A nonlinear stability analysis of vegetative turing pattern formation for an interaction-diffusion plant-surface water model system in an arid flat environment.

Department of Mathematics, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-3113, USA.
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology (Impact Factor: 1.29). 04/2012; 74(4):803-33. DOI: 10.1007/s11538-011-9688-7
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The development of spontaneous stationary vegetative patterns in an arid flat environment is investigated by means of a weakly nonlinear diffusive instability analysis applied to the appropriate model system for this phenomenon. In particular, that process can be modeled by a partial differential interaction-diffusion equation system for the plant biomass density and the surface water content defined on an unbounded flat spatial domain. The main results of this analysis can be represented by closed-form plots in the rate of precipitation versus the specific rate of plant density loss parameter space. From these plots, regions corresponding to bare ground and vegetative patterns consisting of parallel stripes, labyrinth-like mazes, hexagonal arrays of gaps, irregular mosaics, and homogeneous distributions of vegetation, respectively, may be identified in this parameter space. Then those theoretical predictions are compared with both relevant observational evidence involving tiger and pearled bush patterns and existing numerical simulations of similar model systems as well as placed in the context of the results from some recent nonlinear vegetative pattern formation studies.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Spatially periodic patterns can be observed in a variety of ecosystems. Model studies revealed that patterned ecosystems may respond in a nonlinear way to environmental change, meaning that gradual changes result in rapid degradation. We analyze this response through stability analysis of patterned states of an arid ecosystem model. This analysis goes one step further than the frequently applied Turing analysis, which only considers stability of uniform states. We found that patterned arid ecosystems systematically respond in two ways to changes in rainfall: (1) by changing vegetation patch biomass or (2) by adapting pattern wavelength. Minor adaptations of pattern wavelength are constrained to conditions of slow change within a high rainfall regime, and high levels of stochastic variation in biomass (noise). Major changes in pattern wavelength occur under conditions of either low rainfall, rapid change or low levels of noise. Such conditions facilitate strong interactions between vegetation patches, which can trigger a sudden loss of half the patches or a transition to a degraded bare state. These results highlight that ecosystem responses may critically depend on rates, rather than magnitudes, of environmental change. Our study shows how models can increase our understanding of these dynamics, provided that analyses go beyond the conventional Turing analysis.
    Ecological Complexity 12/2014; 20:81–96. DOI:10.1016/j.ecocom.2014.09.002 · 2.00 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper we introduce a conceptual model for vegetation patterns that generalizes the Klausmeier model for semi-arid ecosystems on a sloped terrain (Klausmeier in Science 284:1826-1828, 1999). Our model not only incorporates downhill flow, but also linear or nonlinear diffusion for the water component. To relate the model to observations and simulations in ecology, we first consider the onset of pattern formation through a Turing or a Turing-Hopf bifurcation. We perform a Ginzburg-Landau analysis to study the weakly nonlinear evolution of small amplitude patterns and we show that the Turing/Turing-Hopf bifurcation is supercritical under realistic circumstances. In the second part we numerically construct Busse balloons to further follow the family of stable spatially periodic (vegetation) patterns. We find that destabilization (and thus desertification) can be caused by three different mechanisms: fold, Hopf and sideband instability, and show that the Hopf instability can no longer occur when the gradient of the domain is above a certain threshold. We encounter a number of intriguing phenomena, such as a `Hopf dance' and a fine structure of sideband instabilities. Finally, we conclude that there exists no decisive qualitative difference between the Busse balloons for the model with standard diffusion and the Busse balloons for the model with nonlinear diffusion.
    Journal of Nonlinear Science 02/2013; 23(1):39-95. DOI:10.1007/s00332-012-9139-0 · 2.09 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Landscape-scale patterns of vegetation occur worldwide at interfaces between semiarid and arid climates. They are important as potential indicators of climate change and imminent regime shifts and are widely thought to arise from positive feedback between vegetation and infiltration of rainwater. On gentle slopes the typical pattern form is bands (stripes), oriented parallel to the contours, and their wavelength is probably the most accessible statistic for vegetation patterns. Recent field studies have found an inverse correlation between pattern wavelength and slope, in apparent contradiction with the predictions of mathematical models. Here I show that this "contradiction" is based on a flawed approach to calculating the wavelength in models. When pattern generation is considered in detail, the theory is fully consistent with empirical results. For realistic parameters, degradation of uniform vegetation generates patterns whose wavelength increases with slope, whereas colonization of bare ground gives the opposite trend. Therefore, the empirical finding of an inverse relationship can be used, in conjunction with climate records, to infer the historical origin of the patterns. Specifically, for the African Sahel my results suggest that banded vegetation originated by the colonization of bare ground during circa 1760-1790 or since circa 1850.
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 03/2015; 112(14). DOI:10.1073/pnas.1420171112 · 9.81 Impact Factor



Bonni Dichone