Article

Associations of discrimination and violence with smoking among emerging adults: differences by gender and sexual orientation.

Translational Tobacco Reduction Research Program, Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center and Prevention Research Center, Department of Community Medicine, West Virginia University, PO Box 9190, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
Nicotine & Tobacco Research (impact factor: 2.58). 12/2011; 13(12):1284-95. DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntr183 pp.1284-95
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (i.e., sexual minority) populations have higher smoking prevalence than their heterosexual peers, but there is a lack of empirical study into why such disparities exist. This secondary analysis of data sought to examine associations of discrimination and violence victimization with cigarette smoking within sexual orientation groups.
Data from the Fall 2008 and Spring 2009 National College Health Assessments were truncated to respondents of 18-24 years of age (n = 92,470). Since heterosexuals comprised over 90% of respondents, a random 5% subsample of heterosexuals was drawn, creating a total analytic sample of 11,046. Smoking status (i.e., never-, ever-, and current smoker) was regressed on general (e.g., not sexual orientation-specific) measures of past-year victimization and discrimination. To examine within-group differences, two sets of multivariate ordered logistic regression analyses were conducted: one set of models stratified by sexual orientation and another set stratified by gender-by-sexual-orientation groups.
Sexual minorities indicated more experiences of violence victimization and discrimination when compared with their heterosexual counterparts and had nearly twice the current smoking prevalence of heterosexuals. After adjusting for age and race, lesbians/gays who were in physical fights or were physically assaulted had higher proportional odds of being current smokers when compared with their lesbian/gay counterparts who did not experience those stressors.
When possible, lesbian/gay and bisexual groups should be analyzed separately, as analyses revealed that bisexuals had a higher risk profile than lesbians/gays. Further research is needed with more nuanced measures of smoking (e.g., intensity), as well as examining if victimization may interact with smoking cessation.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
54 Views

Keywords

bisexual
 
bisexual groups
 
cigarette smoking
 
current smoker
 
current smoking prevalence
 
gender-by-sexual-orientation groups
 
heterosexual counterparts
 
heterosexual peers
 
higher risk profile
 
logistic regression analyses
 
models stratified
 
random 5% subsample
 
secondary analysis
 
set stratified
 
Sexual minorities
 
sexual orientation
 
sexual orientation groups
 
sexual orientation-specific
 
smoking cessation
 
within-group differences
 

John R Blosnich