Article

Hyponatremia in Hospitalized Cancer Patients and Its Impact on Clinical Outcomes

Division of Internal Medicine, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, 77030, USA.
American Journal of Kidney Diseases (Impact Factor: 5.76). 02/2012; 59(2):222-8. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.08.029
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte abnormality in clinical practice, yet little is known about its frequency in patients with cancer or its impact on their clinical outcomes.
Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.
Patients with cancer admitted to the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in 2006 for 3 months.
Serum sodium levels categorized as eunatremia (serum sodium, 135-147 mEq/L) and mild (134-130 mEq/L), moderate (129-120 mEq/L), and severe (<120 mEq/L) hyponatremia.
(1) Length of hospital stay and (2) 90-day mortality.
In 4,702 admissions in 3,357 patients with cancer, hyponatremia (serum sodium <135 mEq/L) was noted in 47% of admissions. It was mild in 36%, moderate in 10%, and severe in 1%. Hyponatremia was acquired during the hospital stay in 24%. Using the first admission data, mean length of stay was 5.6 ± 5.0 days for patients with eunatremia and 9.9 ± 9.2, 13.0 ± 14.1, and 11.5 ± 12.6 days for those with mild, moderate, and severe hyponatremia, respectively. The respective HRs in the multivariate Cox model for longer hospital stay, using patients with eunatremia as reference, were 1.92 (95% CI, 1.75-2.13; P < 0.01), 2.94 (95% CI, 2.56-3.45; P < 0.01), and 2.32 (95% CI, 1.32-4.00; P = 0.01). 283 (8.4%) deaths occurred during 90 days, and in the multivariate model, the respective HRs for 90-day mortality for mild, moderate, and severe hyponatremia were 2.04 (95% CI, 1.42-2.91; P < 0.01); 4.74 (95% CI, 3.21-7.01; P < 0.01), and 3.46 (95% CI, 1.05-11.44; P = 0.04). These findings were consistent when analyses were repeated with sodium levels in tertiles.
Observational study, retrospective, inability to adjust for all comorbid conditions.
Hyponatremia in patients with cancer is associated with longer hospital stay and higher mortality. Whether long-term correction of hyponatremia would improve these outcomes remains to be determined.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Amit Lahoti, Jun 12, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
164 Views
  • American Journal of Kidney Diseases 02/2012; 59(2):168-9. DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.12.004 · 5.76 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hyponatremia, a common electrolyte abnormality in oncology practice, may be a negative prognostic factor in cancer patients based on a systematic analysis of published studies. The largest body of evidence comes from small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), for which hyponatremia was identified as an independent risk factor for poor outcome in six of 13 studies. Hyponatremia in the cancer patient is usually caused by the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH), which develops more frequently with SCLC than with other malignancies. SIADH may be driven by ectopic production of arginine vasopressin (AVP) by tumors or by effects of anticancer and palliative medications on AVP production or action. Other factors may cause hypovolemic hyponatremia, including diarrhea and vomiting caused by cancer therapy. Hyponatremia may be detected on routine laboratory testing before or during cancer treatment or may be suggested by the presence of mostly neurological symptoms. Treatment depends on several factors, including symptom severity, onset timing, and extracellular volume status. Appropriate diagnosis is important because treatment differs by etiology, and choosing the wrong approach can worsen the electrolyte abnormality. When hyponatremia is caused by SIADH, hypertonic saline is indicated for acute, symptomatic cases, whereas fluid restriction is recommended to achieve a slower rate of correction for chronic asymptomatic hyponatremia. Pharmacological therapy may be necessary when fluid restriction is insufficient. The orally active, selective AVP receptor 2 (V(2))-receptor antagonist tolvaptan provides a mechanism-based option for correcting hyponatremia caused by SIADH or other conditions with inappropriate AVP elevations. By blocking AVP effects in the renal collecting duct, tolvaptan promotes aquaresis, leading to a controlled increase in serum sodium levels.
    The Oncologist 05/2012; 17(6):756-65. DOI:10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0400 · 4.54 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Tolvaptan is a member of a new class of drugs, called the vaptans, that antagonize receptors of the neurohormone arginine vasopressin. From a clinical perspective, tolvaptan has been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of hyponatremia, whether it is idiopathic or disease related, and it may have a more favorable benefit/risk profile than other treatment modalities. From an economic perspective, tolvaptan is an expensive drug for treating hyponatremia, but recent economic cost-offset models provide evidence that tolvaptan can be cost effective. The cost-effectiveness of tolvaptan is driven by reduced healthcare resource usage and hospitalization costs. More comparative research of tolvaptan versus other pharmacotherapies and analyses of patients treated with tolvaptan in the real world are needed to better determine the benefits of tolvaptan usage to patient outcome, and more accurately assess its value in the treatment of hyponatremia, an independent predictor of morbidity, mortality and cost.
    Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research 08/2012; 12(4):399-410. DOI:10.1586/erp.12.30 · 1.87 Impact Factor
Show more