1 antibodies, a dysregulated heterogeneous B-cell response was unlikely to be responsible for the elevated levels of EBV-associated antibody in patients.   In summary, our data suggest that high levels of EBNA-1 antibodies are more common in MG compared to healthy controls and are especially associated with EOMG.
    European Journal of Neurology 01/2012; 19(6):842-6. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03636.x · 3.85 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Acquired myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare antibody-mediated autoimmune disease caused by impaired neuromuscular transmission, leading to abnormal muscle fatigability. The aetiology is complex, including genetic risk factors of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) complex and unknown environmental factors. Although associations between the HLA complex and MG are well established, not all involved components of the HLA predisposition to this heterogeneous disease have been revealed. Well-powered and comprehensive HLA analyses of subgroups in MG are warranted, especially in late onset MG. This case-control association study is of a large population-based Norwegian cohort of 369 MG patients and 651 healthy controls. We performed comprehensive genotyping of four classical HLA loci (HLA-A, -B, -C and -DRB1) and showed that the DRB1*15:01 allele conferred the strongest risk in late onset MG (LOMG; onset ≥ 60 years) (OR 2.38, p(c)7.4 × 10(-5)). DRB1*13:01 was found to be a protective allele for both early onset MG (EOMG) and LOMG (OR 0.31, p(c) 4.71 × 10(-4)), a finding not previously described. No significant association was found to the DRB1*07:01 allele (p(nc) = 0.18) in a subset of nonthymomatous anti-titin antibody positive LOMG as reported by others. HLA-B*08 was mapped to give the strongest contribution to EOMG, supporting previous studies. The results from this study provide important new information concerning the susceptibility of HLA alleles in Caucasian MG, with highlights on DRB1*15:01 as being a major risk allele in LOMG.
    PLoS ONE 05/2012; 7(5):e36603. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0036603 · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Myasthenic syndromes are distinct disorders at the neuromuscular junction, most often with well characterized autoimmune or genetic pathology. New aspects of the dysfunctions give insight into the normal neuromuscular function in addition to giving therapeutic clues and tailoring the therapy to the pathophysiology in individual patients. Patients with myasthenia gravis and congenital myasthenic syndromes should be further classified into distinct subgroups. Myasthenia gravis with low-affinity acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies and myasthenia gravis with antibodies to the postsynaptic low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 represent new groups, whereas a myasthenia gravis subgroup without any detectable antibodies still persists. Myasthenia gravis with antibodies against muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) is, due to new reports, now as established as AChR-myasthenia gravis regarding disease mechanisms and recommended therapy. Myasthenic syndromes and myasthenia gravis are well characterized disorders. The prognosis is generally good, apart from paraneoplastic Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. However, patients need long-term symptomatic and immunoactive treatment, this treatment to be balanced against present and potential side effects. New and more selective treatment is needed, especially for severe generalized disease. Well controlled long-term studies of sufficient power are much wanted, but new therapy has often to be tried in patients before high-class evidence of effect on myasthenia gravis has been published.
    Current opinion in neurology 08/2012; 25(5):523-9. DOI:10.1097/WCO.0b013e3283572588 · 5.73 Impact Factor
Show more