Epidemiological designs for vaccine safety assessment: Methods and pitfalls
Statistics Modelling and Economics Department, Health Protection Services, Health Protection Agency, 61 Colindale Avenue, London, NW9 5EQ, UK.Biologicals (Impact Factor: 1.21). 10/2011; 40(5):389-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2011.08.010
Three commonly used designs for vaccine safety assessment post licensure are cohort, case-control and self-controlled case series. These methods are often used with routine health databases and immunisation registries. This paper considers the issues that may arise when designing an epidemiological study, such as understanding the vaccine safety question, case definition and finding, limitations of data sources, uncontrolled confounding, and pitfalls that apply to the individual designs. The example of MMR and autism, where all three designs have been used, is presented to help consider these issues.
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To evaluate the risk of narcolepsy in children and adolescents in England targeted for vaccination with ASO3 adjuvanted pandemic A/H1N1 2009 vaccine (Pandemrix) from October 2009. Retrospective analysis. Clinical information and results of sleep tests were extracted from hospital notes between August 2011 and February 2012 and reviewed by an expert panel to confirm the diagnosis. Vaccination and clinical histories were obtained from general practitioners. Sleep centres and paediatric neurology centres in England. Children and young people aged 4-18 with onset of narcolepsy from January 2008. The odds of vaccination in those with narcolepsy compared with the age matched English population after adjustment for clinical conditions that were indications for vaccination. The incidence of narcolepsy within six months of vaccination compared with the incidence outside this period measured with the self controlled cases series method. Case notes for 245 children and young people were reviewed; 75 had narcolepsy (56 with cataplexy) and onset after 1 January 2008. Eleven had been vaccinated before onset; seven within six months. In those with a diagnosis by July 2011 the odds ratio was 14.4 (95% confidence interval 4.3 to 48.5) for vaccination at any time before onset and 16.2 (3.1 to 84.5) for vaccination within six months before onset. The relative incidence from the self controlled cases series analysis in those with a diagnosis by July 2011 with onset from October 2008 to December 2010 was 9.9 (2.1 to 47.9). The attributable risk was estimated as between 1 in 57 500 and 1 in 52 000 doses. The increased risk of narcolepsy after vaccination with ASO3 adjuvanted pandemic A/H1N1 2009 vaccine indicates a causal association, consistent with findings from Finland. Because of variable delay in diagnosis, however, the risk might be overestimated by more rapid referral of vaccinated children.BMJ (online) 02/2013; 346(feb26 2):f794. DOI:10.1136/bmj.f794 · 17.45 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Background Carotid angioplasty and stent (CAS) placement has emerged as an attractive revascularization strategy for patients with internal carotid artery stenosis. However, the effectiveness and safety of CAS were not fully evaluated, mainly because of methodological difficulties in finding an appropriate comparison group. Methods Patients who underwent CAS were identified from Taiwan's National Health Insurance claims database between 2005 and 2008. The incidence rate of ischemic stroke after CAS was compared with that of the year prior to the procedure using a self-controlled case series analysis and a conditional Poisson regression model. Logistic regression was conducted to identify factors associated with poor outcome. Results A total of 1258 patients who had undergone CAS were included, and 73 cases (5.8%) of death or ischemic stroke occurred during the index hospitalization. Within 1 year after CAS, 74 patients died and 80 experienced an ischemic stroke. Of the 1184 patients who were followed for 360 days, the rate ratio for ischemic stroke decreased to 0.21 (95% CI: 0.08–0.51) between 31 and 180 days, and 0.10 (95% CI: 0.03–0.32) between 181 and 360 days. Statin therapy was associated with a reduced risk of death or ischemic stroke in the 1st month (odds ratio of 0.53; 95% CI: 0.32–0.90). Conversely, the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, possibly histamine-2 receptor blockers, and CAS performed by low-volume operators were associated with a twofold increased risk. Conclusion CAS reduced the long-term risk for ischemic stroke. Self-controlled case series analysis might be an appropriate design for evaluating device safety and effectiveness.Journal of the Formosan Medical Association 01/2014; 114(3). DOI:10.1016/j.jfma.2014.05.001 · 1.97 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.